RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한 손 들기 작업과 양 손 들기 작업의 근력 능력 비교 연구 = Comparison of Muscle Strength for One-hand and Two-hands Lifting Activity

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105211016

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a major problem in industries in which manual materials handling is performed by workers. To prevent these WMSDs, it is necessary to understand the muscular strength capability and use this knowledge ...

      Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a major problem in industries in which manual materials handling is performed by workers. To prevent these WMSDs, it is necessary to understand the muscular strength capability and use this knowledge to design job and selection and assignment of workers. Even though two-hands lifting activity of manual materials handling tasks are prevalent at the industrial site, many manual materials handling tasks which require the worker to perform one-hand lifting are also very common at the industrial site and forestry and farming. However, a few researches have been done for one-hand lifting activity of manual materials handling tasks. The objective of this study is to compare one-hand and two-hands lifting strength in terms of static and dynamic strength of the lifting activity for the ranging from the height of knuckle to elbow. It is shown in this study that the isometric lifting strength of one-hand is ranging from 54.7 to 63.3% of the one of two-hands. However, it is found that there is no significant difference between a person's isometric lifting strength for left-hand and right-hand. It is also shown that there is no significant difference between the peak force under the dynamic sub-maximal loading with one-hand and two-hands lifting activity. Similar results were obtained for the peak acceleration and peak velocity under the dynamic sub-maximal loading with one-hand and two-hands lifting activity. Isometric lifting strength at the height of knuckle was ranging from 2 to 3 times of the dynamic peak force during sub-maximal lifting. It is concluded that the dynamic peak forces under the sub-maximal loading are not highly correlated with the isometric lifting strength in similar postures.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Allread, "Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting and the effects of asymmetry and load weight" 39 (39): 322-334, 1996

      2 Thompson, "The relationship of isometric strength to peak dynamic hand forces during submaximal weight lifting International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics" 15-23, 1992

      3 Snook, "The design of manual handling tasks revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces" ergo (ergo): 1197-1213, 1991

      4 Snook, "The Design of Manual Handling Tasks" ergo (ergo): 963-985, 1978

      5 Mital, "Subjective estimates of one-handed carrying tasks" applied ergo (applied ergo): 265-269, 1983

      6 Marras, "Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands" 41 (41): 817-834, 1998

      7 Mital, "Relationship between Lifting Capacity and Injuries in Occupations Requiring Lifting Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 22nd Annual Meeting" 1978

      8 Snook, "Psychophysical Studies of Physiological Fatigue Criteria" 291-299, 1969

      9 Ayoub, "Psychophysical Based Models for the Prediction of Lifting Capacity of the Industrial Worker Paper presented at the Automotive Engineering Congress and Exposition" 1976a

      10 Ayoub, "Pro- ceedings of the 5th Congress on Ergonomics" 1973

      1 Allread, "Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting and the effects of asymmetry and load weight" 39 (39): 322-334, 1996

      2 Thompson, "The relationship of isometric strength to peak dynamic hand forces during submaximal weight lifting International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics" 15-23, 1992

      3 Snook, "The design of manual handling tasks revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces" ergo (ergo): 1197-1213, 1991

      4 Snook, "The Design of Manual Handling Tasks" ergo (ergo): 963-985, 1978

      5 Mital, "Subjective estimates of one-handed carrying tasks" applied ergo (applied ergo): 265-269, 1983

      6 Marras, "Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands" 41 (41): 817-834, 1998

      7 Mital, "Relationship between Lifting Capacity and Injuries in Occupations Requiring Lifting Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 22nd Annual Meeting" 1978

      8 Snook, "Psychophysical Studies of Physiological Fatigue Criteria" 291-299, 1969

      9 Ayoub, "Psychophysical Based Models for the Prediction of Lifting Capacity of the Industrial Worker Paper presented at the Automotive Engineering Congress and Exposition" 1976a

      10 Ayoub, "Pro- ceedings of the 5th Congress on Ergonomics" 1973

      11 Lubbock, "Predictive Models for the Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift" Texas Tech University 1974

      12 Poulsen, "Prediction of Maximum Loads in Lifting from Measurement of Back Muscle Strength" 146-149, 1970

      13 McDaniel, "Prediction of Acceptable Lift Capability" Texas Tech University 1972

      14 Garg, "Physiological response to one-handed in the horizontal plane by female workers" 190-2001983

      15 "National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Work Practices Guide for Manual Lifting Department of Health and Human Services Publication No" 81-122, 1981

      16 Ayoub, "Modeling of Lifting Capacity as a Function of Operator and Task Variables Paper presented at the International Symposium Safety in Manual Materials Handling" 197619-211976b

      17 Ayoub, "Modeling in Lifting Activities Paper presented at the American Industrial Hygiene Association Meeting" 1973

      18 Garg, "Maximum frequency acceptable to female workers for one-handed lifts in the horizontal plane" ergo (ergo): 839-853, 1982

      19 Snook, "Maximum Weights and Work Loads Acceptable to Female Workers Journal of Occupational Medicine" 527-534, 1974

      20 Snook, "Maximum Frequency of Lift Acceptable to Male Industrial Workers" 531-536, 1968

      21 "LIDO Lift User's Guide" Loredan Biomedical, Inc. 1995

      22 Mital, "Human muscle strength definitions, measurement, and usage: Part II - The scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide" 22 : 123-144, 1998b

      23 Mital, "Human muscle strength definitions, measurement, and usage: Part I - Guidelines for the practitioner" 22 : 101-121, 1998a

      24 Chaffin, "Ergonomics Guide for The Assessment of Human Static Strength" 505-511, 1975

      25 Pytel, "Dynamica Strength Test as A Predictor for Maximal and Acceptable Lifting" ergo (ergo): 663-672, 1981

      26 Ayoub, "Dynamic Biomechanical Model for Sagittal Lifting Activities Proceedings of the 6th Congress of International Ergonomics Association" 355-359, 1976

      27 Ayoub, "Determination and modeling of lifting capacity" 5r010h& (5r010h&): 00545-02, 1978

      28 Gall, "Changes in physical capacity as a function of age in heavy manual work" 47 (47): 671-687, 2004

      29 "Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S.A." 2005

      30 Kromer, "An Isoinertial Technique to Assess Individual Lifting Capacity" 493-506, 1983

      31 Caldwell, "A Proposed Standard Procedure for Static Muscle Strength Testing" 201-206, 1974

      32 Dryden, "A Predictive Model for the Maximum Permissible Weight of Lift from Knuckle to Shoulder Height" Texas Tech University 1973

      33 Chaffin, "A Method for Evaluating the Biomechanical Stresses Resulting from Manual Materials Handling Jobs" 662-675, 1977

      34 and Ayoub, "A Comparison of Dynamic- and Static¬ strength Models for Prediction of Lifting Capacity" ergo (ergo): 1409-1417, 1985

      35 Garg, "A Biomechanical Computerized Simulation of Human Strength" 1-15, 1975

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.15 0.19 0.306 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼