ICC 국제중재법원과 대한상사중재원의 중재규칙 비교연구 = A Comparative Study on the Arbitration Rules between ICC International Court of Arbitration and Korean Commercial Arbitration Board

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Arbitration is a renowned alternative way of producing impartial resolutions to commercial disputes. Parties of arbitration select the place of arbitration, their own arbitration procedure based on their specific needs.
In Korea, there is the most leading arbitration orgnization the name of KCAB (Korean Commercial Arbitration Board). And the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce has been the world`s famous institution in private resolution of international commercial disputes.
The paper examines the most significant merits of ICC`s International Court of Arbitration provided in ICC Rules of Arbitration. They are "Terms of Reference" and "Scrutiny of the Award by the Court".
At first, The Terms of Reference are one of the most distinctive features of ICC Arbitration. The purpose of Terms of Reference is to examine their advantages and to introduce main contents provided in Article 18 of ICC Rules of Arbitration. The Terms of Reference provide the parties and the arbitrators with an opportunity to identify and agree on procedural and other matters, such as the applicable law, the language of the arbitration and the timetable for the arbitration.
And Scrutiny of award is also a fundamental feature of ICC arbitration and is one that distinguishes it from the other major international arbitration rules. The scrutiny system has two aspectsm the first of which is to identify or modify the defects of form, while the second is to draw the arbitrators` attention to points of substance.
To upgrade the quality of the award of KCAB, it is desirable to consider how to incorporate the scrutiny system of the ICC Arbitration into Korea Commercial Arbitration Rules, even though many consideration factors are existing now.
And The secretariat is responsible for appointing arbitrators, confirming arbitrators nominated by the parties, deciding upon challenges of arbitrators, reviewing drafts of arbitral awards and fixing the arbitrators` fee. During the arbitration proceedings, the secretariat regularly supervises the progress of all pending cases, and takes any needed measures to ensure that the case advances as quickly as possible and that the proceedings are being conducted in conformity with its arbitration rules.
Since disputes in international trade will generally concern complicated legal issues most likely involving more than one legal systems, the KCAB should make every attempt to recruit arbitrators who have been educated in arbitration system abroad as well as in Korea and at the same time are familiar with legal issues frequently arising in disputes in international trade. To that KCAB should do its utmost to recruit into its pool of arbitrators distinguished jurists from diverse backgrounds and legal cultures as varied as those of the participants in the arbitral process.
The Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB), the most leading arbitration orgnization in Korea, purposes to assist international parties who has to resolve commercial disputes as quickly, fairly and efficiently as possible.
This writer hopes that this study provides a useful help to KCAB rules of arbitration.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서론 1
• 제1절 연구의 배경과 목적 1
• 제2절 연구의 범위와 방법 3
• 제2장 중재제도 일반 5
• 제1절 중재의 제도적 배경과 이용현황 5
• 1. 제도적 배경 5
• 2. 이용현황 8
• 1) 대한상사중재원 8
• 2) ICC 10
• 3) ICSID 11
• 제2절 대한상사중재원 중재제도 개관 12
• 1. 중재규칙의 성립과 발달 12
• 2. 조직구성 15
• 3. 중재규칙의 특성 16
• 1) 조정제도와의 연계 16
• 2) 판정선례의 구축을 위한 판정사례집 발간 16
• 3) 당사자의 의사에 충실한 중재인의 선정 17
• 제3절 ICC 중재제도 개관 18
• 1. 중재규칙의 성립과 발달 18
• 2. 조직구성 19
• 3. 중재규칙의 특징 20
• 1) 당사자 자치성 21
• 2) 보편성 21
• 3) 중립성 21
• 제4절 중재의 한계성 22
• 1) 법적 전문성의 부족 23
• 2) 중재인선정의 문제 24
• 3) 중재판정의 예측 가능성 결여 25
• 제3장 주요사항별 비교 27
• 제1절 중재의 신청 및 개시 27
• 1. 대한상사중재원 27
• 2. ICC 30
• 3. 소결 31
• 제2절 중재인의 선정과 중재판정부의 구성 32
• 1. 대한상사중재원 33
• 2. ICC 35
• 3. 소결 37
• 제3절 중재절차 38
• 1. 대한상사중재원 39
• 2. ICC 41
• 3. 소결 43
• 제4절 중재판정 44
• 1. 대한상사중재원 44
• 2. ICC 46
• 3. 소결 48
• 제5절 중재비용 49
• 1. 대한상사중재원 50
• 2. ICC 53
• 3. 소결 55
• 제4장 대한상사중재원 중재제도의 문제점과 개선방안 57
• 제1절 서설 57
• 제2절 중재인의 자질검증 58
• 1. 대한상사중재원 중재인선정의 문제점 58
• 2. 대한상사중재원 중재인선정제도의 개선방안 60
• 제3절 위탁조건 (Terms of Reference) 제도의 도입 63
• 1. 대한상사중재원 중재절차 과정의 문제점 63
• 2. 대한상사중재원 중재절차 과정의 개선방안 64
• 제4절 판정문 초안 실사제도의 도입 66
• 1. 대한상사중재원 중재판정 과정의 문제점 66
• 2. 대한상사중재원 중재절차 과정의 개선방안 67
• 제5장 요약 및 결론 69
• 참고문헌 72
• ABSTRACT 78