온라인 정보해석 단서로서의 숫자의 앵커링 효과에 관한 연구: 인지된 현저성과 뉴스평가를 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aims to examine the effect of numerical cues in online news sites on interpreting online news information by applying the anchoring effect as a major concept. As a result of the analysis, the main effect and the interaction effect of the anchor size in research question 1 were significant, and the participants had a higher recognition of salience in the high anchor than in the low anchor. In the analysis of the news value evaluation of research question 2, the main effect and the interaction effect of the anchor size were significant, and the participants showed a higher news value evaluation in the high anchor than in the low anchor. This means that numeric anchors are transferred to news values. In conclusion, it was confirmed that the numeric anchor can make the news issue salient and important, and made the users give weight to the news rating. This study is meaningful in that it suggests the effect of online numeric clues on users’ interpreting information and user psychology.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김미희, "페이스북 친구의 뉴스추천이 뉴스신뢰도 인식과 뉴스관여 행동에 미치는 영향 : 인지정교화와 의견지도력을 중심으로" 한국언론학회 60 (60): 176-202, 2016

2 민영, "정치광고의 이슈현저성과 후보자 선호도에 대한 효과 : 이슈소유권(issue ownership)과 네거티브 소구(negative appeals)를 중심으로" 한국언론학회 50 (50): 108-131, 2006

3 김효숙, "쟁점의 부각여부와 개인적 관여도가 문제인식에 미치는 영향" 한국광고홍보학회 16 (16): 55-83, 2014

4 차동필, "쟁점유형별 공중의 문제인식 및 정보추구행동에 미치는 매스미디어의 영향에 관한 연구" 한국방송학회 16 (16): 458-489, 2002

5 배성우, "잡지에 대한 신뢰도와 광고 메시지 이해도가광고효과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국광고홍보학회 10 (10): 235-259, 2008

6 유홍식, "기사제목과 예시가 수용자의 뉴스가치 평가와이슈 지각에 미치는 영향" 한국언론학회 53 (53): 176-198, 2009

7 이종민, "광고 메시지 프레이밍 효과에 관한 연구: 개인적 관여도와 상황적 관여도의 역할 비교를 중심으로" 한국언론학회 51 (51): 282-307, 2007

8 차희원, "공중 관여도와 미디어 신뢰도에 따른 기업 명성의 미디어 의제 설정 효과 연구" 한국언론학회 48 (48): 274-303, 2004

9 L. Scissors, "What's in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook" 1501-1510, 2016

10 E. -J. Lee, "What do others’ reactions to news on Internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception" 37 (37): 825-846, 2010

11 Y. Min, "Using a split-ballot survey to explore the robustness of the ‘MIP’question in agenda-setting research: A methodological study" 19 (19): 221-236, 2007

12 S. Chaiken, "Unintended thought" 212-252, 1989

13 M. McLuhan, "Understanding media: The extensions of man" MIT press 1994

14 S. S. Sundar, "Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME): Four models for explaining how interface features affect user psychology" 2015

15 J. S. Gillis, "Too tall, too small" Institute for Personality and Ability Testing 1982

16 A. S. Edelstein, "Thinking about the Criterion Variable in Agenda-Setting Research" 43 (43): 85-99, 1993

17 S. Sudman, "Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology" 42 (42): 1997

18 J. R. Zaller, "The nature and origins of mass opinion" Cambridge university press 1992

19 J. Renkema, "The influence of negative newspaper publicity on corporate image in the Netherlands" 35 (35): 521-535, 1998

20 S. S. Lee, "The impact of social endorsement cues and manipulability concerns on perceptions of news credibility" 2021

21 M. H. Ashcraft, "The development of mental arithmetic: A chronometric approach" 2 (2): 213-236, 1982

22 S. S. Sundar, "The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility"

23 Network Information Center (CNNIC), "Statistical Report on Internet Development in China"

24 G. Golan, "Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates" 78 (78): 247-259, 2001

25 D. Kahneman, "Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment" 49 : 81-, 2002

26 R. E. Rice, "Organizational media affordances: Operationalization and associations with media use" 67 (67): 106-130, 2017

27 S. Iyengar, "News that matters: Television and American opinion" University of Chicago Press 2010

28 A. Tversky, "Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases" 185 (185): 1124-1131, 1974

29 H. A. Simon, "Information processing models of cognition" 30 (30): 363-396, 1979

30 C. R. Critcher, "Incidental environmental anchors" 21 (21): 241-251, 2008

31 S. Bellur, "How can we tell when a heuristic has been used? Design and analysis strategies for capturing the operation of heuristics" 8 (8): 116-137, 2014

32 J. L. Zaichkowsky, "Conceptualizing involvement" 15 (15): 4-34, 1986

33 R. E. Petty, "Communication and persuasion" Springer 1-24, 1986

34 R. F. Carter, "Communication and affective relations" 42 (42): 203-212, 1965

35 C. L. Brians, "Campaign issue knowledge and salience: Comparing reception from TV commercials, TV news and newspapers" 172-193, 1996

36 R. M. Hogarth, "Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics" 90 (90): 197-, 1981

37 J. W. Payne, "Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective" 43 (43): 87-131, 1992

38 D. M. Oppenheimer, "Anchors aweigh: A demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming" 106 (106): 13-26, 2008

39 B. W. Carlson, "Anchoring and adjustment in judgments under risk" 16 (16): 665-, 1990

40 B. Wansink, "An anchoring and adjustment model of purchase quantity decisions" 35 (35): 71-81, 1998