21C WTO체제 하에서의 FTA와 과학기술정책의 상관관계에 관한 소고 = A Look Over on the Correlation between FTA and Science & Technology Policy in WTO for 21C

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

I think that science & technology is not unrelated with FTA. Because it pulls economic strength step as a result country`s science & technology shows big difference speed and result according to connection policy of these country. Because FTA is agreement that lower tariff or service wall between country or between fixed area, conclusion of the agreement is case that get into profit in the own country in fixed transaction, but there is the opposite case. From now on, we must discuss if is going to elaborate and supplement FTA policy and scientific technique policy how forward we advantage by the agreement than calculation of profit that FTA agreement gives to us. If the speed that FTA increases is fast, liberalization that international trade is perfect between the two countries by WTO`s surveillance and control forward may come true. This may apply WTO normally and do WTO and control of scientific technique policy between the FTA country and lively interchange and prosper technic finally. Scientific technique policy that the most country propels is enforced for two directions greatly. One enforces when develop fixed technology the country achieves some purpose of national defense or energy development etc., and another is thing to procure technic gradually and improve scientific technique competitive power. Because scientific technique policy that correspond to the latter here is thing to secure universality of technic, pointed end scientific technique flows as water flows to opponent through international trade. Therefore, each country is going to keep forefront in international market through scientific technique policy and protectionism of Intellectual Property rights. Recently, that FTA conclusion number is increasing worldwide this some measure reflect. The United States of America contracted FTA by Israel, the Canada and NAFTA`s order from the early 1980s to early 1990s, and South Africa area and FTA mainly in the 2000s. This countries are the country or area that preserve affinity by exchange relation as well as diplomacy and national defense exteriorly with the United States of America so far. The United States of America expresses will to preserve continuously affinity about diplomacy and national defense including this countries and international trade. While, the most country gains economical profit through international trade and think that purpose at the same time to prosper technic is biggest. Because most of these country is low remarkably competitive power of economy and technic than the United States of America. In the meantime, American scientific technique policy is emphasizing on practical side that expand share because do to reform technic. Therefore, logic that it expands market and is resource that develop state economy that American scientific technique policy does to reform technic is spread to foundation, its U.S. Government and corporation convinced FTA`s necessity and can speak that FTA is doing enough the function as fruit of technic in the United States of America at least finally. Japan is fermenting already or negotiate now contracting the southeast Asia countries and FTA mainly since 2001. Most of the southeast Asia country are thing which guarantor focuses in point to continue economic growth forward. Because cooperation system is constructed between junta and common people inquiry organization which government leading type scientific technique policy of Japan decides policy, direction of policy is been consistent. China is propeling countries and FTA that technic and economy do not develop yet such as South Africa`s part country, Middle East and Australia and New Zealand, Ireland including the southeast Asia country such as ASEAN from early 2002s. China considers all politics, diplomacy national security and economical side and consider national anthem that get into profit in own country by partner. By the way, though the South Korea selects FTA conclusion target soup, it no seem to be clear standard. Perhaps, know less than whether is selecting the most topical called economy development through international trade and plain standard. Specially, if examine the United States of America that is FTA`s partner being doing international trade with the South Korea, Japan, 4 country relation with China, the all 4 countries are Chile and Singapore and Australia in case select the same country by partner of FTA of the own country. For front, is FTA`s partner with these 3 country which is Korean main international transaction target nation, but think that there are much problems if consider case that these 3 departments and the many countries in FTA relation are no FTA relation with us. Because interchange of competitive power is activated about field that competitive power is high than us finally if daytime there will be much cases but FTA is contracted between two countries in several fields than FTA`s partner now, our competitive power is defined and competitive power daytime field that decrease be. This may not be different in scientific technique field. Therefore, I think that there is necessity to set FTA Guideline and backing Korean scientific technique policy.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박종근, "중국환경보호의 법률연구" 과학기술법연구원 9 (9): 151-183, 2003

2 김갑수, "일본의 과학기술체제와 정책(STEPI 보고서)" STEPI 1994

3 김 민, "일본과학기술의 현재와 미래" 범양사 (여름) : 1995

4 이상수, "우리나라 과학기술법체계의 문제점" 한남대학교 과학기술법연구원 3 : 1997

5 김선경, "세계경제포럼(WEP)의 세계경쟁력보고서 2007-2008분석" 한국과학기술평가원 2008

6 조만형, "미국 과학기술체제의 변천과 구조" 범양사 (겨울) : 1992

7 이경희, "과학기술법제정사" 세창출판사 2004

8 김관식, "과학기술 관련 분야에서의 한ㆍ미 FTA의 이해와 분석" 과학기술법연구원 13 (13): 129-161, 2007

9 한국은행, "경제통계자료시스템"

10 尾池厚之, "韓米FTA合意と日本及び東アジア経済統合への影響" 55 (55): 2007

11 中島朋義, "韓国のFTA政策ーその概括と経済効果分析ー" 2007

12 經濟産業省, "通商白書2007" 時事畵報社 2007

13 山根裕子, "途上国と米国FTAの知財条項ー特許保護期間の延長制度と販売承認データ保護規定など" 日本關稅協會 55 (55): 2007

14 阿部顕三, "経済教室 WTOㆍFTAすみ分けを" 日本経済新聞社 2006

15 佐々木高成, "米国労働組合等の通商政策批判と影響" 國際貿易と投資硏究所 (69) : 2007

16 馬成三, "現代中國の對外經濟關係" 明石書店 2007

17 石田信隆, "東アジア農業とFTA" (21) : 2005

18 山下英次, "東アジア共同体の課題·１.FTAの次に何を目指すか?" 56 (56): 2008

19 浦田秀次郞, "日本のFTA前略" 財務總合政策硏究所 (81) : 2006

20 尾池厚之, "日本のEPA交渉の展開と展望" 54 (54): 2006

21 日本經濟連携促進關係閣僚會議, "今後の經濟連携協定の推進についての基本方針"

22 日本機械輸出組合編輯部, "主要な自由貿易協定の現狀と法的 分析" 日本機械輸出組合 2000

23 朱炎, "中國の自由貿易協定へのアプローチとその影響" 7 (7): 2003

24 朱炎, "中國のFTA戰略とアジア各國への影響" (459) : 2003

25 真家陽一, "中国の経済分析ーFTAの積極活用で外資導入国から海外進出国へ変貌する中国" 85 (85): 2007

26 大西康雄, "中国のFTA戰略と海外直接投資ーASEANを中心にー東アジアFTAと日中貿易" アジア經濟硏究所 2007

27 田村次郎, "WTOガイドブック" 弘文堂 2007

28 森田淸隆, "WTOの多角的通商體制と地域貿易協定との關係に關する一考察" 國際商事法務硏究所 33 (33): 2005

29 WTO, "Regional Trade Agreement Facts and Figures"

30 Paul Krugman, "Pop Internationalism" Cambridge, MIT Press 1996

31 産經新聞, "NAFTA攻防 米․カナダメキシコ自由貿易强調"

32 United States General Accounting Office, "International Trade:Intensifying Free Trade Negotiating Agenda Calls for Better Allocation of Staff and Resources"

33 Robert B. Zoellick, "Globalization, Trade and Economic Security"

34 The World Economic Forum, "Global Competitiveness Report 2007-2008" 2008

35 노명준, "GATT/WTO체제상 환경보호와 무역규제" 한남대학교 과학기술법연구원 (창간) : 1995

36 김경미, "FTA와 국내정치-한일FTA정책의 비교-" 국제관계학회 (26) : 2007

37 鈴木宣弘, "FTA評価の視点, FTAと食料" 筑波書房 2005

38 浦田秀次郞, "FTAガイドブック2007" ジェトロ 2007

39 Anne O. Krueger, "American Trade Policy: A Tragedy in the Making" American Enterprise Institute Press 1995

40 松本邦愛, "ASEANㆍ中國のFTAの政治経済学-中國ㆍASEANのFTAと東アジア経済" 文眞堂 2007

41 인테넷과학신문, "2009.1.12(월)자 기사"

42 The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, "2006 Diplomatic White Paper" The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade 2006