RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기업의 생산성과 계측관련에 대한 고찰 - 일본 사례를 중심으로 - = A Study on the Productivity and Measurement of Enterprises

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106227902

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Achieved through input expansion rather than productivity increase. Therefore, he argues that the economy of East Asia is not a sustainable growth system.
      Production improvements generally refer to labor productivity. However, as there are units to labor productivity, it is clear and easy to understand but it only uses the input elements of labor and capital so there may be limitations to productivity measurements in a complex industrial society like the one we have today. Because of this, interest in TFP concepts is increasing.
      According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and surveys of The Conference Board, the productivity increase rates of major countries have been rapidly decreasing since the early 2000s. The productivity of America, which had increased an annual average of 2.5% during the years of 1995 to 2005 showed an increase rate of less than a mere 1.0% for 10 years since 2005 and the productivity increase rate of Germany also fell from 1.7% to 0.7%. The productivity increase rate of Japan also decreased greatly from 1.8% to 0.8%. Theoretically, for a country’s economy to grow, resources such as labor and capital must be input more or productivity must be increased.
      However, great results are not being seen even when resources of employment are being input.
      Conclusively, if productivity cannot be increased even if many people work, then economic growth cannot be achieved as expected. While productivity is not everything, it does have an important role in economic growth or wage increases in the long-term.
      In the case of Japan, according to The Conference Board, the labor productivity per hour in 2016 was 44.9 dollars, making it 23rd among 63 countries so it has not shown improvement in the past 20 years.
      Japan has had high levels of factory productivity for the past twenty years but its overall productivity appears to be horrible. In particular, their overall national productivity is at a low level when the service field is included. High levels of productivity are even more important for the economic growth and living standard improvements of Japan, in which the population is decreasing. As the growth momentum of Japan’s economy is weakening due to a decrease in the productive population following low birth rates and aging, labor productivity improvements are the goal of their national economic policies for the resolution of this problem.
      번역하기

      Achieved through input expansion rather than productivity increase. Therefore, he argues that the economy of East Asia is not a sustainable growth system. Production improvements generally refer to labor productivity. However, as there are units to la...

      Achieved through input expansion rather than productivity increase. Therefore, he argues that the economy of East Asia is not a sustainable growth system.
      Production improvements generally refer to labor productivity. However, as there are units to labor productivity, it is clear and easy to understand but it only uses the input elements of labor and capital so there may be limitations to productivity measurements in a complex industrial society like the one we have today. Because of this, interest in TFP concepts is increasing.
      According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and surveys of The Conference Board, the productivity increase rates of major countries have been rapidly decreasing since the early 2000s. The productivity of America, which had increased an annual average of 2.5% during the years of 1995 to 2005 showed an increase rate of less than a mere 1.0% for 10 years since 2005 and the productivity increase rate of Germany also fell from 1.7% to 0.7%. The productivity increase rate of Japan also decreased greatly from 1.8% to 0.8%. Theoretically, for a country’s economy to grow, resources such as labor and capital must be input more or productivity must be increased.
      However, great results are not being seen even when resources of employment are being input.
      Conclusively, if productivity cannot be increased even if many people work, then economic growth cannot be achieved as expected. While productivity is not everything, it does have an important role in economic growth or wage increases in the long-term.
      In the case of Japan, according to The Conference Board, the labor productivity per hour in 2016 was 44.9 dollars, making it 23rd among 63 countries so it has not shown improvement in the past 20 years.
      Japan has had high levels of factory productivity for the past twenty years but its overall productivity appears to be horrible. In particular, their overall national productivity is at a low level when the service field is included. High levels of productivity are even more important for the economic growth and living standard improvements of Japan, in which the population is decreasing. As the growth momentum of Japan’s economy is weakening due to a decrease in the productive population following low birth rates and aging, labor productivity improvements are the goal of their national economic policies for the resolution of this problem.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 藤原裕行, "税務データを用いた分配側GDPの計算" 日本銀行 123-126, 2016

      2 藤原裕行, "税務データを用いた分配側GDPの計算" 日本銀行 121-124, 2016

      3 滝澤美帆, "日米産業別労働生産水準比較" 日本生産性本部 234-240, 2016

      4 黑田昌裕, "日本経済の一般均衡分析" 筑摩書房 23-31, 1974

      5 岩田規久男, "失われた10年の真因は何か" 東洋経済新報社 45-50, 2003

      6 深尾京司, "サ-ビス事業生産性-決定要因と向上対策(2016-2020年度, 一橋大学)" 一橋大學経済研究所 67-,

      1 藤原裕行, "税務データを用いた分配側GDPの計算" 日本銀行 123-126, 2016

      2 藤原裕行, "税務データを用いた分配側GDPの計算" 日本銀行 121-124, 2016

      3 滝澤美帆, "日米産業別労働生産水準比較" 日本生産性本部 234-240, 2016

      4 黑田昌裕, "日本経済の一般均衡分析" 筑摩書房 23-31, 1974

      5 岩田規久男, "失われた10年の真因は何か" 東洋経済新報社 45-50, 2003

      6 深尾京司, "サ-ビス事業生産性-決定要因と向上対策(2016-2020年度, 一橋大学)" 一橋大學経済研究所 67-,

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.35 0.35 0.29
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.27 0.24 0.556 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼