RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    개정 자본시장법상 금융투자업자의 최선집행의무에 관한 고찰 = 다자간매매체결회사의 도입을 계기로

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act revised in 2013(hereinafter referred to as "the Act") introduced the Alternative Trading System(ATS), which led to many institutional changes. Especially, the Act imposed the duty of best execution upon financial investment entities, that is investment trader or investment broker.
    Since the duty of best execution is abstractly defined and provided, opinions in related business world are divided into in terms of how financial investment entities shall perform the duty of best execution in business environment. Therefore, this study places major emphasis on practical interpretation on provisions related to the duty of best execution in the Act.
    The concept of the duty of best execution is likely to vary as market environment is changed. It is not easy to specify and enact details of the duty of best execution in the form of a provision. So concentrating on various executive process of the duty of best execution, the Act provides procedures of performing the duty of best execution. The duty of best execution in §68 of the Act means differentiated order execution corresponding to various needs of investors, and this definition in § 68 of the Act is in accordance with the concept of best execution in economics. On the other hand, as the applicable scope of this duty is very limited or narrow, it is necessary greatly to expand applicable scope in order to accomplish the purpose of the Act.
    The duty of best execution can be explained in a concrete form as follows: the duty to draw up standards of best execution, the duty to disclose standards of best execution, the duty to execute given orders in accordance with standards of best execution, the duty to give manual for standards of best execution in advance, the duty to give report on order execution in accordance with standards of best execution.
    If financial investment entities fail in their duty of best execution, administrative penalties or civil responsibilities are imposed on them. It is necessary to introduce the administrative levy system against financial investment entities and class action for protecting investors.
    It is necessary to essentially review ATS, and then to set up an independent institution for market oversight to secure fairness of the market. And it is also necessary to extend and strengthen supervision system of self regulatory organization for inter-market competition and protection of investors.
    번역하기

    Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act revised in 2013(hereinafter referred to as "the Act") introduced the Alternative Trading System(ATS), which led to many institutional changes. Especially, the Act imposed the duty of best execution...

    Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act revised in 2013(hereinafter referred to as "the Act") introduced the Alternative Trading System(ATS), which led to many institutional changes. Especially, the Act imposed the duty of best execution upon financial investment entities, that is investment trader or investment broker.
    Since the duty of best execution is abstractly defined and provided, opinions in related business world are divided into in terms of how financial investment entities shall perform the duty of best execution in business environment. Therefore, this study places major emphasis on practical interpretation on provisions related to the duty of best execution in the Act.
    The concept of the duty of best execution is likely to vary as market environment is changed. It is not easy to specify and enact details of the duty of best execution in the form of a provision. So concentrating on various executive process of the duty of best execution, the Act provides procedures of performing the duty of best execution. The duty of best execution in §68 of the Act means differentiated order execution corresponding to various needs of investors, and this definition in § 68 of the Act is in accordance with the concept of best execution in economics. On the other hand, as the applicable scope of this duty is very limited or narrow, it is necessary greatly to expand applicable scope in order to accomplish the purpose of the Act.
    The duty of best execution can be explained in a concrete form as follows: the duty to draw up standards of best execution, the duty to disclose standards of best execution, the duty to execute given orders in accordance with standards of best execution, the duty to give manual for standards of best execution in advance, the duty to give report on order execution in accordance with standards of best execution.
    If financial investment entities fail in their duty of best execution, administrative penalties or civil responsibilities are imposed on them. It is necessary to introduce the administrative levy system against financial investment entities and class action for protecting investors.
    It is necessary to essentially review ATS, and then to set up an independent institution for market oversight to secure fairness of the market. And it is also necessary to extend and strengthen supervision system of self regulatory organization for inter-market competition and protection of investors.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 【초록】
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 최선집행의무의 개념과 적용범위
    • Ⅲ. 최선집행의무의 내용
    • Ⅳ. 최선집행의무 위반의 효과
    • 【초록】
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 최선집행의무의 개념과 적용범위
    • Ⅲ. 최선집행의무의 내용
    • Ⅳ. 최선집행의무 위반의 효과
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김용재, "투자중개⋅매매업자의 주의의무에 관한 연구-미국 Broker⋅Dealer의 의무를 참조하여-" 한국증권법학회 14 (14): 29-64, 2013

    2 김이수, "투자은행의 자가주문집행(Internalization) 영업의 허용 여부에 관한 고찰 - 유럽금융상품시장지침(MiFID)의 제정과 우리 법제에의 시사점 -" 법학연구소 50 (50): 83-115, 2009

    3 김정수, "자본시장법원론" SFL그룹 2014

    4 장근영, "자본시장법상 금융투자업자의 최선집행의무" 한국상사법학회 32 (32): 67-102, 2013

    5 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법(주석서Ⅰ)" 박영사 2009

    6 김건식, "자본시장법 제3판" 두성사 2013

    7 이인형, "자본시장법 개정에 따른 다자간매매체결회사의 등장과 파급효과" 한국거래소 2013

    8 송종준, "자본시장법 개정안 통과의 의미와 과제" 금융투자협회 2013

    9 김영도, "자본시장법 개정관련 제논점: 투자은행 활성화 및 ATS 도입을 중심으로" 한국금융학회 2011

    10 임재연, "자본시장법" 박영사 2014

    1 김용재, "투자중개⋅매매업자의 주의의무에 관한 연구-미국 Broker⋅Dealer의 의무를 참조하여-" 한국증권법학회 14 (14): 29-64, 2013

    2 김이수, "투자은행의 자가주문집행(Internalization) 영업의 허용 여부에 관한 고찰 - 유럽금융상품시장지침(MiFID)의 제정과 우리 법제에의 시사점 -" 법학연구소 50 (50): 83-115, 2009

    3 김정수, "자본시장법원론" SFL그룹 2014

    4 장근영, "자본시장법상 금융투자업자의 최선집행의무" 한국상사법학회 32 (32): 67-102, 2013

    5 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법(주석서Ⅰ)" 박영사 2009

    6 김건식, "자본시장법 제3판" 두성사 2013

    7 이인형, "자본시장법 개정에 따른 다자간매매체결회사의 등장과 파급효과" 한국거래소 2013

    8 송종준, "자본시장법 개정안 통과의 의미와 과제" 금융투자협회 2013

    9 김영도, "자본시장법 개정관련 제논점: 투자은행 활성화 및 ATS 도입을 중심으로" 한국금융학회 2011

    10 임재연, "자본시장법" 박영사 2014

    11 금융위원회, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 시행령 개정 추진"

    12 금융위원회, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 개정안 정무위 법안소위 통과"

    13 금융위원회, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 개정안 입법예고: (별첨) 우리나라 금융의 미래를 위한 자본시장법 개정 추진방안"

    14 김율, "자본시장 환경변화와 ‘가장성매매’ 규제-미국에서의 논의를 중심으로" 한국거래소 2013

    15 박중민, "바람직한 금융투자업 규제체계의 방향: 금융투자협회의 자율규제를 중심으로" 금융투자협회 2013

    16 엄경식, "미국주식시장의 재개편: Regulation NMS의 도입 및 시사점" 한국증권연구원 2007

    17 시장감시위원회 시장감시총괄부, "미국 주식시장 구조에 대한 미국 증권거래위원회(SEC) 개념 보고서" 한국거래소 시장감시위원회 2010

    18 정대익, "독일에서의 투자자보호 - 자본시장지침(MiFID)의 영향을 중심으로" 법학연구소 51 (51): 221-252, 2010

    19 엄경식, "대체거래시스템(ATS) 도입에 따른 과제" 한국기업법학회 27 (27): 9-42, 2013

    20 이인형, "대체거래시스템 전세계 동향과 시사점" 자본시장연구원 2011

    21 임병화, "대체거래소의 도입, 선택이 아닌 필수"

    22 이인형, "다자간매매체결회사 도입에 따른 시장분할 영향평가와 정책 시사점" 자본시장연구원 2013

    23 이인형, "다자간매매체결회사 도입 여건 점검" 자본시장연구원 2013

    24 이인형, "글로벌 거래소 변화양상과 시사점" 자본시장연구원 2012

    25 河本一郞, "金融商品取引法讀本" 有斐閣 2008

    26 近藤光男, "金融商品取引法入門" 商事法務 2009

    27 川村正幸, "金融商品取引法" 中央經濟社 2012

    28 河本一郞, "逐條解說證券取引法" 商事法務 2002

    29 中西健太郞, "証券取引法上の最良執行義務導入等に伴う關係政令等整備の槪要"

    30 行澤一人, "証券取引法における最良執行義務"

    31 木村眞生子, "米國の最良執行義務を巡る判例の展開-Newton事件判決後の諸相" 筑波大學大學院 (11) : 2012

    32 木村眞生子, "現代的 證券市場における最良執行義務" 日本證券經濟硏究所 (76) : 2011

    33 梅本剛正, "現代の證券市場と規制" 商事法務 2005

    34 大崎貞和, "最良執行義務とは何か" 野村資本市場硏究所 (春) : 1998

    35 神崎克郞, "投資者の注文の最良執行の確保" 大阪證券取引所 50 (50): 1997

    36 深見泰孝, "我が國のPTSの現狀と課題について" 日本證券經濟硏究所 2010

    37 高橋康文, "平成16年證券取引法改正のすべて" 第一法規 2005

    38 木村眞生子, "市場⋅取引所槪念の再構築-PTS規制の現狀と課題に關する一考察(下)" 日本證券經濟硏究所 (72) : 2010

    39 木村眞生子, "市場⋅取引所槪念の再構築-PTS規制の現狀と課題に關する一考察(上)" 日本證券經濟硏究所 (71) : 2010

    40 大崎貞和, "レギュレーションNMS提案について" 野村資本市場硏究所 (春) : 2004

    41 長島, "アドバンス 金融商品取引法" 商事法務 2009

    42 L. Harris, "Trading and Exchanges-Market Microstructure for Practitioners" Oxford University Press 2003

    43 Nicholas Wolfson, "The Stock Exchange Member: Liability for Violation of Stock Exchange Rules" 58 : 1120-, 1970

    44 Jonathan R. Macey, "The Law and Economics of Best Execution" 6 : 188-, 1997

    45 Allen Ferrell, "The Allocation of Investors’ Order and Inefficient Market Copetition: A Proposal" Harvard Law School, Law and Economics 2000

    46 Richard W. Jennings, "Securities Regulation" Foundation Press 1998

    47 SEC, "Securities Exchange Act"

    48 SEC, "Securities Exchange Act"

    49 SEC, "Regulation NMS"

    50 SEC, "Reference to Rating of Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations"

    51 CSA, "Notice of Proposed Amendments to NI 21-101 Marketplace Operation and NI 23-101 Trading Rules"

    52 CSA, "National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation (NI 21-101) Companion Policy 21-101CP and National Instrument 23-101 Trading Rules (NI 23-101) and Companion Policy 23-101CP"

    53 NASD, "NASD Notice to Members 97-57"

    54 NASD, "NASD Notice to Members 01-22"

    55 SEC, "MARKET 2000: An Examination of Current Equity Market Developments"

    56 FSA, "Implementing MiFID’s best execution requirements" 2006

    57 Michael A. Perino, "Fraud and Federalism: Preempting Private State Securities Fraud Causes of Action" 50 : 273-, 1998

    58 Tamar T. Frankel, "Fiduciary Law" Oxford University Press 2010

    59 시장감시위원회 시장감시지원부, "EU의 금융상품시장지침(MiFID) 주요내용" 한국증권선물거래소 2007

    60 神山哲也, "EU金融商品市場指令の歐州資本市場への影響" 野村資本市場硏究所 (Winter) : 2007

    61 大橋善晃, "EU金融商品市場指令(MiFID)と最良執行義務" 日本證券經濟硏究所 2006

    62 Brian J. Wanamaker, "Class Actions and Rule 10b-5: A Critique of Newton v. Merrill Lynch" 80 : 997-, 2002

    63 CESR, "CESR’s Draft Technical Advice on Possible Implementing Measures of the Directive 2004/39/EC on Markets in Financial Instruments" CESR 2005

    64 Norman S. Poser, "Broker-Dealer Law and Regulation" Aspen 2007

    65 David A. Lipton, "Best Execution: The National Market System’s Missing Ingredient" 57 : 449-, 1982

    66 FSA, "Best Execution, Consultation Paper 154(CP 154)"

    67 CESR, "Best Execution under MiFID-Questions & Answers" CESR 2007

    68 Wyane H. Wagner, "Best Execution" 49 (49): 1993

    69 European Commission, "Background Note for the draft MiFID Implementing Directive"

    70 강소현, "ATS 도입에 따른 합리적 최선집행원칙 도입방안" 자본시장연구원 2013

    71 송민규, "ATS 도입에 따른 관련 제도 정비방향" 한국금융연구원 2011 (2011): 2011

    72 한재영, "ATS 도입관련 해외 최선집행의무 조사" 금융투자협회 (14) : 2012

    73 Allen Ferrell, "A Proposal for Solving the ‘Payment for Order Flow’ problem" 74 (74): 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-03-13 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Securities Law Association -> Korea Securities Law Association KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.08 1.08 1.36
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.22 1.15 1.36 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼