RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      요추추간판탈출증에 대한 현미경적 수술과 고식적 수술의 비교분석 = Clinical analysis of microsurgical and standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45000939

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study was performed in an attempt to compare clinical results after microscopic and standard discectomy of lumbar disc herniation. From Jan. 1994 to Feb. 2002, 15I cases of lumbar disc herniation was operated by either method. Average age was 42....

      This study was performed in an attempt to compare clinical results after microscopic and standard discectomy of lumbar disc herniation. From Jan. 1994 to Feb. 2002, 15I cases of lumbar disc herniation was operated by either method. Average age was 42.1years. There were 104cases in microscopic discetomy group and 47cases in standard discectomy group. Mean follow-up duration were 7yrs and 6ms. Clinical results by the criteria of Macnab and back pain functional scale, the change of lower back pain score and recovery rate were compared between microscopic and standard discectomy group retrospectively. Statistical analysis was made using paired two-tailed t-test. By criteria of Macnab and back pain fuctional improvement score. there was no significant difference between standard and microscopic surgery group(p>0.05) at 6 years follow-up. Mean operation time in microscopic surgery group was 54mins whereas in standard surgery group was 72mins. Ambulation was begun postoperative 3.7days in microscopic surgery group, 6.1days in standard surgery group. As for the hospital stay, 6.6days in microscopic group and 11.2days in standard surgery group. Microsopic discectomy is an effective method because it has same results in clinical aspect and has much advantages such as short operation time, short hospitalization, minimal incision.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼