RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국과 미국의 상담윤리규정 비교 연구 = Comparison of Korean and American Ethical Standards in Counseling

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100201765

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Many of Korean counseling associations borrowed their ethical standards from either the United States of America or Germany. So did Korean Christian counseling associations. For this reason, Christian counseling associations in Korea have not been able to identify their own Christian ethical principles and standards in counseling appropriate to their cultures. As professional Christian counseling has been developed in Korea, the number of Christian counselors hear also increases. It is evident that they need biblically-oriented ethical Christian counseling principles and standards in order to deal with various ethical dilemmas in the field. This study aimed to review and compare ethical principles and standards between Korean versus the USA as well as Christian versus non-Christian perspectives. For this purpose, several American and Korean ethical principles and standards were compared. American ethics are from American Psychological Association, American Counseling Association, Christian Association for Psychological Studies, and American Association of Christian Counselors. Korean ethical principles and standards are from Korean Psychological Association, Korean Counseling Psychology Association, Korean Christian Counseling and Psychotherapy Association, and Korean Pastoral Counseling Association. In comparison with ethical standards in the USA, which are very specific and congruent with legal regulations, those in Korea do not appear to be concrete. In addition, Korean laws and regulations for counselors have not been established well. Biblical and ethical principles were reviewed from several sources. The suggested ethical principles include, but not limited to, God``s words, God``s authority, Jesus Christ as a modeling figure, work of the Holy Spirit, connection with church and community, sanctification, Christian leadership, commitment, social responsibility, and so forth. Christian ethical principles need to be comprehensive enough to embrace secular ethical principles suggested by professional associations. For ethical counseling, therapists need to make an ethical decision at any situation. Several ethical decision-making models were reviewed in order to help Christian counselors develop rational thought process including referencing ethical standards and legal regulations, identify alternative options, evaluate options, consult with others, and reflect outcomes. In addition, ethical characters are necessary for one to be an ethical Christian counselor. It is integral that Christian therapists consider their motivation, integrity, commitment, maturity, and so forth. Moral characters are critically important to Christian counselors which is congruent to biblical teaching. Moral characters are demonstrated by Jesus Christ and continuously emphasized throughout the Bible. Among various ethical issues, the most frequent ones were discussed according to ethical standards. In terms of competence, counselors and psychologists needs to assure their ability to provide psychological services based on their education, training, supervision, and license. It is recommended to maintain their competence through continuing education. It is very important for Christian counselors to keep their competence because they are called to their profession by God. Two critical issues in a therapeutic relationship were reviewed and discussed according to their ethical standards. First, ethical and unethical dual relationships were discussed. Considering cultural differences between Korean and the USA, it can be viewed slightly differently. However, the benefit of clients and objectivity of therapist are considered utmost in dealing with dual relationship issues. Second, sexual relationship between therapist and client was reviewed according to its ethical standards and legal responsibility. Signs of dangerous relationships were reviewed and suggestions were made on how to increase awareness of personal issues and prevent these issues. Lastly, confidentiality and its limits were reviewed with related ethical standards.
    번역하기

    Many of Korean counseling associations borrowed their ethical standards from either the United States of America or Germany. So did Korean Christian counseling associations. For this reason, Christian counseling associations in Korea have not been abl...

    Many of Korean counseling associations borrowed their ethical standards from either the United States of America or Germany. So did Korean Christian counseling associations. For this reason, Christian counseling associations in Korea have not been able to identify their own Christian ethical principles and standards in counseling appropriate to their cultures. As professional Christian counseling has been developed in Korea, the number of Christian counselors hear also increases. It is evident that they need biblically-oriented ethical Christian counseling principles and standards in order to deal with various ethical dilemmas in the field. This study aimed to review and compare ethical principles and standards between Korean versus the USA as well as Christian versus non-Christian perspectives. For this purpose, several American and Korean ethical principles and standards were compared. American ethics are from American Psychological Association, American Counseling Association, Christian Association for Psychological Studies, and American Association of Christian Counselors. Korean ethical principles and standards are from Korean Psychological Association, Korean Counseling Psychology Association, Korean Christian Counseling and Psychotherapy Association, and Korean Pastoral Counseling Association. In comparison with ethical standards in the USA, which are very specific and congruent with legal regulations, those in Korea do not appear to be concrete. In addition, Korean laws and regulations for counselors have not been established well. Biblical and ethical principles were reviewed from several sources. The suggested ethical principles include, but not limited to, God``s words, God``s authority, Jesus Christ as a modeling figure, work of the Holy Spirit, connection with church and community, sanctification, Christian leadership, commitment, social responsibility, and so forth. Christian ethical principles need to be comprehensive enough to embrace secular ethical principles suggested by professional associations. For ethical counseling, therapists need to make an ethical decision at any situation. Several ethical decision-making models were reviewed in order to help Christian counselors develop rational thought process including referencing ethical standards and legal regulations, identify alternative options, evaluate options, consult with others, and reflect outcomes. In addition, ethical characters are necessary for one to be an ethical Christian counselor. It is integral that Christian therapists consider their motivation, integrity, commitment, maturity, and so forth. Moral characters are critically important to Christian counselors which is congruent to biblical teaching. Moral characters are demonstrated by Jesus Christ and continuously emphasized throughout the Bible. Among various ethical issues, the most frequent ones were discussed according to ethical standards. In terms of competence, counselors and psychologists needs to assure their ability to provide psychological services based on their education, training, supervision, and license. It is recommended to maintain their competence through continuing education. It is very important for Christian counselors to keep their competence because they are called to their profession by God. Two critical issues in a therapeutic relationship were reviewed and discussed according to their ethical standards. First, ethical and unethical dual relationships were discussed. Considering cultural differences between Korean and the USA, it can be viewed slightly differently. However, the benefit of clients and objectivity of therapist are considered utmost in dealing with dual relationship issues. Second, sexual relationship between therapist and client was reviewed according to its ethical standards and legal responsibility. Signs of dangerous relationships were reviewed and suggestions were made on how to increase awareness of personal issues and prevent these issues. Lastly, confidentiality and its limits were reviewed with related ethical standards.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 노안영, "한국과 미국의 상담심리학자들이 지각하는 지혜의 비교" 한국상담학회 9 (9): 217-243, 1998

    2 최해림, "한국 상담자의 상담윤리에 대한 기초 연구" 한국상담심리학회 14 (14): 805-828, 2002

    3 한국기독교상담심리치료학회, "한국 기독교상담 심리치료학회 상담(치료사)윤리강령" 한국기독교상담 심리치료학회

    4 한국상담심리학회, "전문적상담현장의윤리" 학지사 2010

    5 금명자, "전문적상담현장의윤리" 학지사 2010

    6 금명자, "전문적상담현장의윤리" 학지사 2010

    7 유영권, "전문적상담현장의윤리" 학지사 2010

    8 한국목회상담협회, "윤리강령" 한국목회상담협회

    9 방기연, "상담철학과윤리" 학지사 2013

    10 공윤정, "상담철학과 윤리" 학지사 2013

    1 노안영, "한국과 미국의 상담심리학자들이 지각하는 지혜의 비교" 한국상담학회 9 (9): 217-243, 1998

    2 최해림, "한국 상담자의 상담윤리에 대한 기초 연구" 한국상담심리학회 14 (14): 805-828, 2002

    3 한국기독교상담심리치료학회, "한국 기독교상담 심리치료학회 상담(치료사)윤리강령" 한국기독교상담 심리치료학회

    4 한국상담심리학회, "전문적상담현장의윤리" 학지사 2010

    5 금명자, "전문적상담현장의윤리" 학지사 2010

    6 금명자, "전문적상담현장의윤리" 학지사 2010

    7 유영권, "전문적상담현장의윤리" 학지사 2010

    8 한국목회상담협회, "윤리강령" 한국목회상담협회

    9 방기연, "상담철학과윤리" 학지사 2013

    10 공윤정, "상담철학과 윤리" 학지사 2013

    11 유형근, "상담자윤리" 학지사 2009

    12 김옥진, "상담윤리 결정모델을 통한 상담자 윤리교육의 필요성" 한국교육포럼(아시아태평양교육학회) 10 (10): 141-168, 2011

    13 박외숙, "비성적(非性的)인 이중관계의 윤리" 한국상담심리학회 19 (19): 863-887, 2007

    14 Collins, Gary R, "뉴 크리스천 카운슬링" 두란노 2008

    15 오윤선, "기독교상담 윤리교육 활성화 방안 연구" 한국복음주의상담학회 6 : 7-34, 2006

    16 Collins, Gary R., "기독교 상담윤리" 두란노 1996

    17 Geisler, Norman, "기독교 상담윤리" 두란노 1996

    18 Kitchener, Karen S., "Teaching Applied Ethics in Counselor Education: An Integration of Psychological Processes and Philosophical Analysis" 64 : 306-310, 1986

    19 Christian Association for Psychological Studies, "Statement of Ethical Guidelines"

    20 Zelen, Seymour L., "Sexualization of Therapeutic Relationships: The Dual Vulnerability of Patient and Therapist" 22 : 178-185, 1985

    21 Pope, Kenneth S., "Sexual Feelings in Psychotherapy: Explorations for Therapists and Therapists-in- Training" APA 1993

    22 Pope, Kenneth S., "Sexual Attraction to Clients: The Human Therapist and the (Sometimes) Inhuman Training System" 96-111, 2006

    23 Ivey, Laurie C., "Resolving the Dilemma of Multiple Relationships for Primary Care Behavioral Health Providers" 44 : 218-224, 2013

    24 Fisher, Mary Alice, "Protecting Confidentiality Rights: The Need for an Ethical Practice Model" 63 : 1-13, 2008

    25 Zur, Ofer, "On Law-Imposed Dual Relationships"

    26 Rest, James R., "Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1994

    27 Rae, Scott B, "Moral Choices: An Introduction to Ethics" Zondervan 2000

    28 Younggren, Jeffrey N., "Managing Risk When Contemplating Multiple Relationships" 35 : 255-260, 2004

    29 Somberg, Daniel R., "Informed Consent: Therapists' Beliefs and Practices" 24 : 153-159, 1993

    30 Kitchener, Karen S., "Foundations of Ethical Practice, Research, and Teaching in Psychology and Counseling" Routledge 2011

    31 Jordan, Augustus E., "Ethics and the Professional Practice of Psychologists: The Role of Virtues and Principles" 21 : 107-114, 1990

    32 American Psychological Association, "Ethics Committee, Report of the Ethics Committee, 2011" 67 : 398-408, 2012

    33 American Psychological Association, "Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct" APA 2010

    34 Lazarus, Arnold A., "Dual Relationships and Psychotherapy" Springer 2002

    35 American Association of Christian Counselors, "Code of Ethics"

    36 Hawkinds, Ioma L., "Christian Counseling Ethics: A Handbook for Therapists, Pastors & Counselors" IVP 1997

    37 McMinn, Mark R., "Christian Counseling Ethics: A Handbook for Therapists, Pastors & Counselors" IVP 1997

    38 Sanders, Randolph K., "Christian Counseling Ethics: A Handbook for Therapists, Pastors & Counselors" IVP 1997

    39 Beck, James R., "Christian Counseling Ethics: A Handbook for Therapists, Pastors & Counselors" IVP 1997

    40 Lukens, Horace C. Jr, "Christian Counseling Ethics: A Handbook for Therapists, Pastors & Counselors" IVP 1997

    41 Shackelford, John F., "Christian Counseling Ethics: A Handbook for Therapists, Pastors & Counselors" IVP 86-102, 1997

    42 Butman, Richard E., "Christian Counseling Ethics: A Handbook for Therapists, Pastors & Counselors" IVP 1997

    43 Gottlieb, M. C., "Avoiding Exploitive Dual Relationships: A Decision- Making Model" 30 : 41-48, 1993

    44 American Counseling Association, "ACA Code of Ethics" ACA

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2020-09-17 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국기독교상담학회 -> 한국복음주의상담학회
    영문명 : Korean Christian Counseling Association -> Korean Evangelical Counseling Society
    KCI등재
    2019-12-12 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국복음주의상담학회 -> 한국기독교상담학회
    영문명 : Korea Evangelical Counseling Society -> Korean Christian Counseling Association
    KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-02-17 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국복음주의 기독교상담학회 -> 한국복음주의상담학회 KCI등재
    2015-02-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Gospel and Counseling -> Journal of Counseling and Gospel KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.66
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.65 0.67 0.824 0.18
    더보기
    해외이동버튼