필담과 표류기의 현장에서 편집 및 출판까지의 거리 = The Distance from the site of Writing-Conversation and Drifting Record upto its Editing and Publishing

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the premodern era, Korean and Japanese intellectuals mostly left records when they met, namely in the forms of travel journals, written conversation and Chinese poem exchanges. Travel journals were a one-side account of what happened written by Joseon envoys upon their return to their homeland. Written conversations and Chinese poem exchanges were records exchanged between both parties, and mainly edited and published by the Japanese. Because publishing was time-consuming work which involved editing rough copies of written conversations and Chinese poem exchanges and engravings, Korean intellectuals returned to their country without verifying the printed versions. Therefore, there were possibilities that genuine records of written conversations and Chinese poem exchanges were modified to suit the intentions of the Japanese editors.
Records of written conversations between Ji-hang Lee and a Japanese government official when Lee was washed ashore on Hokkaido were partially altered in a testimony presented to Dongnae officials after Lee returned. This could be considered as negligence. Jwagan Pileo by Hakuseki Arai, published with modifications 80 years later, was used to undermine the role of the Korean delegation. The editor of Gyedan Angmyeong, which captured a respectful exchange of written conversations in 1763, published the document with an aggressive preface even before the Korean delegation returned to Joseon.
The difference between actual written conversations that took place on-site and their printed versions cannot be easily dismissed as fabrication or distortion. However, there is need to study the distance between the conversation by writing it and its editing and publishing. In addition, when studying historical documents related to Korea-Japan relations, it is necessary to examine their authenticity.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 池內敏, "李志恒 漂舟錄について" 28 : 1994

2 李志恒, "한국고전번역원 DB의 漂舟錄』"

3 구지현, "필담을 통한 한일 문사 교류의 전개와 양상.-赤間關을 중심으로-" 국학연구원 138 (138): 269-302, 2007

4 허경진, "표류민 이지항과 아이누인, 일본인 사이의 의사 소통" 열상고전연구회 32 (32): 53-82, 2010

5 허경진, "통신사와 접반사의 창수 양상 비교" (2) : 2006

6 허경진, "통신사기록 조사, 번역 및 목록화 연구" 문화재청 2014

7 허경진, "조선통신사 필담창화집의 일본 출판" 동악어문학회 54 (54): 295-322, 2010

8 이기용, "일본침략사상의 원형인 ‘神功皇后說話’" 한국일본사상사학회 (13) : 77-98, 2007

9 정응수, "아라이 하쿠세키(新井白石)의 조선통신사 의례 개정에 관하여" 한국일본문화학회 (24) : 305-320, 2005

10 하우봉, "새로 발견된 日本使行錄들" 112 : 1986

11 구지현, "계미통신사 사행문학 연구" 보고사 2011

12 李志恒, "漂流朝鮮人李先達呈辭"

13 이일재, "江關筆談에 대한 一考察" (19) : 2003

14 한기승, "易地聘禮와 征韓論" 한국일본어문학회 (4) : 2006

15 芳賀登, "日本人物情報大系" 皓星社 2000

16 "新井白石全集"

17 "坐間筆語 附江關筆談 全"

18 京都書肆変遷史編纂委員会, "京都書肆変遷史 ―出版文化の源流" 京都府書, 店商業組合 1976

19 서현경, "『열하일기』 정본의 탐색과 서술 분석" 연세대학교 대학원 2008

20 허경진, "『漂海录』体现的朝中两国人的相互认识" 중국연구소 48 : 219-230, 2010

21 허경진, "18세기 후반 일본에서의 『坐間筆語』 간행의 의미" (9) : 2009

22 구지현, "17세기 필담창화의 성립과 일본인의 조선인식" 인문학연구원 44 (44): 5-28, 2009

23 구지현, "1711년 신묘통신사와 아라이 하쿠세키[新井白石]의 필담을 통한 상호 소통" 열상고전연구회 28 (28): 187-225, 2008