RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      진료수행시험에서 동일한 사례를 연기한 다수의 표준화 환자 간 채점결과 신뢰도 = Inter-rater Reliability in a Clinical Performance Examination Using Multiple Standardized Patientsfor the Same Case

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103845688

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: The “standardization” of standardized patients (SP) is one of the most crucial factors for a successful clinical performance examination (CPX). This study aimed to examine the inter-rater reliability among SPs who portrayed the same case ...

      Purpose: The “standardization” of standardized patients (SP) is one of the most crucial factors
      for a successful clinical performance examination (CPX). This study aimed to examine the
      inter-rater reliability among SPs who portrayed the same case during a CPX.
      Methods: The context was a CPX conducted under the supervision of CPX Seoul-Gyeonggi
      Consortium in K medical school in August 2007. K medical school ran 12 stations consisting
      of duplicated sets of 6 cases. In total, thirty SPs participated with 5 SPs acting each of the 6
      cases. The SPs evaluated the student’s performances in addition to portraying the cases.
      ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) was used to compare scores rated by the different SPs. The
      dependent variables were the case scores and the 4 subcomponent (history taking, physical
      examination, Clinical courtesy, and Patient-physician interaction) scores for each case; the
      independent variable was the SPs; and the covariate was the CPX total score.
      Results: The Headache and Cough stations showed an acceptable level of reliability.
      Otherwise, Weight Loss and Facial Flushing failed to show consistent scores in all 4
      subcomponents. Diarrhea and Lt. hemiparesis showed partial consistency. In terms of the
      subcomponents, the physical exam scores were most consistent and the patient-physician
      interaction scores were most inconsistent.
      Conclusion: This study tested the level of “standardization” of one set of CPX cases with
      mixed results. The authors hope that our results will contribute to quality assurance of CPX.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Martin, J.A., "Who should rate candidates in an objective structured clinical examination?" 71 (71): 170-175, 1996

      2 Nieman, L.Z., "Training and validating the use of geriatric simulated patients" 27 : 154-159, 1988

      3 Mazor, K.M., "The relationship between checklist scores on a communication OSCE and analogue patients’ perceptions of communication" 10 (10): 37-51, 2005

      4 Wang, W., "The effect of fatigue on the accuracy of standardised patients' checklist recording" 8 : 148-151, 1996

      5 Kim, S., "The appropriateness of using standardized patients (SPs) assessment scores in clinical performance examination (CPX)" 17 (17): 163-172, 2005

      6 de Champlain, A.F., "Standardised patients' accuracy in recording examinees' behaviours using checklists" 72 (72): S85-S87, 1997

      7 Ahn, D., "Standard setting in student assessment by criterion referenced evaluation" 13 (13): 41-45, 2001

      8 Tamblyn, R., "Sources of unreliability and bias in standardised patient rating" 3 : 74-85, 1991

      9 Solomon, D.J., "Source of measurement error in an ECG examination:implications for performance-based assessments" 9 (9): 283-290, 2004

      10 Park, H., "Sharing of information among students and its effect on the scores of clinical performance examination" 17 (17): 185-195, 2005

      1 Martin, J.A., "Who should rate candidates in an objective structured clinical examination?" 71 (71): 170-175, 1996

      2 Nieman, L.Z., "Training and validating the use of geriatric simulated patients" 27 : 154-159, 1988

      3 Mazor, K.M., "The relationship between checklist scores on a communication OSCE and analogue patients’ perceptions of communication" 10 (10): 37-51, 2005

      4 Wang, W., "The effect of fatigue on the accuracy of standardised patients' checklist recording" 8 : 148-151, 1996

      5 Kim, S., "The appropriateness of using standardized patients (SPs) assessment scores in clinical performance examination (CPX)" 17 (17): 163-172, 2005

      6 de Champlain, A.F., "Standardised patients' accuracy in recording examinees' behaviours using checklists" 72 (72): S85-S87, 1997

      7 Ahn, D., "Standard setting in student assessment by criterion referenced evaluation" 13 (13): 41-45, 2001

      8 Tamblyn, R., "Sources of unreliability and bias in standardised patient rating" 3 : 74-85, 1991

      9 Solomon, D.J., "Source of measurement error in an ECG examination:implications for performance-based assessments" 9 (9): 283-290, 2004

      10 Park, H., "Sharing of information among students and its effect on the scores of clinical performance examination" 17 (17): 185-195, 2005

      11 Downing, S., "Reliability: on the reproducibility if assessment data" 38 : 1006-1012, 2004

      12 Boulet, J.R., "Quality assurance methods for performance-based assessments" 8 (8): 27-47, 2003

      13 Pangaro, L.N., "Performance of “standardized examinees” in a standardizedpatient examination of clinical skills" 72 (72): 1008-1011, 1997

      14 Brennan, R., "Performance assessments from the perspective of generalizability theory" 24 (24): 339-353, 2000

      15 Sung, T.(, "Nonsulhyung gosawa yecheneuinggye silgigosareul wihan chejumjagan silroedo chujeong" 7 (7): 43-56, 1994

      16 Auewarakul, C., "Item analysis to improve reliability for an internal medicine undergraduate OSCE" 10 (10): 105-113, 2005

      17 Solomon, D.J., "Global rating of student performance in a standardized patient examination: is the whole more than the sum of the parts?" 5 (5): 131-140, 2000

      18 Crossley, J., "Generalisability: a key to unlock professional assessment" 36 (36): 972-978, 2002

      19 Chesser, A.M., "Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment" 38 (38): 825-831, 2004

      20 Park, W., "Correlation of CPX scores with the scores of the clinical clerkship assessments and written examinations" 17 (17): 297-303, 2005

      21 Kwon, I., "Comparison of the evaluation results of faculty with those of standardized patients in a clinical performance examination experience" 17 (17): 173-183, 2005

      22 Kim, K., "Comparison of interrater consistence and accuracy of estimation for ability parameters among multiple scoring scales" 14 (14): 327-347, 2001

      23 "CPX Seoul-Gyeonggi Consortium"

      24 Kim, J., "Analysis of the evaluation for clinical performance examination using standardized patients in one medical school" 16 (16): 51-61, 2004

      25 Heine, N., "An analysis of standardized patient checklist errors and their effect on student scores" 37 : 99-104, 2003

      26 Im, H., "A study of investigating error sources and reliability for clinical performance examination (CPX)." 18 (18): 27-46, 2005

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-07-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국의학교육 -> Korean Journal of Medical Education
      외국어명 : korean journal of medical education -> 미등록
      KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.02 1.02 0.76
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.82 0.76 1.204 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼