RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    정보유출배상책임보험에 대한 소고 = Study on Information Leakage Liability Insurance

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100252127

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Personal information leakage incident has occurred frequently. If thecompany dealing with customer information across all industries whereverpersonal information is being leaked such as game companies, mobilecommunication companies, portals, credit card companies, brokerage houses,insurance companies, etc. Personal information leakage even has an adverseeffect on the national economy. Therefore, on 29 Mar, 2011, the PersonalInformation Prospective Act was enacted to strengthen sanctions against theleakage and protect the personal information. Nevertheless, the personalinformation leakage is far unabated, and rather continue to grow. In addition,the number of leakages, contents and methods of information leakage arereaching increasingly serious and sensitive level. Paradoxically, the greater the amount of information to be protected inproportion to the development of information technology. Especially if thatinformation is trading in a particular industry is further emphasized the need forits protection. However, despite the importance of such protection, frequentinformation leakage causes heavy losses to the industry. Because of this socialdistrust of enterprises is increasing. The insurance is one of the most useful assistant systems that helpenterprises to act reliably. In particular, relatively to be free from responsibilityfor issues related to the damages to third parties in the course of leading acompany must use the insurance system. The introduction of informationleakage liability insurance is required. In order to compensate for the damagecaused by a third party information leakage, during the company``s operatingactivities. Insurance technical infrastructure must be established as aprecondition of smooth company activity. And we should consider how todefine the scope of the damage caused by information leakage indeed, definethe scope of the insurance accident and compensation paid by an insurer islimited to some extent whether. In addition, there are many problems to beresolved before the introduction of the liability insurance in accordance with theseriousness of the information leakage. Moreover, there has been a discussionfor operating the liability insurance as compulsory insurance but it should bejudged from a variety of perspectives to be reasonable.
    번역하기

    Personal information leakage incident has occurred frequently. If thecompany dealing with customer information across all industries whereverpersonal information is being leaked such as game companies, mobilecommunication companies, portals, credit ca...

    Personal information leakage incident has occurred frequently. If thecompany dealing with customer information across all industries whereverpersonal information is being leaked such as game companies, mobilecommunication companies, portals, credit card companies, brokerage houses,insurance companies, etc. Personal information leakage even has an adverseeffect on the national economy. Therefore, on 29 Mar, 2011, the PersonalInformation Prospective Act was enacted to strengthen sanctions against theleakage and protect the personal information. Nevertheless, the personalinformation leakage is far unabated, and rather continue to grow. In addition,the number of leakages, contents and methods of information leakage arereaching increasingly serious and sensitive level. Paradoxically, the greater the amount of information to be protected inproportion to the development of information technology. Especially if thatinformation is trading in a particular industry is further emphasized the need forits protection. However, despite the importance of such protection, frequentinformation leakage causes heavy losses to the industry. Because of this socialdistrust of enterprises is increasing. The insurance is one of the most useful assistant systems that helpenterprises to act reliably. In particular, relatively to be free from responsibilityfor issues related to the damages to third parties in the course of leading acompany must use the insurance system. The introduction of informationleakage liability insurance is required. In order to compensate for the damagecaused by a third party information leakage, during the company``s operatingactivities. Insurance technical infrastructure must be established as aprecondition of smooth company activity. And we should consider how todefine the scope of the damage caused by information leakage indeed, definethe scope of the insurance accident and compensation paid by an insurer islimited to some extent whether. In addition, there are many problems to beresolved before the introduction of the liability insurance in accordance with theseriousness of the information leakage. Moreover, there has been a discussionfor operating the liability insurance as compulsory insurance but it should bejudged from a variety of perspectives to be reasonable.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최창희, "해외 사이버배상책임보험시장 성장의 시사점" 보험연구원 2014

    2 고평석, "책임보험계약법론" 삼지원 1990

    3 김은경, "영업배상책임보험의 법적 접근" 법학연구원 (38) : 385-406, 2012

    4 정찬형, "상법(하)" 박영사 2014

    5 김소연, "국내 사이버 위험과 사이버 보험에 관한 연구" 2014

    6 보험개발원, "개인정보유출 배상책임보험의 활성화 방안" CEO 2012

    7 보험연구원 산업연구실, "개인정보 유출리스크 증대에 따른 안정망 구축 필요성" 2010

    8 "http://www.techinsurance.com/cyber-liability-insurance/"

    9 "http://www.symantec.com/content/en/us/enterprise/other_resources/b-istr_main_report_v19_21291018.en-us.pdf"

    10 "http://www.pipc.go.kr/"

    1 최창희, "해외 사이버배상책임보험시장 성장의 시사점" 보험연구원 2014

    2 고평석, "책임보험계약법론" 삼지원 1990

    3 김은경, "영업배상책임보험의 법적 접근" 법학연구원 (38) : 385-406, 2012

    4 정찬형, "상법(하)" 박영사 2014

    5 김소연, "국내 사이버 위험과 사이버 보험에 관한 연구" 2014

    6 보험개발원, "개인정보유출 배상책임보험의 활성화 방안" CEO 2012

    7 보험연구원 산업연구실, "개인정보 유출리스크 증대에 따른 안정망 구축 필요성" 2010

    8 "http://www.techinsurance.com/cyber-liability-insurance/"

    9 "http://www.symantec.com/content/en/us/enterprise/other_resources/b-istr_main_report_v19_21291018.en-us.pdf"

    10 "http://www.pipc.go.kr/"

    11 "http://www.mcafee.com/sg/resources/reports/rp-economic-impact-cybercrime.pdf"

    12 Weyers, "Versicherungsvertragsrecht" Luchterhand 1995

    13 Manfred Wandt, "Versicherungsrecht" Carl Heymanns Verlag 2010

    14 Bruck, "VVG, De Gruyter" De Gruyter 2013

    15 Langheid, "VVG" C.H. Beck 2011

    16 Looschelders, "VVG" Heymanns 2009

    17 Prölss, "VVG" C.H. Beck 2004

    18 McAfee, "The Economic Impact of Cybercrime and Cyber Espionage"

    19 Schwintoski, "Praxiskommentar zum VVG" Jurabuch 2010

    20 "Industriesponage 2014, Corporate & Trust"

    21 Michael F. Dengler, "Die Haftpflichtversicherung im privaten und gewerblichen Bereich" C.H. Beck 2003

    22 Deutsch, "Das neue Versicherungsvertragsrecht" VVW 2008

    23 Richard S. Betterley, "Cyber/Privacy insurance market survey-2012, The Betterley Report" 2012

    24 "Corporate Trust 2014"

    25 H. Honsell, "Berliner Kommentar-VVG" Springer 1999

    26 Allianz, "Allianz Risk Barometer on Business Risk 2014, Top 10 global business risks for 2014"

    27 Symantec, "2014 Internet Security Threat Report, Vol. 19"

    28 Symantec, "2013 Internet Security Threat Report, Vol. 18"

    29 개인정보보호위원회, "2012 개인정보보호연차보고서" 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.77 0.77 0.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.7 0.65 0.772 0.44
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼