1 Glover,J.A, "The “testing” phenomonon: Not gone but nearly forgotten" 81 (81): 392-399, 1989
2 Roediger, H. L, "The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice" 2 : 31-74, 2006
3 Veloski, J. J, "Patients don’t present with five choices: An alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physician’s competence" 74 : 539-546, 1999
4 Park,J, "Learning in a new computerized testing system" 97 (97): 436-443, 2005
5 Braswell, J, "Item formats for assessment in mathematics. In Construction versus Choice in cognitive Measurement." Lawrence Erlbaum Associate 1993
6 Blaxton,T, "Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework" 15 : 657-668, 1989
7 Landauer, T. K, "Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis" 25 : 259-284, 1998
8 Sireci, S. G, "Innoviative item formats in computer-based testing: In pursuit of construct representation ㅑㅜ Handbook of test development" Lawrence Earlbaum Associate 2006
9 Parshall, C. G, "Innovative item types for computerized testing. In Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and Practice" Kluwer Academic Publishers 129-148, 2000
10 Carpenter, S. K, "Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect" 34 : 268-276, 2006
1 Glover,J.A, "The “testing” phenomonon: Not gone but nearly forgotten" 81 (81): 392-399, 1989
2 Roediger, H. L, "The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice" 2 : 31-74, 2006
3 Veloski, J. J, "Patients don’t present with five choices: An alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physician’s competence" 74 : 539-546, 1999
4 Park,J, "Learning in a new computerized testing system" 97 (97): 436-443, 2005
5 Braswell, J, "Item formats for assessment in mathematics. In Construction versus Choice in cognitive Measurement." Lawrence Erlbaum Associate 1993
6 Blaxton,T, "Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework" 15 : 657-668, 1989
7 Landauer, T. K, "Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis" 25 : 259-284, 1998
8 Sireci, S. G, "Innoviative item formats in computer-based testing: In pursuit of construct representation ㅑㅜ Handbook of test development" Lawrence Earlbaum Associate 2006
9 Parshall, C. G, "Innovative item types for computerized testing. In Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and Practice" Kluwer Academic Publishers 129-148, 2000
10 Carpenter, S. K, "Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect" 34 : 268-276, 2006
11 Park, J, "Higher retentention after a new take-home computerized test" 39 (39): 538-547, 2008
12 Kulhavy, R. W, "Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests" 63 (63): 505-512, 1972
13 Surber, J. R, "Delay-retention effect in natural classroom settings" 67 (67): 170-172, 1976
14 Leacock & Chodrow, "C-rater: Automatied scoring of the short-answer questions" 37 : 389-405, 2003
15 Rudner, L. M, "Automated essay scoring using Bayes' theorem" 1 (1): 2002