환경오염피해구제를 위한 민사법제의 개선방안 및 대안모색 = A Study on a Method of Improving the Civil Legal System and a Proposal for the Relief of Environmental Pollution Damages

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

ⅰ) Just a thought of the phenol leakage accident of Doosan Electronic Corporation occurred in 1991, the hydrofluoric acid release accident occurred in Gumi in 2014, the accident of oil leakage in Yeosu in 2014, the explosion accident at a chemical factory reported recently, etc. gives us a good lesson that just one industrial facility can cause an enormous environmental pollution accident. Hence, now is the proper time to legislate an environmental responsibility act which recognize an strict liability as a method of improving the environmental pollution damage compensation in Korea. ⅱ) The civil law revised recently confirmed a meaningful revision concerning the use of the injunction about environmental pollution. It confirmed the revision of Article 217 of the Civil Law which makes clear the injunction and also confirmed a new stipulation for the request for the right to injunction, and if the request for the right to injunction is legislated, it seems that the basis stipulation for the right to injunction will be two. ⅲ) Concerning the request for damage compensation due to environmental pollution, judicial precedents of Korea take probability, but there are difficulties with the confirmation of offenders and the establishment of the relationship of cause and effect. Moreover, there is a limitation on the compensation to the victim if the offender is not able to compensate for damage and because there is no clear stipulation concerning the compensation for ecological damage. Therefore, an environmental responsibility act should be legislated which recognizes an strict liability concerning the compensation for environmental pollution damage. ⅳ) When the environmental responsibility act is enacted, the strict responsibility based on the facility responsibility, the written exemption stipulation about unavoidable events, the stipulation about the relief of establishment of causal relationships and the right to request for information, the responsibility insurance system for the performance of damage compensation, etc. should be adopted. However, regarding an unaccountable reason, the damage due to non-existence of reason, there should be a careful consideration in legislation for any compensation that should be made by the nation. ⅴ) When legislating the environmental responsibility law, there should not be an attempt to solve all problems at a time, but the matters that are sufficiently considered by referring to the environmental responsibility law of Germany, etc. should be included in the legislation and others should be included in the law after sufficient consideration later.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 전경운, "환경정책기본법 제31조에 의한 무과실책임의 문제점과 개정방향 - 환경정책기본법의 개정안 제44조와 관련하여-" 한국환경법학회 31 (31): 319-347, 2009

2 오석락, "환경소송의 제문제" 삼영사 1996

3 전경운, "환경사법론" 집문당 2009

4 구연창, "환경법론(개정판)" 법문사 1993

5 함태성, "환경법(제4판)" 博英社 2010

6 이은영, "채권각론(제5판)" 박영사 2005

7 곽윤직, "채권각론(신정수정판)" 박영사 2002

8 박창석, "징벌적 손해배상에 관한 비교법적 검토" 한국환경법학회 35 (35): 75-106, 2013

9 김병일, "인터넷 웹페이지에서의 광고의 삽입ㆍ차단 등을 둘러싼 법적 문제 -대상판결:대법원 2010.8.15.자2008마1541결정-" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 45-74, 2011

10 조은래, "이종상 박사 화갑기념논문집" 문양사 1994

11 전경운, "상린관계에 관한 민법개정논의" 한국토지법학회 28 (28): 171-204, 2012

12 김상중, "불법행위에 대한 금지청구권 규정의 신설 제안" 한국민사법학회 55 (55): 177-233, 2011

13 강태수, "분리이론에 의한 재산권체계 및 그 비판에 대한 고찰" 한국헌법학회 10 (10): 117-152, 2004

14 곽윤직, "민법주해(Ⅴ)" 박영사 1992

15 "민법안심의록(上卷)" 민의원 법제사법위원회 민법안심의소위원회 1957

16 곽윤직, "물권법(제7판)" 박영사 2002

17 이영준, "물권법(전정신판)" 박영사 2009

18 송덕수, "물권법" 박영사 2012

19 김상용, "물권법" 화산미디어 2009

20 김민중, "로스쿨 채권법(불법행위편) - 학설 및 코멘터리/판례100선" 청림출판 2007

21 진순석, "교육환경권침해와 유지청구" 10 : 1995

22 구연창, "晴軒金曾漢博士華甲紀念論文集(현대민법학의 제문제)" 1981

23 丁 海 相, "損害賠償의 法理와 懲罰的 損害賠償의 관계" 중앙법학회 6 (6): 241-253, 2004

24 Peter Marburger, "Zur Verteilung der Darlegungs- und Beweislast bei der Haftung für Umweltschäden" 351-, 1986

25 Peter Marburger, "Zur Reform des §906 BGB" Geburtstag 70 : 1997

26 Basler Komm, "ZGB Ⅱ, 3. Aufl" 2007

27 Hager Günter, "Umweltschäden -ein Prüfstein für die Wandlungs- und Leistungsfächigkeit des Deliktsrechts" 1986 : 1958

28 Peter Marburger, "Umwelthaftung im deutschen Recht" 한국환경법학회 29 (29): 3-16, 2007

29 Michael Kloepfer, "Umweltgesetzbuch -Allgemeiner Teil" 7 (7): 1991

30 Manfred Wolf, "Sachenrecht, 19. Aufl" 2003

31 Münchener Komm, "Medicus, 2. Aufl" 1004-, 1997

32 Karl Larenz, "Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts(Band Ⅰ), 14. Aufl" 1989

33 Staudingers Komm, "Herbert Roth, 13. Aufl" 906-, 1996

34 Michael Lemke, "Haftungsprobleme im Umweltbereich" 1-, 1989

35 Gaby Bornheim, "Haftung für grenzüberschreitende Umweltbeeinträchtigungen im Völkerrecht und im Internationalen Privatrecht" 1995

36 Eckhard Rehbinder, "Fortentwicklung des Umwelthaftungsrechts in der Bundesrepublick Deutschland" 146 : 1989

37 Rainald Enders, "Die Umwelthaftung im System des Umweltgesetzbuches" 1338-, 1991

38 Erich Gassner, "Der Ersatz des ökologischen Schadens nach dem geltenden Recht" 370-, 1987

39 Hein Kötz, "Deliktsrecht, 6. Aufl" 1994

40 Gert Landsberg, "Das neue Umwelthaftungsgesetz" 203-, 1991

41 민법개정총서, "2013년 법무부 민법개정시안(조문편)" 법무부 2013