성관계 제안을 거절당한 사람의 행동 양상과 설득에 의한 성관계 동의 수준 평가의 성차: 연인 관계를 중심으로 = Gender Difference in Evaluating the Behavior Patterns of Who Were Rejected When Sexual Advances and the Level of Consent to Sexual Relations by Persuasion : Focusing on Romantic Relationship

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

his study examined sexual communication in romantic relationship focusing on the patterns of behavior of those whose sexual advances have been rejected. Study 1 investigated the behavior patterns of those who were rejected when making sexual advances by using a romantic relationship scenario. Study 2 explored how participants predicted the behavior patterns of those who were rejected depending on the gender of the rejectee. We also analyzed how participants evaluated the level of consent to sexual relations depending on the viewpoint of those who made the sexual advance or those who compliance, when the sexual relations by persuasion. The behavior patterns of those who were rejected were classified into five factors including ‘showing discomfort and manipulation’, ‘concern about changes in relationship’, ‘approach and persuasion’, ‘respect and acceptance’, and ‘consideration of feeling.’ In condition where the man was rejected, male participants were most likely to do ‘respect and acceptance’ behavior, whereas female participants were most likely to do ‘approach and persuasion’ behavior. In condition where the woman was rejected, both male and female participants were likely to do ‘respect and acceptance’ behavior. In condition where man had a sexual relation with women through persuasion, female participants rated the perceived women's level of consent who complied with the sexual relations lower than male participants. They also rated the men's perceived women's level of consent higher than male participants. In condition where woman had a sexual relation with men through persuasion, the male participants rated the perceived man's level of consent who complied with the sexual relations higher than female counterparts. Such results were discussed in sexual scripts and cognitive dissonance, and suggested of the risk of date rape.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 시사IN, "한국 사회 흔든 ‘성인지 감수성’"

2 유외숙, "이성교제에서 원하지 않는 성관계 요구의 응낙에 대한 설명모형-대학생중심으로-" 한국상담심리학회 16 (16): 793-812, 2004

3 손강숙, "여대생의 성역할 고정관념과 데이트폭력허용도의 관계에서 성적 자기주장의 매개효과" 한국여성심리학회 21 (21): 441-457, 2016

4 하정희, "여대생의 거절민감성과 성적 자기주장의 관계에서 단절 및 거절도식의 매개 효과" 한국여성심리학회 24 (24): 47-66, 2019

5 양동옥, "성행동 상황에서 여성의 거절 평가에 주변 단서가 미치는 영향 : 이성교제를 중심으로" 한국청소년학회 23 (23): 335-358, 2016

6 양동옥, "성행동 상황에서 여성의 거절 이유 평가의 성차" 한국여성심리학회 20 (20): 205-224, 2015

7 이은진, "성적 자기결정권에 대한 심리학 연구" 한국여성심리학회 20 (20): 427-441, 2015

8 안지인, "성인의 원하지 않는 성행동 응낙과 애착이 이성관계만족에 미치는 영향" 한국여성심리학회 19 (19): 233-251, 2014

9 윤가현, "성 문화와 심리" 학지사 2016

10 김영희, "대학생의 성적 자기주장에 영향을 미치는 요인" 한국여성건강간호학회 19 (19): 166-175, 2013

11 심정신, "대학생의 성역할 고정관념, 성폭력 인지도 및 성폭력 허용도에 관한 연구" 한국여성건강간호학회 18 (18): 117-125, 2012

12 이지연, "대학생의 데이트 성폭력 피해와 가해에 대한 설명모형" 한국상담심리학회 17 (17): 419-436, 2005

13 김정애, "국내 대학생들의 성경험 실태 및 성경험 예측 요인 분석" 사단법인 대한보건협회 40 (40): 71-80, 2014

14 공정식, "강간과 화간의 연속선상여성이 겉으로 ‘거절 또는 침묵’한 이유" 한국법심리학회 8 (8): 229-251, 2017

15 이안나, "‘모텔 이야기’: 신자유주의시대 대학생들의 모텔활용과 성적 실천의 의미 변화" 여성연구소 23 (23): 41-73, 2013

16 Shotland, R. L., "Women’s"token resistant"and compliant sexual behaviors are related to uncertain sexual intentions and rape" 21 (21): 226-236, 1995

17 Impett, E. A., "Why some women consent to unwanted sex with a dating partner : Insights from attachment theory" 26 (26): 360-370, 2002

18 Meston, C. M., "Why humans have sex" 36 (36): 477-507, 2007

19 Birnbaum, G. E., "When sex is more than just sex : Attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality" 91 (91): 929-943, 2006

20 Sprecher, S., "Token resistance to sexual intercourse and consent to unwanted intercourse : College students’ dating experiences in three countries" 31 (31): 125-132, 1994

21 Muehlenhard, C. L., "Token resistance to sex : New perspectives on and old stereotype" 22 (22): 443-463, 1998

22 Van Wie, V, E., "The role of woman’s explanations for refusal on men’s ability to discriminate unwanted sexual behavior in a date rape scenario" 16 (16): 331-334, 2001

23 Wiederman, M. W., "The gendered nature of sexual scripts" 13 (13): 496-502, 2005

24 Loshek, E., "The development of Sexual Assertiveness Questionnaire(SAQ) : A comprehensive measure of sexual assertive for women" 52 (52): 1017-1027, 2015

25 Struckman-Johnson, C., "Tactics of sexual coercion : When men and women won’t take no for an answer" 40 (40): 76-86, 2003

26 Beres, M., "Sexual miscommunication? Untangling assumptions about sexual communication between casual sex partners" 12 (12): 1-14, 2010

27 Impett, E. A., "Sexual compliance : Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives" 40 (40): 87-100, 2003

28 Winslett, A. H., "Sexual boundaries : An examination of the importance of talking before touching" 14 (14): 542-562, 2008

29 Morokoff, P. J., "Sexual Assertiveness Scale(SAS)for women : Development and validation" 73 (73): 790-804, 1997

30 DeSouza, E. R., "Reactions to refusals of sexual advances among U. S. and Brazilian men and women" 34 : 549-565, 1996

31 Garcia, L. T., "Perceptions of resistance to unwanted sexual advances" 10 (10): 43-52, 1998

32 Rickert, V. I., "Is lack of sexual assertiveness among adolescent and young adult women a cause for concern?" 34 (34): 178-183, 2002

33 Katz, J., "Going along with it : Sexually coercive partner behavior predicts dating women’s compliance with unwanted sex" 16 (16): 730-742, 2010

34 O’Sullivan, L. F., "Feigning sexual desire : Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships" 35 (35): 234-243, 1998

35 Muehlenhard, C. L., "Examining stereotypes about token resistance to sex" 35 (35): 676-683, 2011

36 Muehlenhard, C. L., "Doble standard/double bind : The sexual double standard and women’s communication about sex" 15 (15): 447-461, 1991

37 Muehlenhard, C. L., "Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women’s token resistance to sex" 54 (54): 872-879, 1988

38 Emmers-Sommer, T. M., "Do men and women differ in their perceptions of women’s and men’s saying “no” when they mean “yes” to sex?: An examination between and within gender" 20 (20): 373-385, 2016

39 Buss, D. M., "Conflict between the sexes : Strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset" 56 : 734-747, 1989

40 McMahon, S., "An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths" 35 (35): 71-81, 2011

41 변혜정, "'성폭력' 피해 구성과 그 의미에 관한 연구 : 친밀한 이성애 관계에서 성(폭력) 경험에 대한 여성의 목소리를 중심으로" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2004