This study was conducted in order to advance content analysis on the history of Korea‐China relationship by enhancing accessibility to diplomatic documents called 'Juhansagwandang(駐韓使館檔:Documents of Chinese diplomatic offices in Korea)' in...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60014431
2011
Korean
한중관계 ; 외교당안 ; 주한사관 ; 화교 ; 주한사관보존당 ; 조선당 ; 청안 ; 청계중일한관계사료 ; 韓中關係 ; 外交檔案 ; 駐韓使館 ; 華僑 ; 駐韓使館保存檔 ; 朝鮮檔 ; 淸案 ; 淸季中日韓關係史料 ; Korea-China relationship ; Diplomatic Documents ; Chinese diplomatic offices in Korea ; Overseas Chinese ; Documents of Chinese diplomatic offices in Korea(Juhansagwandang) ; Chosundang ; Cheongan ; Historical Materials on China-Japan-Korea Relation in the Qing Dynasty
912
KCI등재
학술저널
35-73(39쪽)
21
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study was conducted in order to advance content analysis on the history of Korea‐China relationship by enhancing accessibility to diplomatic documents called 'Juhansagwandang(駐韓使館檔:Documents of Chinese diplomatic offices in Korea)' in...
This study was conducted in order to advance content analysis on the history of Korea‐China relationship by enhancing accessibility to diplomatic documents called 'Juhansagwandang(駐韓使館檔:Documents of Chinese diplomatic offices in Korea)' in a historical, academic or practical sense. Based on the contents reviewed in this study, we can summarize the characteristics and values of 'Juhansagwandang' in the history of Korea‐China relationship as follows.
First, the documents include extensive general materials, which mean unofficial documents worthy to be preserved. Official documents exchanged between Korean and Chinese diplomatic agencies include few general materials worthy to be preserved. Although some are included as accompanying documents, the scope of such documents is very limited. In the sense that they are documents of Chinese diplomatic offices in Korea, such records contain administrative information such as documents prepared, executed or received for administration. As they contain extensive unofficial documents (=general materials) worthy to be preserved, they have historical values.
Second, 'Juhansagwandang' are in a mutually complementary relation with Korean diplomatic documents 'Cheongan(淸案).' It is presumed that even many of preserved documents might be lost due to instable political situations at home and overseas during the late Qing Dynasty and the late Yi Dynasty. In many cases, for example, there is jobok(照覆) but without johoi(照會) or vice versa, and this suggests that the continuity of documents could not be maintained due to various factors. Moreover, because diplomatic documents contained in Juhansagwandang and Cheongan were in a request‐reply relation with each other, their contents are sometimes complementary to each other. Furthermore, by comparing two documents on the same issue, we may find clues to differences between the two countries' positions.
Third, media carrying contents have the characteristics that they are the tangible original documents. Previous studies on the Korea China relationship in the late Qing Dynasty have relied on diplomatic documents as the records of objective facts in order to examine factual contents related to the relationship of the two countries. Juhansagwandang, which was published as digital materials, is tangible original documents and also contains historical information, and in this sense, it has two values. They have crucial meanings in exploring not only contents but also the actual form and generation process of diplomatic documents. How to interpret such original documents is still a problem to be solved.
Fourth, the documents were classified according to the principle of source classification. The classification system of Juhansagwandang followed 'the principle of source, ' which gives priority to the organization handling documents over the contents of documents. This classification system is advantageous in that it shows structure, context, and activity processes involved in an organization's production of records. That is, it is efficient for understanding association among records according to source, and the relation between records and their producers and the background of their production.
Fifth, documents during a specific period were completely scattered and lost. Juhansagwandang includes documents generated and accumulated by Chinese diplomatic offices for around 30 years from 1883 to 1913. However, documents for around 4 years from the end of 1894 to the end of 1898 are completely omitted. A very small number of documents in this period have survived, but they are quite exceptional. Some institutions preserve only a part of documents according to their value, but the loss of documents in this period seems to be accidental. It is not clear where the lost records are kept at present.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "「조선왕조실록」 고종 24권 6월 18일조"
2 吳汝綸, "李文忠公全集" 文海出版社 5-, 1980
3 이영옥, "한중 민간소송연구, 1906-1910―導之案姚貴春案劉金有案 등 살인사건을 중심으로 ―" 중국근현대사학회 (35) : 1-30, 2007
4 손정목, "한국개항기 도시변화과정연구" 일지사 169-178, 1994
5 이 은 자, "한국 개항기(1876~1910) 중국의 治外法權 적용 논리와 한국의 대응 ―韓中間 조약 체결 과정을 중심으로" 동양사학회 (92) : 187-227, 2005
6 姜昌錫, "통감부연구 - 이사청의 조직과 성격을 중심으로" 13 : 45-, 1987
7 朴慶龍, "통감부 이사청연구 - 京城理事廳을 중심으로" 85 : 112-, 1994
8 김용구, "춤추는 회의-비엔나 회의 외교" 나남 110-111, 1997
9 권석봉, "청일전쟁 이후의 한청관계연구(1894~1989), In 청일전쟁을 전후한 한국과 열강" 한국정신문화연구원 1984
10 권오현, "구한말의 韓獨 외교문서 德案 연구" 서울대학교출판부 2008
1 "「조선왕조실록」 고종 24권 6월 18일조"
2 吳汝綸, "李文忠公全集" 文海出版社 5-, 1980
3 이영옥, "한중 민간소송연구, 1906-1910―導之案姚貴春案劉金有案 등 살인사건을 중심으로 ―" 중국근현대사학회 (35) : 1-30, 2007
4 손정목, "한국개항기 도시변화과정연구" 일지사 169-178, 1994
5 이 은 자, "한국 개항기(1876~1910) 중국의 治外法權 적용 논리와 한국의 대응 ―韓中間 조약 체결 과정을 중심으로" 동양사학회 (92) : 187-227, 2005
6 姜昌錫, "통감부연구 - 이사청의 조직과 성격을 중심으로" 13 : 45-, 1987
7 朴慶龍, "통감부 이사청연구 - 京城理事廳을 중심으로" 85 : 112-, 1994
8 김용구, "춤추는 회의-비엔나 회의 외교" 나남 110-111, 1997
9 권석봉, "청일전쟁 이후의 한청관계연구(1894~1989), In 청일전쟁을 전후한 한국과 열강" 한국정신문화연구원 1984
10 권오현, "구한말의 韓獨 외교문서 德案 연구" 서울대학교출판부 2008
11 김희신, "駐朝鮮使館의 화교 실태조사와 관리 ― 청일전쟁 이전 漢城ㆍ仁川을 중심으로 ―" 명청사학회 (34) : 205-236, 2010
12 이은자, "韓淸通商條約 시기(1900~1905) 중국의 在韓 치외법권 연구" 명청사학회 (26) : 89-121, 2006
13 "韓日協商條約(1905년 11월 17일), 舊韓末條約彙纂(上)"
14 "韓國倂合ニ關スル宣言(1910년 8월 29일), 舊韓末條約彙纂(上)"
15 石川亮太, "開港期漢城における朝鮮人·中國人間の商取引と紛爭-駐韓使館檔案を通じて" 10 : 2007
16 "舊韓末條約彙纂(下)"
17 김희신, "淸末(1882-1894년) 漢城 華商組織과 그 位相" 중국근현대사학회 (46) : 53-80, 2010
18 이은자, "淸末 駐韓 商務署 組織과 그 位相" 명청사학회 (30) : 359-396, 2008
19 이영옥, "淸朝와 朝鮮(大韓帝國)의 외교관계, 1895~1910" 한국중국학회 50 : 217-236, 2004
20 王鐵崖, "淸日通商行船條約(1896년 6월 11일 체결, 9월 21일 비준 교환)" 三聯書店 662-663, 1981
21 이은자, "淸日戰爭 이전과 이후 在韓 韓中間 ‘訴訟’ 안건 비교 분석" 아시아문화연구소 17 : 45-65, 2009
22 "淸宣統朝外交史料 권 16"
23 "外衙門日記"
24 李恩涵, "唐紹儀与晩淸外交" (4) : 1973
25 정태섭, "乙巳條約 이후 韓 ‧ 淸 간 治外法權 연구(1906~1910)" 한국근현대사학회 (46) : 53-80, 2008
26 "中日戰爭 4, 中國近代史資料叢刊 續編"
27 王鐵崖, "中外舊約章滙編 1"
28 川島 眞, "中國近代外交の形成" 名古屋大學出版社 65-69, 2004
29 吳東之, "中國外交史 2: 中華民國時期 1911-1949" 河南人民出版社 5-6, 1988
30 김희신, "‘漢城 開設行棧 조항 개정’ 교섭과 중국의 대응" 동양사학회 (113) : 199-244, 2010
31 이은자, "Chinese Diplomatic Mission in Korea in the Post-Sino-Japanese War Period: The Terms of Consul General Tang Shaoyi and Legate Xu Shoupeng" 6 (6): 2009
32 박정현, "19세기 말 仁川과 漢城의 중국인 居留地 운영체제" 동양사학회 (113) : 171-198, 2010
33 이은자, "19世紀末 在朝鮮 未開口岸의 淸商 密貿易 관련 領事裁判案件 硏究" 동양사학회 (111) : 233-265, 2010
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2022 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
2018-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 1.17 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.99 | 0.87 | 2.008 | 0.29 |