RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    저자담론 밖의 다른 사유가능성 = Another mode of Mentality beyond a Discourse of Authority

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100272644

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Purpose of this paper is to clarify the characteristics and the limit of a discourse of authority and to make a further study of a principle and a peculiarity of orality beyond that discourse. The concept of author in question is restricted to the modern literature and the historicity of modern society. Nevertheless, it was produced by a unconscious desires of human beings to find the universal principle over history and society. In it does the will of modern people work, to eliminate the diversity and difference in man``s thoughts Historically considered, although the meaning of author was determined by politics, economies and culture of modern times, could the term of author be established through the influence of the printing technique, which can not be understood as a means of expressing man``s thoughts, but as an epoch-making way of externalizing the human mind. Futhermore the special qualities of the printing media, without which the discourse of authority in modern times is not possible, result from a principle of the alphabet in ancient Greece. It has done by Plato, to bring out a problem of the new writing method with letter, that had supported grounds and fundamentals of the authority. In result, his thoughts has served a model for the myth of the author or the episteme of the subject. However, there remained some traces in Plato``s philosophy, in which man is able to search for another mode of mentality beyond a discourse of authority. Hereby can man investigate the characteristics of the orality beyond the literacy. This studies are aiming not only at criticizing the author-centralizing culture, but also at promoting increased mutual understanding between orality and literacy. By doing so, we are hoping for researching a new possibility of society
    번역하기

    The Purpose of this paper is to clarify the characteristics and the limit of a discourse of authority and to make a further study of a principle and a peculiarity of orality beyond that discourse. The concept of author in question is restricted to the...

    The Purpose of this paper is to clarify the characteristics and the limit of a discourse of authority and to make a further study of a principle and a peculiarity of orality beyond that discourse. The concept of author in question is restricted to the modern literature and the historicity of modern society. Nevertheless, it was produced by a unconscious desires of human beings to find the universal principle over history and society. In it does the will of modern people work, to eliminate the diversity and difference in man``s thoughts Historically considered, although the meaning of author was determined by politics, economies and culture of modern times, could the term of author be established through the influence of the printing technique, which can not be understood as a means of expressing man``s thoughts, but as an epoch-making way of externalizing the human mind. Futhermore the special qualities of the printing media, without which the discourse of authority in modern times is not possible, result from a principle of the alphabet in ancient Greece. It has done by Plato, to bring out a problem of the new writing method with letter, that had supported grounds and fundamentals of the authority. In result, his thoughts has served a model for the myth of the author or the episteme of the subject. However, there remained some traces in Plato``s philosophy, in which man is able to search for another mode of mentality beyond a discourse of authority. Hereby can man investigate the characteristics of the orality beyond the literacy. This studies are aiming not only at criticizing the author-centralizing culture, but also at promoting increased mutual understanding between orality and literacy. By doing so, we are hoping for researching a new possibility of society

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김성재, "플루서, 미디어 현상학" 커뮤니케이션북스, 2013

    2 이강서, "플라톤의 언어관 -『파이드로스』와 『제 7 서한』의 문자비판을 중심으로-" 서양고전학연구 13 (1), 1999

    3 해블록, "플라톤 서설" 글항아리, 2011

    4 진태원, "푸코의 주체화 개념-주체화(subjectivation) II"

    5 이강서, "튀빙엔 학파: 연원과 쟁점" 범한철학 64 (1) : 85 ~ 109, 2012

    6 R. Barthes, "텍스트의 즐거움" 동문선, 2002

    7 M. Foucault, "지식의 고고학" 민음사, 1997

    8 변광배, "저자의 죽음과 귀환: R. 바르트를 중심으로" 세계문학비교연구 (45) : 209 ~ 231, 2013

    9 김창래, "저자란 무엇인가?" 철학 (112) : 71 ~ 114, 2012

    10 M. Foucault, "자기의 테크놀로지" 동문선, 1997

    1 김성재, "플루서, 미디어 현상학" 커뮤니케이션북스, 2013

    2 이강서, "플라톤의 언어관 -『파이드로스』와 『제 7 서한』의 문자비판을 중심으로-" 서양고전학연구 13 (1), 1999

    3 해블록, "플라톤 서설" 글항아리, 2011

    4 진태원, "푸코의 주체화 개념-주체화(subjectivation) II"

    5 이강서, "튀빙엔 학파: 연원과 쟁점" 범한철학 64 (1) : 85 ~ 109, 2012

    6 R. Barthes, "텍스트의 즐거움" 동문선, 2002

    7 M. Foucault, "지식의 고고학" 민음사, 1997

    8 변광배, "저자의 죽음과 귀환: R. 바르트를 중심으로" 세계문학비교연구 (45) : 209 ~ 231, 2013

    9 김창래, "저자란 무엇인가?" 철학 (112) : 71 ~ 114, 2012

    10 M. Foucault, "자기의 테크놀로지" 동문선, 1997

    11 남형두, "산업재산권" 2008

    12 김현, "미셸 푸코의 문학 비평" 문학과 지성사, 1996

    13 조대호, "기억과 플라톤의 전회"

    14 M. McLuhan, "구텐베르크 은하계" 커뮤니케이션북스, 2001

    15 진중권, "[진중권의 미학 에세이], 소크라테스의 독배"

    16 M. Foucault, "Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics" The Uni. of Chicago Press, 1983

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼