RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    노인요양시설의 입소과정에서 제공해야 하는 정보는 무엇인가?

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99655577

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study aims to identify what information is needed to provide for older adults or their guardians to make the admission decision process to nursing homes. In particular, a practical guide to information provision for nursing home admission was designed. Using a participatory action research, the researchers conducted in-depth interviews with 20 nursing home residents, 10 guardians for residents, and 7 admission counselors who were recruited from 3 nursing homes in capital regions and 4 nursing homes in local regions. Data analysis was performed by the constant comparative method. The findings from resident group revealed the several categories such as strengths and weaknesses of nursing home placement, facility location, room-mates’ characteristics, meal plan, adapting assistant, nursing home life, social engagement services, and improving quality in nursing homes. In-depth interviews with family member group suggested adapting assistant for newly placed resident, clothing, food, end housing life, informed consent, payments, perception about nursing homes, and organizational efforts to improve quality of care. In addition, facility admission counselor group identified introduction to admission, rights and responsibilities as a resident and legal representative, occurrences of accidents, rules and regulation, advance directives, and transfer and discharges. Based on the main results of the study, a practical guide to information provision for nursing home admission was developed and the guide obtained positive evaluation from service providers as well as users by applying it on admission counselling process. Finally, the strengths and limitations of the guide wee discussed for improvement of it.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study aims to identify what information is needed to provide for older adults or their guardians to make the admission decision process to nursing homes. In particular, a practical guide to information provision for nursing home ad...

    The purpose of this study aims to identify what information is needed to provide for older adults or their guardians to make the admission decision process to nursing homes. In particular, a practical guide to information provision for nursing home admission was designed. Using a participatory action research, the researchers conducted in-depth interviews with 20 nursing home residents, 10 guardians for residents, and 7 admission counselors who were recruited from 3 nursing homes in capital regions and 4 nursing homes in local regions. Data analysis was performed by the constant comparative method. The findings from resident group revealed the several categories such as strengths and weaknesses of nursing home placement, facility location, room-mates’ characteristics, meal plan, adapting assistant, nursing home life, social engagement services, and improving quality in nursing homes. In-depth interviews with family member group suggested adapting assistant for newly placed resident, clothing, food, end housing life, informed consent, payments, perception about nursing homes, and organizational efforts to improve quality of care. In addition, facility admission counselor group identified introduction to admission, rights and responsibilities as a resident and legal representative, occurrences of accidents, rules and regulation, advance directives, and transfer and discharges. Based on the main results of the study, a practical guide to information provision for nursing home admission was developed and the guide obtained positive evaluation from service providers as well as users by applying it on admission counselling process. Finally, the strengths and limitations of the guide wee discussed for improvement of it.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김둘순, "한국의 성 주류화 실행주체 구성과 역할" 2011

    2 이민홍, "클라이언트의 사회복지연구 참여를 위한 단축형동의능력선별척도의 개발에 관한 연구" 한국사회복지교육협의회 14 (14): 21-44, 2011

    3 유기웅, "질적연구방법의 이해" 박영사 2012

    4 이민홍, "잠재적 클라이언트의 프로그램 참여 동의능력평가지침서 개발 및 동의능력의 영향요인에 관한 탐색적 연구" 한국사회복지교육협의회 16 (16): 1-23, 2011

    5 이민홍, "잠재적 클라이언트의 사회복지프로그램 참여를 위한 동의능력선별척도의 타당도 검증에 관한 연구" 한국사회복지교육협의회 19 : 21-46, 2012

    6 신승연, "유료생활시설 노인의 입소의사결정과정이 입소 후 적응에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 18 : 111-127, 2002

    7 이가언, "시설노인의 적응과정에 대한 근거이론적 접근 : 거부감 다스리기" 한국간호과학회 32 (32): 624-632, 2002

    8 이가언, "시설노인의 입소경험" 13 (13): 668-678, 2002

    9 이민홍, "시설거주노인의 연구참여 동의능력 유무에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구" 한국노인복지학회 (46) : 173-192, 2009

    10 김정희, "사회사업에서의 Participatory Action Research(PAR)와 Action Research(AR) 모델 적용 필요성에 관한 연구" 2 (2): 113-133, 2005

    1 김둘순, "한국의 성 주류화 실행주체 구성과 역할" 2011

    2 이민홍, "클라이언트의 사회복지연구 참여를 위한 단축형동의능력선별척도의 개발에 관한 연구" 한국사회복지교육협의회 14 (14): 21-44, 2011

    3 유기웅, "질적연구방법의 이해" 박영사 2012

    4 이민홍, "잠재적 클라이언트의 프로그램 참여 동의능력평가지침서 개발 및 동의능력의 영향요인에 관한 탐색적 연구" 한국사회복지교육협의회 16 (16): 1-23, 2011

    5 이민홍, "잠재적 클라이언트의 사회복지프로그램 참여를 위한 동의능력선별척도의 타당도 검증에 관한 연구" 한국사회복지교육협의회 19 : 21-46, 2012

    6 신승연, "유료생활시설 노인의 입소의사결정과정이 입소 후 적응에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 18 : 111-127, 2002

    7 이가언, "시설노인의 적응과정에 대한 근거이론적 접근 : 거부감 다스리기" 한국간호과학회 32 (32): 624-632, 2002

    8 이가언, "시설노인의 입소경험" 13 (13): 668-678, 2002

    9 이민홍, "시설거주노인의 연구참여 동의능력 유무에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구" 한국노인복지학회 (46) : 173-192, 2009

    10 김정희, "사회사업에서의 Participatory Action Research(PAR)와 Action Research(AR) 모델 적용 필요성에 관한 연구" 2 (2): 113-133, 2005

    11 권중돈, "노인의 일상생활에서의 인터넷 활용 경험과 그 의미에 관한 질적 연구" 한국노년학회 32 (32): 835-850, 2012

    12 이혜경, "노인요양시설 입소노인의 시설적응에 영향을 미치는 요인" 한국간호과학회 39 (39): 177-185, 2009

    13 고진경, "노인요양시설 거주노인의 입소초기 경험" 한국노년학회 29 (29): 477-488, 2009

    14 Mukherjee, S, "The prevalence and correlates of capacity to consent to a geriatric psychiatry admission" 5 (5): 335-339, 2001

    15 Rudd, M. G, "The grief experienced by spousal caregivers of dementia patients: The role of place of care of patient and gender of caregiver" 48 (48): 217-240, 1999

    16 Stanley, B, "The functional competency of elderly at risk" 28 : 53-58, 1988

    17 Sturman, E. D, "The capacity to consent to treatment and research: A review of standardized assessment tools" 25 : 954-974, 2005

    18 Lee, M, "The Capacity to Consent to Research among Older Adults" 36 (36): 592-603, 2010

    19 Merriam, S. B, "Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation" Jossey-Bass 2009

    20 Bogdan, R, "Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods" Allyn & Bacon 2007

    21 Raymont, V, "Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: Cross-sectional study" 364 : 1421-1427, 2004

    22 Pruchno, R. A, "Predictors of institutionalization among Alzheimer’s disease victims with caregiving spouses" 45 : S259-S266, 1990

    23 Chenoweth, L, "Organizational and structural reform in aged care organizations: Empowerment towards a change process" 10 : 235-244, 2002

    24 Johnson, R, "Older adults’ participation in nursing home placement decisions" 19 (19): 358-375, 2010

    25 Pilgrim, D, "New mental health legislation for England and Wales: Some aspects of consensus and conflict" 36 : 79-95, 2006

    26 Cheek, J, "Moving them on and in: The process of searching for and selecting an aged care facility" 11 (11): 221-237, 2001

    27 Lykes, M. B, "Methodological challenges in participatory action research with undocumented central American migrants" 3 (3): 22-35, 2011

    28 Doyle, M, "Lessons from a community-based participatory action research project: Older people’s and researchers’ reflections" 32 : 244-263, 2010

    29 Reason, P, "Handbook of Action Research: Participative inquiry and practice" Sage 2001

    30 Change, Y. -P, "Decision-making process of nursing home placement among Chinese family caregivers" 46 (46): 108-118, 2010

    31 Shura, R, "Culture change in long-term care: Participatory action research and the role of resident" 51 (51): 212-225, 2010

    32 Minkler, M, "Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes" Jossey-Bass 2008

    33 Zayas, L. H, "Capacity-to-consent in psychiatric research: Development and preliminary testing of a screening test" 15 (15): 545-556, 2005

    34 ÓBrien, A. J, "Capacity, consent, and mental health legislation: Time for a new standard?" 34 (34): 237-247, 2010

    35 Saks, E. R, "Capacity to consent to or refuse treatment and/or research: Theoretical considerations" 24 : 411-429, 2006

    36 Ripley, S, "Capacity assessments on medical in-patients reffered to social workers for care home placement" 32 : 56-59, 2008

    37 Meiland, F. J, "Burden of delayed admission to psycho-geriatric nursing homes on patients and their informal caregivers" 10 (10): 218-223, 2001

    38 Etchells, E, "Assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment" 14 : 27-34, 1999

    39 Schmand, B, "Assessment of mental competency in community-dwelling elderly" 13 : 80-87, 1999

    40 Moye, J, "Assessment of decision-making capacity in older adults: An emerging area of practice and research" 62B (62B): P3-P11, 2007

    41 Shreve-Neiger, A. K, "Assessing the need for decision-making capacity education in hospitals and long term care settings" 34 : 359-371, 2008

    42 Grisso, T, "Assessing competence to consent to treatment: A guide for physicians and other health professionals" Oxford University Press 1998

    43 Cole, J, "Assessing capacity for admission to long-term care homes" Community Care Access Centres 2011

    44 Dawson, C, "Accessing mental capacity-a checklist for social workers" 12 (12): 5-20, 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.77 1.77 1.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.86 2.025 0.21
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼