RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      온라인 학습 환경에서 문제해결 단계별 스캐폴딩 유형의 효과 분석 = The Effects of Scaffolding Types on the Problem-Solving Phases in an online learning environment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959561

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to investigate effects of the three scaffolding types, such as ‘providing an explanation scaffolding’, ‘providing a cue scaffolding’, and ‘inviting student participation’ in the problem-solving phases in an online learning environment which requires the learner to actively participate in the process of solving given problems. The research questions of this study were addressed that are meaningful differences in the four phases of problem-solving which are ‘problem comprehension’, ‘developing solution’,?applying solution’, and ‘reviewing’ phase among the three different scaffolding types. To answer these questions, this study performed an experiment on the 124 students who were taking a teacher training course out of three universities in the seoul metropolitan area. Instruments and environments used to find effects of the treatment were the problem solving process test, an ill-structured problem, the three scaffolding types, an online learning program, and the evaluating tool of the problem solving process. One-way ANOVA was conducted to analyze the data. The result of this study were summarized as follows: (1) ‘Providing an explanation scaffolding’ type applied in this study was found statistically meaningful positive effects on?problem comprehension’ phase. (2) There was no significant differences in the?developing solution’ phase, among three different groups that they were provided the three different scaffolding type. (3) ‘Providing a cue scaffolding’ type applied in this study was found statistically meaningful positive effects on?applying solution’ phase. (4) There was no significant differences in the ‘reviewing’ phase, among three different groups that they were provided the three different scaffolding type.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to investigate effects of the three scaffolding types, such as ‘providing an explanation scaffolding’, ‘providing a cue scaffolding’, and ‘inviting student participation’ in the problem-solving phases in an onl...

      The purpose of this study is to investigate effects of the three scaffolding types, such as ‘providing an explanation scaffolding’, ‘providing a cue scaffolding’, and ‘inviting student participation’ in the problem-solving phases in an online learning environment which requires the learner to actively participate in the process of solving given problems. The research questions of this study were addressed that are meaningful differences in the four phases of problem-solving which are ‘problem comprehension’, ‘developing solution’,?applying solution’, and ‘reviewing’ phase among the three different scaffolding types. To answer these questions, this study performed an experiment on the 124 students who were taking a teacher training course out of three universities in the seoul metropolitan area. Instruments and environments used to find effects of the treatment were the problem solving process test, an ill-structured problem, the three scaffolding types, an online learning program, and the evaluating tool of the problem solving process. One-way ANOVA was conducted to analyze the data. The result of this study were summarized as follows: (1) ‘Providing an explanation scaffolding’ type applied in this study was found statistically meaningful positive effects on?problem comprehension’ phase. (2) There was no significant differences in the?developing solution’ phase, among three different groups that they were provided the three different scaffolding type. (3) ‘Providing a cue scaffolding’ type applied in this study was found statistically meaningful positive effects on?applying solution’ phase. (4) There was no significant differences in the ‘reviewing’ phase, among three different groups that they were provided the three different scaffolding type.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한아름, "중학교 수학과 문제중심학습에서 스캐폴딩 유형이 문제해결과정의 학업성취도에 미치는 영향" 중앙대학교 교육대학원 2012

      2 林正勳, "웹 기반 문제해결학습 환경에서 소집단 협동학습전략이 온라인 토론의 참여도와 문제해결에 미치는 효과" 서울大學校 大學院 1999

      3 안수경, "시각적․공간적 작동기억 수준과 스캐폴딩 유형이 수학 문장제 성취에 미치는 효과" 한국교육공학회 29 (29): 161-183, 2013

      4 성일제, "사고교육지침서" 한국교육개발원 1990

      5 남경희, "문제해결학습 수업모형의 구상과 적용" 서울교육대학교 초등교육연구소 2000

      6 李在信, "문제해결과정과 문제해결 성취와의 관계에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 1980

      7 김경희, "문제중심학습(PBL)의 수업 단계별 학습활동의 특성과 교육적 의미 탐색 - 초등 과학 수업을 중심으로 -" 한국초등교육학회 21 (21): 269-296, 2008

      8 홍미영, "문제의 특성에 다른 대학생들의 화학 문제해결과정의 차이 분석" 15 (15): 80-91, 1994

      9 전경문, "문제 해결 전략과 해결자·청취자 활동 : 화학 수업에서의 교수효과 및 소집단 문제 해결 과정" 서울대학교 대학원 1999

      10 도상오, "기업교육에서 스캐폴딩 활용의 문제해결단계별 효과 분석" 한국기업교육학회 14 (14): 65-90, 2012

      1 한아름, "중학교 수학과 문제중심학습에서 스캐폴딩 유형이 문제해결과정의 학업성취도에 미치는 영향" 중앙대학교 교육대학원 2012

      2 林正勳, "웹 기반 문제해결학습 환경에서 소집단 협동학습전략이 온라인 토론의 참여도와 문제해결에 미치는 효과" 서울大學校 大學院 1999

      3 안수경, "시각적․공간적 작동기억 수준과 스캐폴딩 유형이 수학 문장제 성취에 미치는 효과" 한국교육공학회 29 (29): 161-183, 2013

      4 성일제, "사고교육지침서" 한국교육개발원 1990

      5 남경희, "문제해결학습 수업모형의 구상과 적용" 서울교육대학교 초등교육연구소 2000

      6 李在信, "문제해결과정과 문제해결 성취와의 관계에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 1980

      7 김경희, "문제중심학습(PBL)의 수업 단계별 학습활동의 특성과 교육적 의미 탐색 - 초등 과학 수업을 중심으로 -" 한국초등교육학회 21 (21): 269-296, 2008

      8 홍미영, "문제의 특성에 다른 대학생들의 화학 문제해결과정의 차이 분석" 15 (15): 80-91, 1994

      9 전경문, "문제 해결 전략과 해결자·청취자 활동 : 화학 수업에서의 교수효과 및 소집단 문제 해결 과정" 서울대학교 대학원 1999

      10 도상오, "기업교육에서 스캐폴딩 활용의 문제해결단계별 효과 분석" 한국기업교육학회 14 (14): 65-90, 2012

      11 조혜진, "Web 2.0 환경에서의 효율적인 인터페이스 디자인에 관한 연구 : 통합 커뮤니티 사이트를 중심으로" 한양대학교 대학원 2007

      12 McNaughton, S., "The shifting focus of maternal tutoring across different difficulty levels on a problem-solving task" 8 : 147-155, 1990

      13 Wood, D., "The role of tutoring in problem solving" 17 : 89-100, 1976

      14 Voss, J. F., "The nature of expertise" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 261-285, 1988

      15 Gagné, R. M., "The condition of learning and theory of instruction" Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1985

      16 Cho, K. L., "The Effect Of Argumentation Scaffolds On Argumentation And Problem Solving" 50 (50): 5-22, 2002

      17 Bixler, B. T., "Supporting college students' ill-structured problem-solving in a web-based learning environment" 39 (39): 2010-2011, 2010

      18 Ge, X., "Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes on an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions" Pennsylvania State University 2001

      19 Rachel, R., "Scaffolding as a Teaching Strategy" 5 : 2-13, 2002

      20 Ge, X., "Scaffolding Students' Problem-Solving Processes in an ill-Structured Task Using Question Prompts and Peer Interactions" 51 (51): 21-38, 2003

      21 Davis, E. A., "Scaffolding Student's Knowledge integration : Prompts for reflection in KIE" 22 (22): 819-837, 2000

      22 Hogan, K., "Scaffolding Student Learning: Instructional Approaches and Issues" Brookline Books 74-103, 1997

      23 Roehler, L. R., "Scaffolding Student Learning: Instructional Approaches and Issues" Brookline Books 1997

      24 Rosson, M. B., "Scaffolded Examples for Learning Object - Oriented Design. Association for Computing Machinery" ABI/INFORM global 39 (39): 46-, 1996

      25 Chen, C., "Prompting college students' knowledge acquisition and ill-structured problem-solving : Web-based integration and procedure prompts" 55 : 292-303, 2010

      26 Bull, K. S., "Process for Developing Scaffolding in a Computer Mediated Learning Environment" 19 : 1999

      27 Hmlo, C., "Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions" Lawrence Erlbaum 2000

      28 Krulik, S., "Problem solving: A handbook for senior highschool teachers" Allyn & Bacon 1987

      29 Potes, P. R, "Mother-child interaction across culture: From intersubjectivity to regulation in the zone of proximal development" 1991

      30 Linn, M. C., "Making programming instruction cognitively demanding : An intervention study" 23 (23): 427-436, 1986

      31 Flick, L. B., "Integrating Elements of inquiry into the Flow of Middle Level Teaching" 1998 : 19-22, 1998

      32 Hannafin, M., "Instructional-design theories and models. 2" Erlbuam 115-140, 1999

      33 Jonassen, D. H, "Instructional design models for well-structured and Ill-structured problem solving learning outcomes" 45 (45): 64-94, 1997

      34 Newell, A., "Human problem solving" Prentice-Hall 1972

      35 Dewey, J., "How to think" D. C. Heath & Co 1933

      36 Polya, "How to solve it" Princeton university Press 1957

      37 Bardwell, L. V., "Environmental problem solving: Theory, practice, and possibilities in environmental education" NAAEE 1994

      38 Oliver, K., "Developing and Refining Mental Models in Open Ended Learning Environments: A Case Study" 49 (49): 5-32, 1991

      39 Hooper, S., "Cooperative learning and computer-based instruction" 40 (40): 21-38, 1992

      40 박성익, "Analysis of peer-scaffolding patterns in four phases of problem-solving in web-based instruction" 교육종합연구원 17 : 1-30, 2008

      41 Williams, M. D., "A comprehensive Review of Learner-Control: The role of learner characteristics" 15 : 1083-1114, 1993

      42 Wood, D. J., "A Study of assisted problem solving" 66 : 181-191, 1976

      43 Ge, X., "A Conceptual Framework for Scaffolding Ill-Structured Problem-Solving Processes Using Question Prompts and Peer Interactions. Educational Technology" 52 (52): 5-22, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼