RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      평화와 인권 -서독 정부의 대동독 인권정책과 대북 인권정책을 위한 합의 = Peace and Human Rights -The Human Rights Policy of West German Governments and its Implications for the South Korean Policy on North Korean Human Rights

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A89512384

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The West German policies on East German human rights from 1949 to 1990 can be classified into the following three types. The first type (Type I) was ``hostile human right policy`` toward the communist regime. Based on the militant anti-communism and the political and ideological condemnation it is aimed at the overthrow of the communist regime in the GDR through various propaganda activities and strategies. It didn``t allowed any official dialogue and negotiation with the East German political leaders to improve the situation of human rights in the GDR. The second type (type Ⅱ) of the normative human rights policy is grounded on the democratic critique of communism. While rejecting the militant anti-communism and Cold War political culture rooted in hostility and confrontation, it showed an interest in freedom, self-determination and human rights as universal values and principles and gave fundamental and normative censure on the human rights abuses in the communist system. Finally, the West German governments in the 1970s and 1980s carried out the practical human rights policy(Type Ⅲ) toward the GDR. The core of this policy was to seek harmony and reconciliation from antagonism and confrontation and, by dong so, to relieve concrete human sufferings and improve the human rights conditions in the GDR gradually and realistically. Constant dialogue with the Communist rulers was essential and desirable. A lot of humanitarian issues could be resolved by negotiations that were focused on each specific issues. Just as the West German governments had done since the late 1960s, in my opinion, the government of South Korea should adopt in the long run both the type Ⅱ and the type Ⅱ human rights policies in parallel and combined fashion, but not the type I. On the one hand, it should constantly monitor human rights abuses of the North Korean regime and clearly criticize North Korean political leaders based on the normative standards of human rights. On the other hand, we must remember that the most important dimension of the human rights policies has something to do with the pragmatic and realistic way. In addition, the German experience shows the importance of the political consensus on the possible combination of the normative and pragmatic dimensions of the human rights policies. It is imperative that various South Korean politicians and NGOs agree among themselves on the coexistence or parallel development strategy of making peace with the communist regime and on the criticism of its human right situation.
      번역하기

      The West German policies on East German human rights from 1949 to 1990 can be classified into the following three types. The first type (Type I) was ``hostile human right policy`` toward the communist regime. Based on the militant anti-communism and t...

      The West German policies on East German human rights from 1949 to 1990 can be classified into the following three types. The first type (Type I) was ``hostile human right policy`` toward the communist regime. Based on the militant anti-communism and the political and ideological condemnation it is aimed at the overthrow of the communist regime in the GDR through various propaganda activities and strategies. It didn``t allowed any official dialogue and negotiation with the East German political leaders to improve the situation of human rights in the GDR. The second type (type Ⅱ) of the normative human rights policy is grounded on the democratic critique of communism. While rejecting the militant anti-communism and Cold War political culture rooted in hostility and confrontation, it showed an interest in freedom, self-determination and human rights as universal values and principles and gave fundamental and normative censure on the human rights abuses in the communist system. Finally, the West German governments in the 1970s and 1980s carried out the practical human rights policy(Type Ⅲ) toward the GDR. The core of this policy was to seek harmony and reconciliation from antagonism and confrontation and, by dong so, to relieve concrete human sufferings and improve the human rights conditions in the GDR gradually and realistically. Constant dialogue with the Communist rulers was essential and desirable. A lot of humanitarian issues could be resolved by negotiations that were focused on each specific issues. Just as the West German governments had done since the late 1960s, in my opinion, the government of South Korea should adopt in the long run both the type Ⅱ and the type Ⅱ human rights policies in parallel and combined fashion, but not the type I. On the one hand, it should constantly monitor human rights abuses of the North Korean regime and clearly criticize North Korean political leaders based on the normative standards of human rights. On the other hand, we must remember that the most important dimension of the human rights policies has something to do with the pragmatic and realistic way. In addition, the German experience shows the importance of the political consensus on the possible combination of the normative and pragmatic dimensions of the human rights policies. It is imperative that various South Korean politicians and NGOs agree among themselves on the coexistence or parallel development strategy of making peace with the communist regime and on the criticism of its human right situation.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼