Is Radical Perineal Prostatectomy a Viable Therapeutic Option for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer?

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The aim of this study was to investigate a single-institution experience with radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP), radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) with respect to onco-surgical outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk (IR; PSA 10-20 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason score bGS 7 or cT2b-2c) and highrisk (HR; PSA >20 ng/mL, bGS ≥8, or ≥cT3) prostate cancer (PCa). We retrospectively reviewed data from 2,581 men who underwent radical prostatectomy for IR and HR PCa (RPP, n = 689; RRP, n = 402; MIRP, n = 1,490 [laparoscopic, n = 206; robot-assisted laparoscopic, n = 1,284]). The proportion of HR PCa was 40.3%, 46.8%, and 49.5% in RPP, RRP, and MIRP (P < 0.001), respectively. The positive surgical margin rate was 23.8%, 26.1%, and 18.7% (P = 0.002) overall, 17.5%, 17.8%, and 8.8% (P < 0.001) for pT2 disease and 41.9%, 44.4%, and 40.0% (P = 0.55) for pT3 disease in men undergoing RPP, RRP, and MIRP, respectively. Biochemical recurrence-free survival rates among RPP, RRP, and MIRP were 73.0%, 70.1%, and 76.8%, respectively, at 5 yr (RPP vs. RPP, P = 0.02; RPP vs. MIRP, P = 0.23). Furthermore, comparable 5-yr metastases-free survival rates were demonstrated for specific surgical approaches (RPP vs. RPP, P = 0.26; RPP vs.

MIRP, P = 0.06). RPP achieved acceptable oncological control for IR and HR PCa.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Tewari AK, "Visual cues as a surrogate for tactile feedback during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy : posterolateral margin rates in 1340 consecutive patients" 106 : 528-536, 2010

2 Briganti A, "Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection : the essential importance of percentage of positive cores" 61 : 480-487, 2012

3 Cooperberg MR, "Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE)" 170 : S21-S25, 2003

4 Parra RO, "The value of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in conjunction with radical perineal or retropubic prostatectomy" 151 : 1599-1602, 1994

5 Young HH, "The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate : being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in 4 cases" 16 : 315-321, 1905

6 Feifer AH, "Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy" 117 : 3933-3942, 2011

7 Ahlering TE, "Robotassisted versus open radical prostatectomy : a comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes" 63 : 819-822, 2004

8 Joniau S, "Results of surgery for high-risk prostate cancer" 23 : 342-348, 2013

9 Nargund VH, "Radical prostatectomy: too soon to abandon the perineal approach?" 8 : 179-180, 2011

10 Boccon-Gibod L, "Radical prostatectomy: open? Laparoscopic? Robotic?" 49 : 598-599, 2006

11 Ischia J, "Radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer" 20 : 290-300, 2013

12 Salomon L, "Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center" 42 : 104-110, 2002

13 Furubayashi N, "Radical prostatectomy as radical cure of prostate cancer in a high-risk group : A single-institution experience" 1 : 337-342, 2013

14 Comploj E, "Radical perineal prostatectomy: an outdated procedure?" 9 : 400-403, 2011

15 Eliya F, "Radical perineal prostatectomy: a learning curve?" 43 : 139-142, 2011

16 Eggener SE, "Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy" 185 : 869-875, 2011

17 Rodrigues G, "Pre-treatment risk stratification of prostate cancer patients : a critical review" 6 : 121-127, 2012

18 Herrmann TR, "Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?" 25 : 149-160, 2007

19 Mohler J, "NCCN clinical prac-tice guidelines in oncology : prostate cancer" 8 : 162-200, 2010

20 Busch J, "Matched comparison of outcomes following open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk patients" 32 : 1411-1416, 2014

21 Pierorazio PM, "Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen" 76 : 715-721, 2010

22 Gianino MM, "Costs in surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy : a review of the current state" 88 : 1-5, 2012

23 Lezin MS, "Comparison of laparoscopic and minilaparotomy pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer staging in a community practice" 49 : 60-63, 1997

24 Kawakami J, "Changing patterns of pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE" 176 : 1382-1386, 2006

25 Catalona WJ, "Cancer recurrence and survival rates after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer : intermediate-term results" 160 : 2428-2434, 1998

26 Rozet F, "A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : a single institution experience" 178 : 478-482, 2007

27 Abdollah F, "A critical assessment of the value of lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy : A population-based study" 71 : 1587-1594, 2011

28 Smith JA Jr, "A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy" 178 : 2385-2389, 2007

29 Mirza M, "A comparison of radical perineal, radical retropubic, and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies in a single surgeon series" 2011 : 878323-, 2011