후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 세계인의 원자력 수용성 태도변화 분석 = After Fukushima: Exploring the Attitude Change and Its Determinants about Acceptance of Nuclear Power

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Fukushima nuclear accidents brings out the attitude change toward nuclear power, which expect to change the energy policy. Our study will analyze the attitude change and it’s determinant related with acceptance of nuclear power by examine the survey data that Gallup International collected from 32,122 respondents across 47 countries. The results shows that first, the Fukushima accident decreases the acceptance. However, the degree of change depends on the strength of pre-attitude. Second, the female, household income, residence, TV, internet decreased acceptance whereas the perceived risk increased it. TV and internet are critical variables. Third, four groups classified based on degree of change, have the different determinants.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 서혁준, "후쿠시마 원전사고와 국민의 원자력에 대한 부정적 인식" 정부학연구소 19 (19): 321-361, 2013

2 왕재선, "후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 원자력 수용성 및 인식구조 변화에 대한 탐색적 분석" 한국행정학회 47 (47): 395-424, 2013

3 정주용, "후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 대국민 원자력 수용성 변화" 2011

4 김창수, "후쿠시마 원전 사고 후 방사선 및 원전에 대한 인식 분석" 한국콘텐츠학회 13 (13): 281-287, 2013

5 진상현, "한국과 독일의 원자력정책에 대한 비교연구: 정책흐름모형을 중심으로" 한국정책학회 21 (21): 265-290, 2012

6 강민아, "정책결정과정의 프레이밍에 대한 담론 분석: 방사성폐기물처리장입지 선정 과정을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 41 (41): 23-45, 2007

7 최연홍, "정책 수용성의 시간적 변화: 위도 방사성폐기물 처분방 입지 갈등 사례" 한국정책학회 13 (13): 297-319, 2004

8 정승연, "일본의 에너지정책 변화에 관한 연구: 후쿠시마 원전사고 이후를 중심으로" 한국세계지역학회 30 (30): 69-90, 2012

9 이진로, "일본 후쿠시마 원자력 발전소 사고와 사회적 소통" 한국소통학회 (16) : 188-213, 2011

10 정익재, "인터넷 환경에서 사회 이슈 증폭 현상의 정책적 의미 - 천성산 원효터널공사 사례 분석 -" 한국정책학회 19 (19): 327-352, 2010

11 이영애, "위험지각에 대한 한국인의 심리적 구조" 1-12, 2005

12 차용진, "위험인식모형과 원자력위험 - 심리측정패러다임 검증 및 적용" 한국정책학회 21 (21): 285-312, 2012

13 오미영, "위험을 수반한 과학기술의 낙인효과 : 원자력에 대한 위험인식이 방사선기술 이용 생산물에 대한위험인식과 수용에 미치는 영향" 한국언론학회 52 (52): 467-500, 2008

14 김서용, "위험과 편익을 넘어서: 원자력발전소 수용성에 대한 경험적 감정의 휴리스틱 효과" 한국행정학회 41 (41): 373-398, 2007

15 김서용, "위험과 편익사이에서 : 방폐장 수용성의 결정요인에 대한 분석" 한국행정연구원 15 (15): 297-330, 2006

16 김쾌희, "월성원자력 발전소 주변 지역 주민의 원전에 대한 인식 및 갈등 해소 방안" 한국지리환경교육학회 20 (20): 83-97, 2012

17 강윤재, "원전사고와 민주적 위험 거버넌스의 필요성" 비판사회학회 (91) : 12-39, 2011

18 김인숙, "원자력에 대한 위험인식과 지각된 지식, 커뮤니케이션 채널의 이용, 제 3자 효과가 낙관적 편견에 미치는 영향 ― 일본 후쿠시마 원전사고를 중심으로" 한국지역언론학회 12 (12): 79-106, 2012

19 심준섭, "원자력발전소 주변 지역주민의 갈등 프레임 분석: 후쿠시마 원전사고의 영향을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 45 (45): 173-202, 2011

20 김정훈, "원자력발전 및 방사선의 사회적 위험에 대한 인식분석" 한국산학기술학회 13 (13): 3570-3577, 2012

21 이현주, "원자력 발전소와 방폐장 낙인의 심리적 모형: 신뢰와 감정, 지식을 중심으로" 한국심리학회 30 (30): 831-851, 2011

22 심준섭, "원자력 발전소에 대한 신뢰, 인식된 위험과 혜택, 그리고 수용성" 한국정책학회 18 (18): 93-132, 2009

23 왕재선, "신뢰와 원자력 수용성" 한국정책학회 22 (22): 235-266, 2013

24 박방주, "방사선의 대국민 인식도 분석: 일본 후쿠시마 원전 사고 1주년 계기" 대한방사선방어학회 37 (37): 1-9, 2012

25 우형진, "문화계발이론의 ‘공명효과’ (resonance effect)에 대한 재 고찰: 위험인식에 대한 텔레비전 뉴스효과를 중심으로" 한국언론학회 50 (50): 254-276, 2006

26 Huang, L., "“Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident on The Risk Perception of Residents Near A Nuclear Power Plant in China" 110 (110): 19742-19747, 2013

27 Groot, J. I. M., "Values, Perceived Risk and Benefits, and Acceptability of Nuclear Energy" 33 (33): 307-317, 2013

28 Frewer, L. J., "Understanding Public Attitudes to Technology" 1 (1): 221-235, 1998

29 Slovic, P., "Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield" 19 (19): 689-701, 1999

30 Bronfman, N. C., "Trust, Acceptance and Knowledge of Technological and Environmental Hazards in Chile" 11 (11): 755-773, 2008

31 Flynn, J., "Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to High-level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model" 12 : 417-429, 1992

32 Kessides, Ioannis N., "The future Of the Nuclear Industry Reconsidered:Risks, Uncertainties, and Continued Promise" 48 : 185-208, 2012

33 Kasperson, R. E., "The Social Amplification of Risk A Conceptual Framework" 8 (8): 177-187, 1988

34 Kasperson, J. X, "The Social Amplification of Risk A Conceptual Framework" 8 (8): 177-187, 1988

35 Renn, O. B., "The Social Amplification of Risk : Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications" 48 (48): 137-160, 1992

36 Pidgeon, N. F., "The Social Amplification of Risk" Cambridge University Press 2003

37 Kunreuther, H., "The Role of Compensation in Siting Hazardous Facilities" 15 (15): 601-622, 1996

38 Frey, B. S., "The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals and Markets" 104 (104): 1297-1313, 1996

39 Milfont, T. L., "The Interplay Between Knowledge, Perceived Efficacy, and Concern About Global Warming and Climate Change :A One-Year Longitudinal Study" 32 (32): 1003-1020, 2012

40 Siegrist, M., "The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology" 20 (20): 195-203, 2000

41 Whitefield, S. C., "The Future of Nuclear Power: Value Orientations and Risk Perception" 29 (29): 425-437, 2009

42 Firestone. S., "The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution" Bantam 1970

43 Passino, E. M., "The Behavioral Basis of Design" Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross 1976

44 Slovic, P., "Social Theories of Risk" Praeger 1992

45 Dietz, T., "Social Structural and Social Psychological Bases of Environmental Concern" 30 (30): 450-471, 1998

46 Gardnera, G. T., "Risk and Benefit Perceptions, Acceptability Judgments, and Self-reported Actions toward Nuclear Power" 116 (116): 179-197, 1982

47 Barke, R. P., "Risk Perceptions of Men and Women Scientists" 78 (78): 167-176, 1997

48 Ho, J., "Risk Perception, Trust, and Factors Related to a Planned New Nuclear Power Plant in Taiwan after the 2011Fukushima Disaster" 33 (33): 773-789, 2013

49 Cha, Y. J., "Risk Perception in Korea: A Comparison with Japan and the United States" 3 (3): 321-332, 2000

50 McDaniels, T. L., "Risk Perception and the Value of Safety" 12 (12): 495-503, 1992

51 De Groot, J. I. M., "Relationships between Value Orientations, Self-determined Motivational Types and Pro-environmental Behavioural Intentions" 30 (30): 368-378, 2010

52 Katsuya, T., "Public Response to the Tokai Nuclear Accident" 21 (21): 1039-1045, 2001

53 Kunreuther, H., "Public Perceptions of Risk from the Proposed Nuclear Waste Repository" 30 (30): 17-33, 1988

54 Poortinga, W., "Public Attitudes to Nuclear Power and Climate Change in Britain Two Years after the Fukushima Accident"

55 Kahneman, D., "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk" 47 (47): 263-292, 1979

56 Slimak, M. W., "Personal Values, Beliefs, and Ecological Risk Perception" 26 (26): 1689-1705, 2006

57 Slovic, P., "Perception of Risk" 236 : 280-290, 1987

58 Slovic, P., "Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy" 13 (13): 675-682, 1993

59 Jenkins-Smith, H., "Perceived Risk and Uncertainty of Nuclear Waste: Differences Among Science, Business and Environmental Group Members" 14 (14): 851-856, 1994

60 Flynn, J., "Overcoming Tunnel Vision: Redirecting the U.S. High-Level Nuclear Waste Program" 39 (39): 6-11, 1997

61 Bassett Jr., G. W., "On-Site Storage of High Level Nuclear Waste: Attitude and Perceptions of Local Residents" 16 (16): 309-319, 1996

62 He, G., "Nuclear Power in China after Fukushima: Understanding Public Knowledge, Attitudes, and Trust" 17 (17): 435-451, 2012

63 Visschers, V. H. M, "Nuclear Power Before And After Fukushima: The Relations Between Acceptance, Ambivalence And Knowledge" 36 : 77-86, 2013

64 Black, R, "Nuclear Power 'Gets Little Public Support Worldwide"

65 Sjӧberg, "Limits of Knowledge and the Limited Importance of Trust" 21 (21): 189-198, 2001

66 Slovic, P., "Influence of Affective Processes on Toxicologists’Judgments of Risk" Decision Research 1997

67 Fischhoff, B., "How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits" 9 (9): 127-152, 1978

68 Flynn, J., "Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks" 14 (14): 1101-1108, 1994

69 Finucane, M., "Gender, Race, and Perceived risk: The 'White Male' Effect" 2 (2): 159-172, 2000

70 Davidson, D. J, "Gender and Environmental Risk Concerns: A Review and Analysis of Available Research" 28 (28): 302-339, 1996

71 Greenberg, M. R., "Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Effects Differ in Stressed vs. Nonstressed Environments" 15 (15): 503-511, 1995

72 Yamamura, E., "Experience of Technological and Natural Disaster and their Impact on the Perceived Risk of Nuclear Accidents After the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster in Japan 2011: A Cross-country Analysis" 41 : 360-363, 2012

73 Kempton, W., "Environmental Values in American Culture" MIT Press 1995

74 Kim, Y., "Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster on Global Public Acceptance of Nuclear Energy" 61 : 822-828, 2013

75 Brody, C. J., "Differences by Sex in Support for Nuclear Power" 63 (63): 209-228, 1984

76 Chung, J. B, "Competition, Economic Benefits, Trust, and Risk Perception in Siting a Potentially Hazardous Facility" 91 (91): 8-16, 2009

77 Slovic, P., "Behavioral Decision Theory Perspectives on Risk and Safety" 1 (1): 183-203, 1984

78 Balžekienė, A., "An Integration of Sociological Risk Theories Explaining the Nuclear Risk Perception in Lithuania" 2007

79 Newport, F, "Americans Still Favor Nuclear Power a Year After Fukushima"

80 Slovic, P., "Accident Pobabilities and Seat Belt Usage: A Psychological Perspective" 10 (10): 281-285, 1978

81 Siegrist, M., "Acceptance of Nuclear Power: The Fukushima Effect" 59 : 112-119, 2013

82 차용진, "AN ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR RISK PERCEPTION:WITH FOCUS ON DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE POLICY ALTERNATIVES" 한국행정학회 8 (8): 33-47, 2003

83 Alhakami, A. S, "A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefits" 14 (14): 1085-1096, 1994