RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    팝아트를 중심으로 본 복제의 미학 = The Aesthetic of Replication in Pop Art

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100162646

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    If the most prominent features of a work of art happen to be elements of machine-based mass production, i.e., standardization, repetition and replication, this is likely because, in whatever respect,the work reflects an aestheticrelated to the culture of mechanization. This paper examines the works of Futurists, Purists, Dadaists and of Fernand Leger, in order to explore the meaning of the replication in Pop within the larger context of art history. In the early twentieth century, artists thought of replicationas either a weapon against the arrogance and parochilaism of previous generations, or a strategy to transcend the traditional notion of art as bound by a hierarchy and broaden the definition of man-made beauty. As part of a trend that had continued since the mid-nineteenth century, replication implicated the social significance of a new aesthetic not removed from daily life. This aesthetic of replication was succeeded bythe following generation of art movements including Neo-Dada, Pop and Nouveau Realisme, and especially by artists in the United States. Raised in a culture of consumerism repsresented by an excess of mass-produced goods, photographs, advertisements and ready-to-eat foods, American artists were emboldened by the confidence that theirs could be the generation that establishes Pop as the most American form of art, and thus actively introduced increasingly commercial and replicated materials in their works. As did their previous generation in the 1910s, American Pop artists strived to express in detail the reality of a consumerist society where everything is reproduced and consumed, using replication as a means to challenge formalist modernism, which had pursued “art for art’s sake.” In this respect, they succeeded the perspective of Realists, who believed art should bear testimony to the spirit of the times. And while their blatent ordinariness make the works appear extremely apathetic and mechanical, ironically, it also allows the art to speak to the viewer in a more serious, piercing voice. Through the act of replication, without which the structure of consumerist societies cannot be explained, Pop art provided an opportunity to once again reflect upon the world we live in, raising the oldest, most fundamental question about art and aesthetics, “What does it mean to create art?”
    번역하기

    If the most prominent features of a work of art happen to be elements of machine-based mass production, i.e., standardization, repetition and replication, this is likely because, in whatever respect,the work reflects an aestheticrelated to the culture...

    If the most prominent features of a work of art happen to be elements of machine-based mass production, i.e., standardization, repetition and replication, this is likely because, in whatever respect,the work reflects an aestheticrelated to the culture of mechanization. This paper examines the works of Futurists, Purists, Dadaists and of Fernand Leger, in order to explore the meaning of the replication in Pop within the larger context of art history. In the early twentieth century, artists thought of replicationas either a weapon against the arrogance and parochilaism of previous generations, or a strategy to transcend the traditional notion of art as bound by a hierarchy and broaden the definition of man-made beauty. As part of a trend that had continued since the mid-nineteenth century, replication implicated the social significance of a new aesthetic not removed from daily life. This aesthetic of replication was succeeded bythe following generation of art movements including Neo-Dada, Pop and Nouveau Realisme, and especially by artists in the United States. Raised in a culture of consumerism repsresented by an excess of mass-produced goods, photographs, advertisements and ready-to-eat foods, American artists were emboldened by the confidence that theirs could be the generation that establishes Pop as the most American form of art, and thus actively introduced increasingly commercial and replicated materials in their works. As did their previous generation in the 1910s, American Pop artists strived to express in detail the reality of a consumerist society where everything is reproduced and consumed, using replication as a means to challenge formalist modernism, which had pursued “art for art’s sake.” In this respect, they succeeded the perspective of Realists, who believed art should bear testimony to the spirit of the times. And while their blatent ordinariness make the works appear extremely apathetic and mechanical, ironically, it also allows the art to speak to the viewer in a more serious, piercing voice. Through the act of replication, without which the structure of consumerist societies cannot be explained, Pop art provided an opportunity to once again reflect upon the world we live in, raising the oldest, most fundamental question about art and aesthetics, “What does it mean to create art?”

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 복제미학의 미술사적 계보
    • Ⅲ. 팝아트에 나타난 복제성의 의미
    • Ⅳ. 맺는 말
    • 참고문헌
    • I. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 복제미학의 미술사적 계보
    • Ⅲ. 팝아트에 나타난 복제성의 의미
    • Ⅳ. 맺는 말
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Dypreau, Jean, "“L’objet dans l’art d’aujourd’hui,” in Métamorphose de l’objet: art et anti-art, 1910-1970(catalogue)"

    2 Green, Christopher, "“Léger and l’Esprit Nouveau, 1912~1928,” Léger and Purist Paris"

    3 Marinetti, F. T, "“Fondation et Manifeste du Futurisme,” Figaro, le 20 février 1909, in Giovanni Lista, Futurisme: Manifestes documents - proclamations"

    4 Schwitters, Kurt, "Écrits choisis" Éditions Gérard Lebovici 1990

    5 Tomkins, Calvin, "You Think This is a Supermarket? NO, hold your hats … It’s an ART GALLERY" 57 (57): 1964

    6 Art about Art (catalogue), "Whitney Museum of American Art, July 19-September 24"

    7 Hughes, Robert, "The Shock of the New" Alfred A. Knopf 1991

    8 Foster, Hal, "The Return of the Real" MIT Press 1996

    9 Rosenberg, Bernard, "The Popular Arts in America" Free Press 1957

    10 Coke, Van Deren, "The Painter and the Photograph" Albuquerque 1972

    1 Dypreau, Jean, "“L’objet dans l’art d’aujourd’hui,” in Métamorphose de l’objet: art et anti-art, 1910-1970(catalogue)"

    2 Green, Christopher, "“Léger and l’Esprit Nouveau, 1912~1928,” Léger and Purist Paris"

    3 Marinetti, F. T, "“Fondation et Manifeste du Futurisme,” Figaro, le 20 février 1909, in Giovanni Lista, Futurisme: Manifestes documents - proclamations"

    4 Schwitters, Kurt, "Écrits choisis" Éditions Gérard Lebovici 1990

    5 Tomkins, Calvin, "You Think This is a Supermarket? NO, hold your hats … It’s an ART GALLERY" 57 (57): 1964

    6 Art about Art (catalogue), "Whitney Museum of American Art, July 19-September 24"

    7 Hughes, Robert, "The Shock of the New" Alfred A. Knopf 1991

    8 Foster, Hal, "The Return of the Real" MIT Press 1996

    9 Rosenberg, Bernard, "The Popular Arts in America" Free Press 1957

    10 Coke, Van Deren, "The Painter and the Photograph" Albuquerque 1972

    11 De Duve, Thierry, "Résonances du readymade: Duchamp entre avant- garde et tradition" Éditions Jacqueline Chambon 1989

    12 Garaudy, Roger, "Pour un Réalism du XXe siècle: Dialogue Posthume avec Fernand Léger" Édition Grasset 1968

    13 Taylor, Paul, "Post-Pop" The MIT Press 1989

    14 Loran, Erle, "Pop Artists or Copy Cats"

    15 Lippard, Lucy R, "Pop Art" Thames and Hudson Ltd 1966

    16 Bihalji-Merin, "Oto, La Fin de l’art à l’ère de la sience" La Connaissance S. A. 1970

    17 "Métamorphose de l’objet: art et anti-art, 1910-1970 (catalogue)"

    18 "Modern Dreams: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Pop (catalogue)"

    19 Muller, Joseph-Emile, "L’Art et le non-art" Éditions Aimery Somogy 1970

    20 "Léger et l’Esprit Moderne (catalogue)"

    21 Baudrillard, Jean, "La Société de consommation: ses mythes, ses structures" Éditions Denoël 1970

    22 Lista, Giovanni, "Futurisme: manifestes documents-proclamations"

    23 Léger, Fernand, "Fonction de la Peinture" Éditions Gonthier 1965

    24 Le Bot, Marc, "Figures de l’art contemporain" Union Générale d’Éditions 1977

    25 "Fernand Léger: 1881~1955 (catalogue)"

    26 "Fernand Léger (catalogue)"

    27 Benjamin, Walter, "Essais 2: 1935-1940" Éditions Denoël 1971

    28 Sanouillet Michel, "Duchamp du signe: Écrits de Marcel Duchamp" Flammarion 1975

    29 Kuenzli, Rudolf E, "Dada/Surrealism, no.14 (New York Dada)" Association for the study of Dada and Surrealism 1985

    30 "Berlin-Paris; 1900-1933 (catalogue)"

    31 Whiting, Cécile, "A Taste for Pop: Pop Art, Gender and Consumer Culture" Cambridge University Press 1997

    32 Selz, Peter, "A Symposium on Pop Art" 37 (37): 1963

    33 Madoff, Steven Henry, "A Critical History" University of California Press 1997

    34 오진경, "1950-1960년대 뉴 리얼리즘 계열 미술동향 명칭에 관한 고찰" 한국미술사교육학회 17 : 2003

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-03-23 학회명변경 한글명 : (재)성강문화재단 한국미술연구소 -> 한국미술연구소
    영문명 : Sung Kang Foundation -> Center for Art Studies
    KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-06-29 학회명변경 한글명 : (재)성강문화재단 -> (재)성강문화재단 한국미술연구소
    영문명 : Sungn Gang Culture Foundation -> Sung Kang Foundation
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.84 0.84 0.81
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.72 0.61 0.836 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼