Natural Aristocracy, Instrumentalism, Equality and Excellence

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Tongdong Bai’s Against Political Equality presents an interpretation of Confucian political morality, a critique of political equality and an argument in support of a form of meritocratic instrumentalism for politics. This paper sympathetically engages with Bai’s discussion. It grants, but does not itself defend, his rejection of political equality. It distinguishes basic moral equality from the ideal of social equality, suggesting that Bai’s view is compatible with the former, but not with the latter. It then distinguishes two understandings of political meritocracy: meritocratic instrumentalism and natural aristocracy. It clarifies natural aristocracy and presents a case for accepting it over meritocratic instrumentalism. Unlike the proponent of meritocratic instrumentalism, the proponent of natural aristocracy holds that those who are most fit to rule have a claim to rule over and above the instrumental advantages that their rule would secure. And, unlike the proponent of meritocratic instrumentalism, the proponent of natural aristocracy contends that relational values in politics have a role to play in the justification of political decision-making arrangements. Key to the discussion throughout is the challenge that the ideal of social equality poses to any defense of political meritocracy. The paper contends that natural aristocracy is better positioned to respond to this challenge than meritocratic instrumentalism. The paper concludes by relating natural aristocracy to the liberal idea of a social union of social unions and to Michael Walzer’s ideal of complex equality.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Anderson, Elizabeth, "What Is the Point of Equality" 109 (109): 287-337, 1999

2 Scheffler, Samuel, "What Is Egalitarianism?" 31 (31): 17-18, 2002

3 Arneson, Richard, "Vol. 2 of Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy" Oxford University Press 156-184, 2016

4 Plato, "The Republic, Book VI" Hackett Publishing 1974

5 Aristotle, "The Politics, Book III, edited by Stephen Everson" Cambridge University Press 1988

6 Sidgwick, Henry, "The Methods of Ethics" Hackett Publishing 1981

7 Arneson, Richard, "The Idea of Democracy, edited by Jean Hampton, David Copp, and John Roemer" Cambridge University Press 1993

8 Page, Scott, "The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools and Societies" Princeton University Press 2007

9 Mill, John Stuart, "The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill" University of Toronto Press 1861

10 Walzer, Michael, "Spheres of Justice" Basic Books 1983

11 Dworkin, Ronald, "Sovereign Virtue" Harvard University Press 2000

12 Miller, David, "Social Equality" Oxford University Press 7-9, 2015

13 Hurka, Thomas, "Indirect Perfectionism: Kymlicka on Liberal Neutrality" 3 (3): 36-57, 1995

14 Feinberg, Joel, "Doing and Deserving" Princeton University Press 1970

15 Landemore, Helene, "Democratic Reason" Princeton University Press 2020

16 Wall, Steven, "Democracy and Equality" 57 (57): 416-438, 2007

17 McKerlie, Dennis, "Aristotle’s Theory of Justice" 39 : 119-141, 2001

18 Mulgan, Richard, "Aristotle’s Political Theory" Oxford University Press 1987

19 Nozick, Robert, "Anarchy, State and Utopia" Basic Books 1974

20 Bai, Tongdong, "Against Political Equality" Princeton 2020

21 Rawls, John, "A Theory of Justice" Cambridge 1971