RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      1970년대 한미동맹 결속력에 관한 연구 -동맹안보문화의 영향을 중심으로- = A Study on the ROK-US Alliance Cohesiveness in the 1970s -Focused on the Alliance Security Culture-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100134005

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In this research, I define the alliance cohesiveness as the degree of cooperation between alliances in security policy. The ``alliance security culture`` is the core variable which affect on the change and development of the alliance cohesiveness. I argue that the alliance cohesiveness can be changed when the alliance security culture reevaluate the threat recognition and alliance interest. In this study, I estimate the cohesiveness of ROK-U.S. Alliance based on the indices such as military power and armament of the United States Force Korea (USFK), pledges of leaders, the degree of alliance institutionalization and ROK-U.S. Joint Drills. In conclusion, the alliance cohesiveness has been changed by alliance security culture consists of alliance norm and alliance security identity. Several policy implications arc derived from above discussion. First of all, the United States should accept and admit the change of alliance security culture of South Korea in order to strengthen the ROK-U,S. Alliance. For this, it requires that the interpersonal exchange between policy makers involved in the alliance policy should be activated as well as legitimized to understand the mutual alliance culture. Secondly, ROK has to consent to the necessity of the stationing of U.S. military in Korea without any sentimental access for ``independent or equality`` until ROK develop enough military power. The development of public awareness and the growth of economic capability after the Cold War have increased requirement of autonomy in military policy. However, it is desirable that alliance conflict should be minimized by the formulation of alliance security culture for ``independent cooperation`` type. At last, it demands every effort to establish the regional security council of ROK-U.S. Alliance, The Republic of Korea can easily resolve such hot issues as the defense cost-sharing, relocation and deployment of the USFK, SOFA and the restriction of wartime operation control.
      번역하기

      In this research, I define the alliance cohesiveness as the degree of cooperation between alliances in security policy. The ``alliance security culture`` is the core variable which affect on the change and development of the alliance cohesiveness. I a...

      In this research, I define the alliance cohesiveness as the degree of cooperation between alliances in security policy. The ``alliance security culture`` is the core variable which affect on the change and development of the alliance cohesiveness. I argue that the alliance cohesiveness can be changed when the alliance security culture reevaluate the threat recognition and alliance interest. In this study, I estimate the cohesiveness of ROK-U.S. Alliance based on the indices such as military power and armament of the United States Force Korea (USFK), pledges of leaders, the degree of alliance institutionalization and ROK-U.S. Joint Drills. In conclusion, the alliance cohesiveness has been changed by alliance security culture consists of alliance norm and alliance security identity. Several policy implications arc derived from above discussion. First of all, the United States should accept and admit the change of alliance security culture of South Korea in order to strengthen the ROK-U,S. Alliance. For this, it requires that the interpersonal exchange between policy makers involved in the alliance policy should be activated as well as legitimized to understand the mutual alliance culture. Secondly, ROK has to consent to the necessity of the stationing of U.S. military in Korea without any sentimental access for ``independent or equality`` until ROK develop enough military power. The development of public awareness and the growth of economic capability after the Cold War have increased requirement of autonomy in military policy. However, it is desirable that alliance conflict should be minimized by the formulation of alliance security culture for ``independent cooperation`` type. At last, it demands every effort to establish the regional security council of ROK-U.S. Alliance, The Republic of Korea can easily resolve such hot issues as the defense cost-sharing, relocation and deployment of the USFK, SOFA and the restriction of wartime operation control.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼