RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Clinical Outcomes of Intraoperative Radiofrequency Abla- tion in Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients Ineligible for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation or Surgical Resection = Clinical Outcomes of Intraoperative Radiofrequency Abla- tion in Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients Ineligible for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation or Surgical Resection

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101962850

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Aims: Intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with relatively poor liver function to undergo surgical resection or when percutaneous approach for RFA is not feasible due ...

      Aims: Intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with relatively poor liver function to undergo surgical resection or when percutaneous approach for RFA is not feasible due to the difficult location of the tumor. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of intraoperative RFA compared to surgical resection. Methods: A total of 76 consecutive patients who received either intraoperative RFA (n=23) or surgical resection (n=53) with curative intent at the Incheon St Mary``s hospital from June 2012 to September 2015 were enrolled. Disease free survival and overall survival rates were analyzed. Results: The median follow-up period was 20.1 months (range, 0.9-41.5). The mean baseline Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was higher in the RFA group compared to the resection group (11.5±4.7 vs. 7.8±1.5, p=0.001). The resection group consisted of larger tumors with the median diameter of 2.7cm (range, 1-16) compared to 2cm (range, 1-5) of the RFA group (p=0.002). However, there was no difference in the number of tumors and the tumor stage between the two groups. The disease free survival rates at 6 and 12 months were 81.6%, 74.8% in the RFA group and 92.2%, 86.2% in the resection group, respectively (p=0.256). The overall survival rates at one year were 91.3% in the RFA group and 94.3% in the resection group, respectively (p=0.635). In the RFA group, 5 patients (21.7%) received liver transplantation (LT) after median interval of 10.9 months (range, 9.2~26.4) since the intraoperative RFA. Conclusions: The patients who received intraoperative RFA presented with relatively poor liver function but the disease free survival and overall survival rates were non-inferior compared to the patients who underwent resection. Therefore, intraoperative RFA may be considered as a useful option for patients ineligible to percutaneous RFA and surgical resection, or as a bridge therapy before liver transplantation.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼