화쟁사상을 둘러싼 쟁점 검토 = An investigation of the disputed point concerning Won-hyo(元曉)`s philosophy of dispute-reconciliation(和諍)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There has been two different types of study on the Won-hyo`s philosophy of dispute-reconciliation(和諍). One type is to connect the thought of dispute-reconciliation with the whole system of Won-hyo`s philosophy indiscriminately, another type is to treat them discriminately. The type of connecting the philosophy of dispute-reconciliation with the whole system of Won-hyo`s philosophy indiscriminately expands the category and meaning of the word dispute-reconciliation(和諍)` too much, thus deviates from the actual category and problem of dispute-reconciliation(和諍). ‘Dispute-reconciliation(和諍)’ is the word that has the desire to solve the concrete disputes, and Won-hyo must have to use the word with this meaning. The category of the philosophy of dispute-reconciliation(和諍) is the different understandings on the Buddhist theories, and the object of dispute-reconciliation(和諍) is the situation of exclusive confrontation and conflict and non-communication caused by it. The disagreement between ex-school of Yogacara(舊唯識) and neo-school of Yogacara(新唯識), and the confrontation of emptiness(空)·existence(有) of Madhyamaka(中觀)·Yogacara(唯識) cannot be regarded as the object of Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation(和諍). In order to understand the composition-principle of Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation argument(和諍論法), the contents and meaning of the source of dispute-reconciliation`s logic must be elucidated in detail. The source of dispute-reconciliation`s logic is to develop the capability to grasp the boundary line for the appropriate discrimination and decision of affirmation or negation. If Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation argument(和諍論法) is to be founded on that source, his dispute-reconciliation argument(和諍論法) could not only have the healing capability on the Buddhist disputes but have the universal capability of healing on mundane disputes. The research on Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation argument(和諍論法) hereafter needs to concentrate on this subject. Subject : Buddhist Philosophy, Philosophy of Won-hyo`s dispute-reconciliation

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이도흠, "화쟁 철학과 탈현대 철학의 비교연구" 3 : 2009

2 최연식, "원효의 화쟁사상의 논의방식과 사상사적 의미" 보조사상연구원 (25) : 405-462, 2006

3 박재현, "원효의 화쟁사상에 대한 再考 －화쟁의 소통(疏通)적 맥락" (8) : 2001

4 이기영, "원효의 화쟁사상과 오늘의 통일문제" 한국불교연구원 2 : 2001

5 김형효, "원효에서 다산까지" 청계 2000

6 박태원, "원효 화쟁사상의 보편 원리" 새한철학회 4 (4): 2004

7 이종익, "원효" 예문서원 2002

8 박성배, "원효" 예문서원 2002

9 남동신, "동아시아불교와 원효의 화쟁사상" 원효학회 10 : 2005

10 이효걸, "元曉의 和諍思想에 대한 재검토" 불교학연구회 4 : 1-34, 2002