고교선택제가 배정결과만족도 및학교만족도에 미치는 영향 = The effects of high school choice on the levels of school and assignment satisfaction

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Despite growing interest in the school choice especially since 2010 when the high school choice policy was introduced in Seoul, few studies are performed to investigate on the outcomes of school choice. While most of the school choice researches have been limited to such topics as the effectiveness or pitfalls of the school choice itself, the effects of the school choice on students and parents has been rarely conducted. Thus, this study examines the effects of school choice on the level of assignment satisfaction and that of school satisfaction. Data was collected from 34 high schools in the city of Seoul. The multi-level modeling was employed as a major research method. As a result, the research findings are as follows. First, the level of school satisfaction is more likely to grow when students and parents chose the high schools taking into account more on the commuting distance, chances of getting accepted into quality university, and learning atmosphere. Second, the more students could get into the preferential school option and chose the schools based on their own decision, the higher the level of school satisfaction is. Third, the level of assignment satisfaction and that of school satisfaction respectively have a close relationship with the degree of preference of particular high school. Finally, authors argue that the school choice policy is likely to deepen the gaps between the popular high school option and less preferred school.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

2010학년도부터 서울 전역에 고교선택제가 도입되면서 학교선택제에 대한 관심이 재점화되었지만, 학교선택의 성과를 살펴본 연구는 상당히 미흡한 실정이다. 그간 학교선택제에 관한 논의는 주로 선택제의 기대효과나 문제점에 대한 지적이 주를 이루었으며, 학교선택제가 학생ㆍ학부모에게 어떠한 영향을 미치는지에 관한 논의는 제한되어 있었다. 본 연구는 이러한 문제의식에서 출발하여, 배정결과만족도와 학교만족도를 준거지표로 설정하고 고교선택제가 학생ㆍ학부모가 체감하는 만족도에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 체계적으로 고찰하고자 수행되었다. 이를 위해 서울시 교육청 관내 34개 고등학교를 대상으로 수집된 데이터를 활용하여 다층모형(multilevel modeling) 분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 통학거리, 대학 진학 성과 및 학습분위기 등을 적극적으로 고려하여 학교를 선택할수록 학교만족도가 높아지는 경향이 있었고, 우선적으로 지원한 학교에 배정될수록, 본인이 진학할 학교를 직접 선택할수록 배정결과에 대한 만족도가 제고되는 것으로 파악되었다. 한편 학교수준에서는 선호학교 여부가 배정결과만족도 및 학교만족도와 밀접한 관련이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이 같은 결과를 토대로 본 연구에서는 고교선택제가 기존의 선호학교와 비선호학교의 분화를 더욱 심화시킬 가능성이 큼을 지적하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 성열관, "호모 에코노미쿠스 시대의 교육 : 교육과정과 학교에 대한 시장선택 논쟁" 문음사 2004

2 김경근, "학교선택제와 교육평등" 한국교육사회학회 12 (12): 1-23, 2002

3 남경희, "학교선택제 도입과 전망" 4-7, 2009

4 이광현, "학교선택이 수학학업성취도에 미치는 영향 분석: PISA 자료 분석을 중심으로" 한국교육사회학회 17 (17): 87-107, 2007

5 김정숙, "학교선택의 결정요인 및 학교만족도 효과: 서울시교육청의 고교선택제를 중심으로" 2012

6 전우홍, "학교선택요인이 학업성취에 미치는 영향: 한국교육고용패널의 위계적 선형모형 연구" 한국교육재정경제학회 14 (14): 109-135, 2005

7 김윤태, "학교 선택 정책에 관한 분석적 연구" 14 (14): 232-264, 1996

8 성기선, "평준화의 위기와 해법" 4 (4): 142-165, 2009

9 김정숙, "중3 학부모의 고등학교 선택 동기 결정요인" 한국교육개발원 37 (37): 5-27, 2010

10 김수경, "우리나라 고등학교 학교선택 정책논리 분석" 한국교육행정학회 26 (26): 103-124, 2008

11 위권일, "서울특별시 후기 고등학교 학교 배정 방안 연구" 서울시교육청 2011

12 주현준, "서울시교육청 학교선택권 확대 정책의 실효성 분석-미국의 개방형등록제 분석 준거의 관점에서-" 한국비교교육학회 20 (20): 153-174, 2010

13 김영식, "서울시 일반계고 학교선택권 확대 정책의 의의와 전망" (197) : 8-12, 2009

14 손흥숙, "마산과 창원지역 학부모의 고등학교 선택 과정과 결과 분석" 8 (8): 57-74, 1998

15 김영화, "교육사회학" 교육과학사 2010

16 염철현, "공교육의 위기와 학교 선택권의 확장" 39 (39): 141-154, 2001

17 김경년, "개방등록제를 통한 비거주지 학교 선택이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향: 무작위배정을 통한 실험적인 접근의 결과" 한국교육재정경제학회 21 (21): 161-190, 2012

18 Bechely, A., "To know otherwise: A study of the social organization of parents’ work for public school choice" University of California-Los Angeles 1999

19 Gintis, H., "The political economy of school choice" 96 (96): 492-511, 1995

20 Moore, D., "The new improved sorting machine" National Center on Effective Secondary Schools 1990

21 Good, T.L., "The great school debate: choice, vouchers, and charters" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2000

22 Belfield, C., "The effects of competition between schools on educational outcomes : a review for the United States" 72 (72): 279-341, 2002

23 Greene, J.P., "The effectiveness of school choice in Milwaukee: A secondary analysis of data from the program's evaluation" ERIC 1996

24 Martinez, V., "The consequences of school choices : Who leaves and who stays in the inner city" 76 : 485-501, 1995

25 May, J. J., "The charter school allure: Can traditional schools measure up?" 39 (39): 19-45, 2006

26 Gamoran, A., "Students achievement in public magnet, public comprehensive, and private city high schools" 18 : 1-18, 1996

27 Moe, T., "Schools, vouchers, and the American public" Brookings Institution 2001

28 OECD, "Schools : A matter of choice" OECD, Center for Educational Research and Innovation 1994

29 Lauder, H., "School system responses to external change: Implications for parental choice of schools, In Choice and diversity in schooling: Perspectives and prospects" Routhledge 1997

30 Carnoy, M., "School choice? or is it privatization?" 29 (29): 15-20, 2000

31 Brighouse, H., "School choice and social justice" Oxford University Press 2000

32 Henig, J., "Rethinking school choice" Princeton University Press 1994

33 Chubb, J., "Politics, markets and America’s schools" Brookings Institute 1990

34 Hastings, J.S., "Parental Preferences and School Competition: Evidence from a Public School Choice Program" NBER 2005

35 Gewirtz, S., "Markets, choice and equity in education" Open University Press 1995

36 Lubienski, C., "Innovation in education markets : theory and evidence on the impact of competition and choice in charter Schools" 40 (40): 395-443, 2003

37 Raudenbush, S.W., "Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods(2nd ed.)" Sage Publications 2002

38 Molnar, A., "Giving Kids the Business: The commercialization of America’s schools" Westview Press 1996

39 Witte, J.F., "Fifth-year report: Milwaukee parental choice program. Department of Political Science and The Robert M. La Follette Institute of Public Affairs" University of Wisconsin-Madison 1995

40 Malone, M., "Fact, figures and faces: a look at Minnesota's school choice programs" University of Minnesota Center for School Change 1993

41 Finnigan, K., "Evaluation of the public charter schools program: Final report" US Department of Education, Office of the Deputy Secretary 2004

42 Coons, J., "Education by choice" University of California Press 1978

43 Apple, M. W., "Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality(2nd ed.)" RoutlegeFalmer 2006

44 Wooldridge, J. M., "Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data" The MIT Press 2002

45 함승환, "Do Parents Really Choose Schools Based on School Quality Criteria? Evidence from NHES Data" 한국교육행정학회 30 (30): 285-309, 2012

46 Schneider, M., "Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American school" Princeton University Press 2000

47 Waslander, S., "Choice, competition, and segregation: An empirical analysis of a New Zealand secondary school market, 1990-1993" 10 : 1-26, 1995

48 Finn, C., "Charter schools in action" Princeton University Press 2000

49 Hanushek, E., "Charter school quality and parental decision making with school choice" 91 : 823-848, 2007

50 Samdal, O., "Achieving health and educational goals through schools: A study of the importance of the school climate and the students' satisfaction with school" 13 (13): 383-397, 1998