낮은 사회경제적 배경을 가진 학생들의 학업성취도에 대한 학교효과 = School context effect on achievement of students with low socioeconomic background

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Using the third wave from the Korean Education Longitudinal Study (KELS:2005) data, this study examined the effects of school contextual factors, such as the percentage of high achieving students and of extremely poor families, on academic achievement. Based on previous findings that the relationship between an individual’s family background and achievement differs according to the type of school attended, this study explored the interaction effect between the two school contextual factors and a student’s socioeconomic background. Results showed that students with low SES gained lower test scores, especially in English and math, than their counterparts in an “elite” school (i.e., a school with a high proportion of talented students), suggesting that the competitive atmosphere and normative environment of a school do not reduce the achievement gap among socioeconomic classes. For the low SES students, the negative school context effect of the school may be related to the relative deprivation they experience.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 연구는 ‘한국교육종단연구2005’의 중학교 3학년 자료를 사용하여, 학교내 상위권 학생 집중도와 경제적 빈곤학생 비율이 학생들의 학업성취도에 미치는 효과를 분석하였다. 학교요인, 특히 학교 구성 변인들이 학생들의 교육결과에 영향을 미치는 방식이 개인의 사회경제적 배경에 따라 달라질 수 있다는 이론적 관점을 바탕으로, 수준간 상호작용효과(cross-level interaction effect)를 탐색하였다. 연구의 결과는 상위권 학생들의 비율이 높은 학교에서 사회경제적으로 취약한 계층의 아이들의 비율이 낮음을 보여주었다. 평균적인 성취수준이 높은 학교에 다니는 것이 학생들의 학업성취에 유리한 것으로 조사되었다. 그러나 낮은 사회경제적 배경을 가진 아이들은 “공부 잘하는 학교”에서 불이익을 경험하고 있었다. 특히 영어와 수학과목에서 그들은 평균적인 학업성적이 높거나 빈곤비율이 낮은 학교에서 상대적으로 더욱 낮은 성취도를 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 낮은 배경을 가진 아이들에게 학교는 규범적인 환경을 통해 긍정적인 역할을 하기보다 상대적 박탈감을 제공함으로써 계층간 학습격차를 증가시키는 부정적인 역할을 하고 있음을 확인하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김경근, "한국사회 교육격차의 실태 및 결정요인" 한국교육사회학회 15 (15): 1-27, 2005

2 성기선, "중학생들의 학업성취도에 미치는 가정배경의 영향력 변화에 관한 연구" 한국교육사회학회 20 (20): 83-103, 2010

3 김성식, "중학교 학생들의 학업 성취에 대한 학교 효과의 탐색: 수월성과 평등성의 측면에서" 263-286, 2007

4 성기선, "우리나라 중학교의 학교효과에 관한 연구:Creemers의 학교효과 이론모델의 검증" 한국교육사회학회 16 (16): 93-114, 2006

5 류방란, "교육격차: 가정배경과 학교교육의 영향력 분석" 한국교육개발원 2006

6 White,K.R, "The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement" 91 (91): 461-481, 1982

7 Espenshade, T.J., "The frog pond revisited: High school academiccontext, class rank, and elite college admission" 78 (78): 269-293, 2005

8 Bourdieu,P, "The forms of capital" Greenwood 241-258, 1986

9 Kreft, I.G.G., "The effect of different forms of centering inhierarchical linear models" 30 (30): 1-21, 1995

10 Davis, J, "The campus as a frog pond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation tocareer decision of college men" 72 (72): 17-31, 1966

11 Schneider, B, "The Ambitious Generation: America's Teenagers, Motivated butDirectionless" Yale University Press 1999

12 Eagle,E, "Socioeconomic status, family structure, and parental involvement: The correlates ofachievement" Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American EducationalResearch Association 1989

13 Sirin,S.R, "Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review ofresearch" 75 (75): 417-453, 2005

14 Duncan, O.D., "Socioeconomic background and achievement" Seminar Press 1972

15 Alexander, K.L., "School SES influences:Composition or context" 52 (52): 222-237, 1979

16 Ogbu,J, "Racial stratification and education in the United States: Why inequality persists" 96 (96): 264-298, 1994

17 Snijders, T, "Multilevel Analysis:An Introduction to Basic and AdvancedMultilevel Modeling" SAGE 1999

18 Mueller, C.W, "Measures of socioeconomic status: Alternatives andrecommendations" 52 (52): 13-30, 1981

19 Ganzeboom, H.B, "Internationally comparable measures of occupational statusfor the 1988 international standard classification of occupations" 25 : 201-239, 1996

20 Crosnoe, R, "Immigration from Mexico, school composition, andadolescent functioning" 48 (48): 1-24, 2005

21 Meyer,J.W, "High school effects on college intentions" 76 (76): 59-70, 1970

22 Thornton, C.H, "High school contextual effects for Black and White students:A research note" 53 (53): 247-252, 1980

23 Alexander, K.L, "High school context and college selectivity: Institutionalconstraints in educational stratification" 56 (56): 166-188, 1977

24 Nelson,J.I, "High school context and college plans: The impact of social structure onaspirations" 37 (37): 143-148, 1972

25 Pong,S, "Family structure, school context, and eight-grade math and reading achievement" 59 (59): 734-746, 1997

26 Coleman, J.S., "Equality of educational opportunity" Government Printing Office 1966

27 Lee, V.E, "Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains inachievement and engagement" 68 (68): 241-270, 1995

28 Marsh, H.W, "Determinants of self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively largefish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well" 47 : 213-231, 1984

29 Lee, V.E, "Curriculum tracking as mediating the social distribution of high schoolachievement" 61 (61): 78-94, 1988

30 Alexander, K.L, "Contextual effects in the high school attainment process" 40 (40): 402-416, 1975

31 Wells,R, "Children of immigrants and educational expectations: The roles of schoolcomposition" 112 (112): 1679-1704, 2010

32 Enders, C.K, "Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models:A new look at an old issue.Psychological" 12 (12): 121-138, 2007

33 Lee, V.E, "A multilevel model of the social distribution of high schoolachievement" 62 (62): 172-192, 1989

34 Raudenbush, S, "A hierarchical model for studying school effects" 59 (59): 1-17, 1986