Lazy thinking, lazy giving? Examining the effects of Norwegian aid on forests in developing countries

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Norwegian government enthusiastically supports the protection of forests, which are important CO2 sinks. Given all the difficulty surrounding the reduction of greenhouse gases, funding the protection of forests is a sound proposition. Up to the present time, how well has Norwegian aid to forests and Norwegian bilateral aid affected the health of forests? Using World Bank data on forest degradation and change in forest area for roughly 130 developing countries from 1999 to 2013, we find that higher levels of Norwegian forest aid among recipient countries has generally had no effect on reducing degradation, while total Norwegian bilateral aid is associated with increased degradation, results that might very well be causal because they are robust to estimations using instrumental variable techniques. Two-step selection models show that forest aid also increases forest degradation, result that are quite unflattering of Norwegian aid. These results are robust to several alternative specifications of our models and to alternative estimation techniques including country fixed effects. Two clear lessons emerge from our findings; firstly, that Norwegian aid does not seem to be coordinated for addressing the problem of forest degradation; and secondly, aid as a means to solve the climate problem likely faces steep obstacles if even a non-strategic, aid-giving country, such as Norway, is capable of more harm than good.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 World Bank, "World Development Indicators, online data"

2 Eggen Ø, "Virker bistand? De ulikebidragene til de siste års bistandsdebatt" (66) : 209-222, 2008

3 Gurr TR, "Tracking democracy’s third wave with the Polity III data" 32 (32): 469-482, 1995

4 Easterly W, "The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good" Oxford University Press 2006

5 Maren M, "The Road to Hell: The Ravaging Effects of Foreign Aid and International Charity" The Free Press 1997

6 Hancock G, "The Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business" The Atlantic Monthly Press 1994

7 Sachs JD, "The End of Poverty. How Can We Make It Happen in Our Lifetime?" Penguin Books 2005

8 Bueno de Mesquita B, "The Dictator’s Handbook" Public Affairs 2012

9 Collier P, "The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are Failing and What Can Be Done About It" Oxford University Press 2007

10 Root H, "The Alliance Curse: How America Lost the Third World" Brookings 2008

11 Heckman J, "Sample selection bias as a specification error" 47 (47): 153-161, 1979

12 Easterly W, "Rhetoric vs. reality: The best and worst of aid agency practices" 39 (39): 1930-1949, 2011

13 Hajek F, "Regime-building for REDD+: Evidence from a cluster of local initiatives in south-eastern Peru" 14 (14): 201-215, 2011

14 Agarwal A, "Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation" 36 : 11-24, 2011

15 NORAD, "Real-time evaluation of Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative (NICFI)"

16 Glennie J, "Norway’s wise ways on aid"

17 Publisher Office of the Prime Minister, "Norway offers up to 1 billion to save the rainforest"

18 NORAD, "Norsk utviklingspolitikk"

19 Angrist JD, "Mostly Harmless Econometrics" Princeton University Press 2009

20 Gleditsch KS, "Measuring space: A minimum distance database" 38 (38): 739-758, 2001

21 Banerjee A, "Making Aid Work" MIT Press 2007

22 NORAD, "List of grant recipients Norad/NICFI grant scheme for civil society 2013–2015"

23 Achen CH, "Let´s Put the Garbage-Can Regressions and Garbage-Can Probits Where They Belong" 22 (22): 327-339, 2005

24 Tvedt T, "International development aid and its impact on a donor country: A case study of Norway" 19 (19): 614-645, 2007

25 Borchgrevink A(2004), "Images of Norwegian aid" 31 (31): 161-181, 2004

26 Jørgensen I, "Hvorfor snakker vi om skog hele tiden?"

27 FAO, "Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010: Main Report" Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations

28 Gates S, "Global Aid Allocation: Are Nordic Donors Different?" Centre for the Study of African Economies. University of Oxford 2004

29 Rudel TK, "Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change" 15 : 23-31, 2005

30 Van Soest D, "Foreign transfers and tropical deforestation: What terms of conditionality?" 82 (82): 389-399, 2000

31 Svensson J, "Foreign aid and Rent-seeking" 51 : 437-461, 2000

32 Combes Motel P, "Explorations in the environment – Development dilemma" 57 (57): 479-485, 2014

33 Barbier E, "Explaining forest transitions: The role of governance" 119 : 252-262, 2015

34 Wooldridge JM, "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data" MIT Press 2002

35 Riddel RC, "Does Foreign Aid Really Work?" Oxford University Press 2007

36 Midlarsky MI, "Democracy and the environment: An empirical assessment" 35 (35): 341-361, 1998

37 Moyo D, "Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working and How There is Another Way for Africa" Penguin 2009

38 Hermansen EAT, "Climate policy constraints and NGO entrepreneurship: The story of Norway’s leadership in REDD+ financing" Center for Global Development 2014

39 Karsenty A, "Can “fragile states” decide to reduce their deforestation? The inappropriate use of the theory of incentives with respect to the REDD mechanism" 18 : 38-45, 2012

40 NORAD, "Can we demonstrate the difference that Norwegian aid makes?" Evaluation department 2014

41 Eggen Ø, "Bistand som politisk markering. Universitetsforlaget" 71 (71): 421-429, 2013

42 Nickell N, "Biases in dynamics models with fixed effects" 49 (49): 1417-1426, 1981

43 Bratland KS, "Bevaring av regnskog gjennom bistand, en analyse av Norges bidrag til Amazonasfondet i Brasil" Norges Handelhøyskole 2011

44 Miljøverndepartementet, "Bakgrunns informasjon om Regjeringens klima-og skoginitiativ"

45 Chomitz KM, "At Loggerheads? Agricultural Expansion, Poverty Reduction, and Environment in the Tropical Forests" The World Bank 2007

46 Angelsen A, "Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices" Center for International Forestry Research 2012

47 Hirano Y, "Aid is good for the poor" World Bank Group 2014

48 Newey WK, "A simple, positive, semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix" 55 (55): 703-708, 1987

49 Wilson SE, "A lot more to do: The sensitivity of time-series cross-section analyses to simple alternative specifications" 15 (15): 101-123, 2007

50 Harvey F, "280m forests initiative launched at UN climate talks in Warsaw"