예비 생물교사들의 생명윤리 논쟁거리에 대한 논증 활동의 효과 = The Effects of Preservice Biology Teachers` Argumentation on Bioethical Issues

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of preservice teachers`` argumentation on bioethical issues. The preservice teachers were given four bioethical issues of euthanasia, stem cell, GMO and global warming. They participated in the group discussion identifying claim, ground, warrant, backing, and rebuttal, and then wrote about each topic using Toulmin``s argumentation structure. The results indicated that the preservice teachers improved the problem solving ability, the critical thinking ability, and the understanding of nature of science after the intervention. The preservice teachers also recognized the importance of evidence, rebuttal, critical thinking, scientific knowledge related to bioethical issues. Furthermore, they mentioned that they have insights of how to teach secondary students when dealing with bioethical issues in their reflective journal.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이우숙, "성인의 문제해결과정 측정도구 개발" 기본간호학회 15 (15): 548-557, 2008

2 조희형, "생명윤리 교수-학습 모형과 교수-학습에 적절한 생명윤리 논쟁거리 탐색" 한국생물교육학회 37 (37): 199-212, 2009

3 한혜진, "과학영재의 논증 활동에서 나타나는 반박 유형 분석" 한국과학교육학회 32 (32): 717-728, 2012

4 이현주, "과학과 관련된 사회적·윤리적 문제에 대한 예비 과학교사들의 의사결정유형" 교과교육연구소 12 (12): 377-396, 2008

5 장지영, "과학과 관련된 사회∙윤리적 문제(SSI)의 맥락에 따른 중학생들의 인성적 태도와 가치관 분석" 한국과학교육학회 32 (32): 1124-1138, 2012

6 Toulmin, S. E., "The Uses of Argument" Cambridge University Press 1958

7 Sadler, T. D., "Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue" 26 (26): 387-409, 2004

8 Sadler, T. D., "Socioscientific argumentation : The effects of content knowledge and morality" 28 (28): 1463-1488, 2006

9 DeBoer, G. E., "Scientific literacy : Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform" 37 (37): 582-601, 2000

10 Miles, M. B., "Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook" Sage Publications 1994

11 Sadler, T. D., "Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making" 42 (42): 112-138, 2005

12 Flower, S. R., "Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students" 31 (31): 279-296, 2009

13 Sadler, T. D., "Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues : A critical review of research" 41 (41): 513-536, 2004

14 Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms" 84 (84): 287-312, 2000

15 Osborne, J., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science" 41 (41): 994-1020, 2004

16 Yoon, J., "Development of an instrument for the measurement of critical thinking disposition: In nursing" The Catholic University of Korea 2004

17 Tsai, C., "Developing a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemological views toward science" 27 (27): 1621-1638, 2005

18 Facione, P. A., "Critical Thinking : What it is and why it counts" California Academic Press 1991

19 Liu, S. Y., "College students'scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making" 95 : 497-517, 2011

20 MOEST(Ministry of Education, Science and Technology), "2009 Revised Science Curriculum" Ministry of Education, Science and Technology 2011