RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      화쟁사상을 둘러싼 쟁점 검토 = An investigation of the disputed point concerning Won-hyo(元曉)`s philosophy of dispute-reconciliation(和諍)

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      There has been two different types of study on the Won-hyo`s philosophy of dispute-reconciliation(和諍). One type is to connect the thought of dispute-reconciliation with the whole system of Won-hyo`s philosophy indiscriminately, another type is to treat them discriminately. The type of connecting the philosophy of dispute-reconciliation with the whole system of Won-hyo`s philosophy indiscriminately expands the category and meaning of the word dispute-reconciliation(和諍)` too much, thus deviates from the actual category and problem of dispute-reconciliation(和諍). ‘Dispute-reconciliation(和諍)’ is the word that has the desire to solve the concrete disputes, and Won-hyo must have to use the word with this meaning. The category of the philosophy of dispute-reconciliation(和諍) is the different understandings on the Buddhist theories, and the object of dispute-reconciliation(和諍) is the situation of exclusive confrontation and conflict and non-communication caused by it. The disagreement between ex-school of Yogacara(舊唯識) and neo-school of Yogacara(新唯識), and the confrontation of emptiness(空)·existence(有) of Madhyamaka(中觀)·Yogacara(唯識) cannot be regarded as the object of Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation(和諍). In order to understand the composition-principle of Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation argument(和諍論法), the contents and meaning of the source of dispute-reconciliation`s logic must be elucidated in detail. The source of dispute-reconciliation`s logic is to develop the capability to grasp the boundary line for the appropriate discrimination and decision of affirmation or negation. If Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation argument(和諍論法) is to be founded on that source, his dispute-reconciliation argument(和諍論法) could not only have the healing capability on the Buddhist disputes but have the universal capability of healing on mundane disputes. The research on Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation argument(和諍論法) hereafter needs to concentrate on this subject. Subject : Buddhist Philosophy, Philosophy of Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation
      번역하기

      There has been two different types of study on the Won-hyo`s philosophy of dispute-reconciliation(和諍). One type is to connect the thought of dispute-reconciliation with the whole system of Won-hyo`s philosophy indiscriminately, another type is to ...

      There has been two different types of study on the Won-hyo`s philosophy of dispute-reconciliation(和諍). One type is to connect the thought of dispute-reconciliation with the whole system of Won-hyo`s philosophy indiscriminately, another type is to treat them discriminately. The type of connecting the philosophy of dispute-reconciliation with the whole system of Won-hyo`s philosophy indiscriminately expands the category and meaning of the word dispute-reconciliation(和諍)` too much, thus deviates from the actual category and problem of dispute-reconciliation(和諍). ‘Dispute-reconciliation(和諍)’ is the word that has the desire to solve the concrete disputes, and Won-hyo must have to use the word with this meaning. The category of the philosophy of dispute-reconciliation(和諍) is the different understandings on the Buddhist theories, and the object of dispute-reconciliation(和諍) is the situation of exclusive confrontation and conflict and non-communication caused by it. The disagreement between ex-school of Yogacara(舊唯識) and neo-school of Yogacara(新唯識), and the confrontation of emptiness(空)·existence(有) of Madhyamaka(中觀)·Yogacara(唯識) cannot be regarded as the object of Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation(和諍). In order to understand the composition-principle of Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation argument(和諍論法), the contents and meaning of the source of dispute-reconciliation`s logic must be elucidated in detail. The source of dispute-reconciliation`s logic is to develop the capability to grasp the boundary line for the appropriate discrimination and decision of affirmation or negation. If Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation argument(和諍論法) is to be founded on that source, his dispute-reconciliation argument(和諍論法) could not only have the healing capability on the Buddhist disputes but have the universal capability of healing on mundane disputes. The research on Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation argument(和諍論法) hereafter needs to concentrate on this subject. Subject : Buddhist Philosophy, Philosophy of Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이도흠, "화쟁 철학과 탈현대 철학의 비교연구" 3 : 2009

      2 최연식, "원효의 화쟁사상의 논의방식과 사상사적 의미" 보조사상연구원 (25) : 405-462, 2006

      3 박재현, "원효의 화쟁사상에 대한 再考 -화쟁의 소통(疏通)적 맥락" (8) : 2001

      4 이기영, "원효의 화쟁사상과 오늘의 통일문제" 한국불교연구원 2 : 2001

      5 김형효, "원효에서 다산까지" 청계 2000

      6 박태원, "원효 화쟁사상의 보편 원리" 새한철학회 4 (4): 2004

      7 이종익, "원효" 예문서원 2002

      8 박성배, "원효" 예문서원 2002

      9 남동신, "동아시아불교와 원효의 화쟁사상" 원효학회 10 : 2005

      10 이효걸, "元曉의 和諍思想에 대한 재검토" 불교학연구회 4 : 1-34, 2002

      1 이도흠, "화쟁 철학과 탈현대 철학의 비교연구" 3 : 2009

      2 최연식, "원효의 화쟁사상의 논의방식과 사상사적 의미" 보조사상연구원 (25) : 405-462, 2006

      3 박재현, "원효의 화쟁사상에 대한 再考 -화쟁의 소통(疏通)적 맥락" (8) : 2001

      4 이기영, "원효의 화쟁사상과 오늘의 통일문제" 한국불교연구원 2 : 2001

      5 김형효, "원효에서 다산까지" 청계 2000

      6 박태원, "원효 화쟁사상의 보편 원리" 새한철학회 4 (4): 2004

      7 이종익, "원효" 예문서원 2002

      8 박성배, "원효" 예문서원 2002

      9 남동신, "동아시아불교와 원효의 화쟁사상" 원효학회 10 : 2005

      10 이효걸, "元曉의 和諍思想에 대한 재검토" 불교학연구회 4 : 1-34, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼