조선후기 手本의 한 연구 : 慶州 驪州李氏 癡菴宗宅 소장 고문서를 중심으로 = A study of Su-bon(手本) in the Joseon dynasty

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this thesis, I reviewed the document called 'Su-bon(手本)' which has never been introduced. There are many kinds of Su-bon, meanwhile we have known them as official document.
But I would try to give another type of Su-bon a term of 'Sojihyung Su-bon (所志型 手本)' that have similar shapes of 'Soji(所志)' which had been submitted a petition to a local government. And looking into Su-bon, I studied what it had forms, contents, writings, processes of disposition.
After through out all these analysis, I could reach the several conclusions below.
First. Writers of Su-bon were peoples, servants, officials of the smallest unit of the administrative organization(ex. 風？, 上任, 洞任 etc.) When they submitted Su-bon, there were not in the name of an individual but a joint signature at least four persons.
Second. Forms of Su-bon were similar to a kinds of 'So-ji' which had been submitted a petition to a local government. Besides a 'So-ji' of the most similar to 'Deong-jang(等狀, a petition which had been submitted to official government in many people's signatures), nothing but just replace Su-bon with So-ji.
Third. The measuring organization of Su-bon were the competent authorities (本官) and Royal secret inspector(暗行御史). In spite of a same content of petition, submitted to the provincial authorities(監司), not written as Su-bon but Ui-song(議送, a petition which had been submitted to the provincial authorities)
Forth. The contents of Su-bon were not concerned with personal dispute but a tax . Especially that was something to do with the tax which have relation to a local society's interests.
Fifth. Based on forth, the matter was concerned with official affairs. So in the process of handling the matter, the government office should have intervened in it eagerly.
According to the conclusion above, we can know another side of Su-bon which have a different style except for the side of Su-bon as 'a public report'. Generally there were many kinds of written petition, just like a group of So-ji (所志類), for instance So-ji(所志), Bal-gwal(白活, this is pronounced natively in Korea), Dan-ja(單子), Sang-seo(上書) and exceptionally in addition to another document, called 'Su-bon' that have never ever been known to.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 자료소개
• 3. 수본의 형식과 내용
• 4. 수본의 처리과정
• 5. 결론
• 참고문헌
• [Abstract]

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 전경목, "｢朝鮮後期 所志類에 나타나는 '化民'에 대하｣" 6 : 1994

2 임상혁, "｢朝鮮前期 民事訴訟과 訴訟理論의 展開｣" 2003

3 박병호, "현대의 소송과 고문서" 19 : 2001

4 김경숙, "조선후기 山訟과 사회갈등연구" 2002

5 "박물관 도록:고문서" 전북대학교 박물관 1999

6 玉山慶州李氏章山書院癡菴宗宅篇, "고문서집성 66" 한국정신문화연구원 2003

7 최승희, "韓國古文書硏究" ^지식산업사 1989

8 전경목, "朝鮮後期 山訟 硏究 -18·19C 古文書를 中心으로-" 1996

9 박병호, "去來와 訴訟의 文書生活 , 湖南地方古文書基礎硏究" 한국정신문화연구원 1999

10 慶州 伊助 慶州崔氏龍山書院篇, "^고문서집성 50" 한국정신문화연구원 2000

11 慶州 慶州孫氏篇, "^고문서집성 32" 한국정신문화연구원 1997

12 전경목, "16세기 관문서의 서식 연구, 16세기 한국 고문서 연구" 아카넷 2004

13 김경숙, "16세기 請願書의 처리절차와 議送의 의미" 한국고문서학회 24 : 73-106, 2004