RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Effects of Using Socrative on Speaking and Listening Performance of EFL University Students

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106229239

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The aim of the study is to investigate the impact of a learner response system (LRS), Socrative, in promoting learners’ performance when implemented for communicative activities. The main reason of using Socrative was to increase students’ engagem...

      The aim of the study is to investigate the impact of a learner response system (LRS), Socrative, in promoting learners’ performance when implemented for communicative activities. The main reason of using Socrative was to increase students’ engagement and interaction with others in order to fully comprehend the content of the learning material. The participants of the study were 44 university students who were divided into two different groups. A control group used a traditional method, and an experimental group used Socrative for interacting with one another in class activities. Both groups took the TOEIC test as a pre-test for speaking and listening. They went through the same procedures with the exception of an experimental group using a mobile application. Thereafter, the same test was given as a post-test. Significant differences in learning gains were found within each group. Moreover, there were statistical differences between the two groups in terms of speaking, but not in listening performance. Surveys were conducted in order to reveal the participants’ attitudes towards English language learning. By employing factor analysis, detailed results of surveys demonstrated various perceptions of the participants’ use of Socrative. Pedagogical implications are proposed based on the findings of this study.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Gok, T., "Using classroom response system to enhance students’ learning and classroom interactivity" 45 : 49-68, 2011

      2 차윤정, "Using a Student Response System (Socrative) as a Pre-Reading Method in an EFL Reading Environment" 영상영어교육학회 19 (19): 95-119, 2018

      3 Dakka, S. M., "Using Socrative to enhance in-class student engagement and collaboration" 4 (4): 13-19, 2015

      4 Awedh, M., "Using Socrative and smartphones for the support of collaborative learning" 3 (3): 17-24, 2014

      5 윤서영, "Using Learner Response Systems in EFL Classrooms: Students’ Perspectives and Experience" 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회 20 (20): 36-58, 2017

      6 Wang, A. I., "The wear out effect of a game-based student response system" 82 : 217-227, 2015

      7 Shaban, A. E., "The use of Socrative in ESL classrooms : Towards active learning" 17 (17): 64-77, 2017

      8 Hung, H. T., "The integration of a student response system in flipped classrooms" 21 (21): 16-27, 2017

      9 McDonough, K., "The impact of individual and shared clicker use on students’ collaborative learning" 86 : 236-249, 2015

      10 Kessler, G., "The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning" Wiley-Blackwell 278-292, 2017

      1 Gok, T., "Using classroom response system to enhance students’ learning and classroom interactivity" 45 : 49-68, 2011

      2 차윤정, "Using a Student Response System (Socrative) as a Pre-Reading Method in an EFL Reading Environment" 영상영어교육학회 19 (19): 95-119, 2018

      3 Dakka, S. M., "Using Socrative to enhance in-class student engagement and collaboration" 4 (4): 13-19, 2015

      4 Awedh, M., "Using Socrative and smartphones for the support of collaborative learning" 3 (3): 17-24, 2014

      5 윤서영, "Using Learner Response Systems in EFL Classrooms: Students’ Perspectives and Experience" 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회 20 (20): 36-58, 2017

      6 Wang, A. I., "The wear out effect of a game-based student response system" 82 : 217-227, 2015

      7 Shaban, A. E., "The use of Socrative in ESL classrooms : Towards active learning" 17 (17): 64-77, 2017

      8 Hung, H. T., "The integration of a student response system in flipped classrooms" 21 (21): 16-27, 2017

      9 McDonough, K., "The impact of individual and shared clicker use on students’ collaborative learning" 86 : 236-249, 2015

      10 Kessler, G., "The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning" Wiley-Blackwell 278-292, 2017

      11 Alemi, M., "The effect of employing humanoid robots for teaching English on students’ anxiety and attitude" 2014

      12 Glassman, N. R., "Texting during class : Audience response systems" 12 (12): 59-71, 2015

      13 Kent, D., "Technique efficacy when using a student response system in the reading classroom" 23 (23): 26-35, 2019

      14 Penuel, W. R., "Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings : A survey study" 55 (55): 315-346, 2007

      15 Kaya, A., "Taking advantages of technologies : Using the Socrative in English language teaching classes" 2 (2): 4-12, 2016

      16 Wash, P. D., "Taking advantage of mobile devices : Using Socrative in the classroom" 3 (3): 99-101, 2014

      17 Krause, K., "Students’ engagement in first-year university" 33 (33): 493-505, 2008

      18 "Socrative [Mobile application software]"

      19 Green, A., "Significant returns in engagement and performance with a free teaching app" 47 (47): 1-10, 2016

      20 Singh, T. K. R., "Secondary students’ perspectives on the use of the interactive whiteboard for teaching and learning of science in Malaysia" 3 (3): 9-15, 2012

      21 Dörnyei, Z., "Research methods in applied linguistics" Oxford University Press 2007

      22 Manuguerra, M., "Promoting student engagement by integrating new technology into tertiary education : The role of the iPad" 7 (7): 61-65, 2011

      23 O’Malley, J. M., "Learning strategies in second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 1990

      24 Cardoso, W., "Learning a foreign language with a learner response system : The students’ perspective" 24 (24): 393-417, 2011

      25 Lin, Y. C., "Implementing clickers to assist learning in science lectures : The clicker-assisted conceptual change model" 27 (27): 979-996, 2011

      26 Stav, J., "Experiences obtained with integration of student response systems for IPod Touch and iPhone into elearning environments" 8 (8): 179-190, 2010

      27 Kay, R. H., "Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems : A review of the literature" 53 : 819-827, 2009

      28 Patterson, B., "Evidence for teaching practice : The impact of clickers in a large classroom environment" 30 (30): 603-607, 2010

      29 Stockwell, G., "Engaging in mobile phone-based activities for learning vocabulary : An investigation in Japan and Taiwan" 32 (32): 299-322, 2015

      30 FitzPatrick, K. A., "Effects of personal response system on students’ performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum" 35 : 280-289, 2011

      31 Chien, Y. T., "Do we click in the right way? A metaanalytic review of clicker-integrated instruction" 17 : 1-18, 2016

      32 Agbatogun, A. O., "Developing learners’ second language communicative competence through active learning: Clickers or communicative approach?" 17 (17): 257-269, 2014

      33 Martyn, M., "Clickers in the classroom : An active learning approach" 2 : 71-74, 2007

      34 Fies, C., "Classroom response systems : A review of the literature" 15 (15): 101-109, 2006

      35 Stowell, J. R., "Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning and emotion" 34 (34): 253-258, 2007

      36 Waters, S., "Apps-olutely perfect! Apps to support common core in the history/social studies classroom" 107 (107): 1-7, 2016

      37 차윤정, "An Alternative Method for Vocabulary Learning Using Quizlet" 영상영어교육학회 17 (17): 117-144, 2016

      38 Hunsu, N. J., "A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems(cliker-based technologies)on cognition and affect" 94 : 102-119, 2016

      39 Basoglu, E. B., "A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning : Using mobile phones and flash cards" 9 : 1-7, 2010

      40 Williams, J., "21st Century communication 2: Listening, speaking, and critical thinking" National Geographic Learning 2017

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-03-01 학술지명변경 한글명 : 영상영어교육(STEM Journal) -> 영상영어교육
      외국어명 : STEM Journal -> Journal of English Teaching through Movies and Media
      KCI등재
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.81 0.81 0.72
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.77 0.73 0.651 0.29
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼