RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Middle Powers in Great Powers’ Grand Strategy: Korea’s Soft Hedging in the East Asian Security Structure

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104947015

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper attempts to find Korea’s foreign policy directives amid a constantly changing regional dynamic shaped by the United States and China (G-2). The future of the G-2 relationship is a decisive factor to the Korean Peninsula due to the structu...

      This paper attempts to find Korea’s foreign policy directives amid a constantly changing regional dynamic shaped by the United States and China (G-2). The future of the G-2 relationship is a decisive factor to the Korean Peninsula due to the structural influence and uncertainties it entails. When the two great powers’ grand strategies - strategy of primacy and neo-isolationism for the U.S., and strategy of status quo and revisionism for China –converge, a distinctive set of international order appears in the East Asian security structure. They are: hegemonic stability, power transition, concert of power, and balance-of-power. Although the four different security settings require Korea to adopt differing tactics, its broader strategic orientation should orient towards “soft hedging”, a strategic maneuver to maintain peaceful and strategic relations with both China and the U.S., while also broadly contributing to facilitating China’s integration into the American-led international system. Under the circumstances, Korea can play a pivotal role in East Asian international relations by effectively using its hard and soft power resources and legitimate status as a historical peace power. Furthermore, Korea can become an effective global player as an “interest mediator” between the developed and developing nations in the fields of non-traditional security issues such as environment, human security, international finance, free trade economy, human rights, and international development.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Organski, A. F. K., "World Politics" Knopf 1958

      2 Zhu, Zhiqin, "US-China Relations in the 21st Century: Power Transition and Peace" 57 : 2007

      3 Pew Research Center for the Press & the Press, "U.S. Seen as Less Important, China as More Powerful: Isolationist Sentiment Surges to Four-Decade High"

      4 Zhao Xiaozhuo, "Time to Rethink the Role of US Asia-Pacific Alliances"

      5 Bergsten, C. F., "The United States and the World Economy: Foreign Economic Policy for the Next Decade" Institute for International Economics 2005

      6 Mearsheimer, John J., "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" Norton 2001

      7 Goldstein, Avery, "The Rise of China, Power Transition and South Korea’s Soft Hedging, In Towards Pax Sinica? China's Rise and Transformation: Impacts and Implications" Institute of China Studies, University of Malaya 2009

      8 Choi, Woo-sun, "The Rise of China and US-Led Security Cooperation" IFANS 2011

      9 Pei, Minxin, "The Paradoxes of American Nationalism" 2003

      10 Kuik, Cheng-Chwee, "The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore's Response to a Rising China" 30 (30): 2008

      1 Organski, A. F. K., "World Politics" Knopf 1958

      2 Zhu, Zhiqin, "US-China Relations in the 21st Century: Power Transition and Peace" 57 : 2007

      3 Pew Research Center for the Press & the Press, "U.S. Seen as Less Important, China as More Powerful: Isolationist Sentiment Surges to Four-Decade High"

      4 Zhao Xiaozhuo, "Time to Rethink the Role of US Asia-Pacific Alliances"

      5 Bergsten, C. F., "The United States and the World Economy: Foreign Economic Policy for the Next Decade" Institute for International Economics 2005

      6 Mearsheimer, John J., "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" Norton 2001

      7 Goldstein, Avery, "The Rise of China, Power Transition and South Korea’s Soft Hedging, In Towards Pax Sinica? China's Rise and Transformation: Impacts and Implications" Institute of China Studies, University of Malaya 2009

      8 Choi, Woo-sun, "The Rise of China and US-Led Security Cooperation" IFANS 2011

      9 Pei, Minxin, "The Paradoxes of American Nationalism" 2003

      10 Kuik, Cheng-Chwee, "The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore's Response to a Rising China" 30 (30): 2008

      11 Joffe, Josef, "The Default Power: The False Prophecy of America’s Decline" 88 (88): 2009

      12 Tessman, Brock F., "System Structure and State Strategy: Adding Hedging to the Menu" 21 (21): 2012

      13 Medeiros, Evan, "Strategic Hedging and the Future of Asia-Pacific Stability" 29 (29): 2005

      14 한석희, "South Korea amid the United States and China after the Global Financial Crisis" 한국학술연구원 41 (41): 415-438, 2010

      15 Goldstein, Avery, "Rising to the Challenge: China's Grand Strategy and International Security" Stanford University Press 2005

      16 Walt, Stephen W., "Rethinking U.S. Grand Strategy: The Case for ‘Offshore Balancing’" Harvard Kennedy School 2009

      17 Atanassova-Cornelis, Elena, "Reshaping the East Asian Security Order: US-China Hedging and the EU's Strategic Choices" 10 : 2011

      18 Cohen. William S., "Report of the Quadrennial Defense Review" Department of Defense 1997

      19 Lemke, Douglas, "Power Transition Theory and the Rise of China" 29 : 2003

      20 Goh, Evelyn, "Meeting the China Challenge: The U.S. in Southeast Asian Regional Security Strategies" 2005

      21 Kim, Woo-sang, "Korea's National Strategy: Its Middle Power Diplomacy" Sechang Publisher 2012

      22 Nelson, Melvin Frederick, "Korea and the Old Orders in Eastern Asia" Russell & Russell 1945

      23 Bajoria, Jayshree, "Joint Challenges for U.S.-South Korea Alliance"

      24 Heginbotham, Eric, "Japan’s Dual Hedge" 81 (81): 2002

      25 Johnston, Alastair, "Is China a Status Quo Power?" 27 (27): 2003

      26 Feng, Huiyun, "Is China a Revisionist Power?" 2 (2): 2008

      27 Rosecrance, Richard N., "Improving U.S.-China Relations: The Next Steps"

      28 Chung, Jae Ho, "How America Views China-South Korea Bilateralism" 2003

      29 Layne, Christopher, "Graceful Decline"

      30 한석희, "From Engagement to Hedging: South Korea’s New China Policy" 한국국방연구원 20 (20): 335-351, 2008

      31 Lind, William S., "Don’t Break the China" The American Conservative 2013

      32 Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, "Diplomatic White Paper 2011" MOFAT 2011

      33 Gholz, Eugene, "Come Home, America: The Strategy of Restraint in the Face of Temptation" 21 (21): 1997

      34 Drezner, Daniel W., "China’s String of Fake Pearls"

      35 Wang, Jisi, "China’s Search for a Grand Strategy: A Rising Great Power Finds its Way" 2 : 2011

      36 Goldstein, Avery, "China’s Grand Strategy and U.S. Foreign Policy" Foreign Policy Research Institute 2005

      37 Swaine, Michael D., "China’s Assertive Behavior - Part Two: The Maritime Periphery" 35 : 2011

      38 Shirk, Susan, "China: Fragile Superpower" Oxford University Press 2008

      39 Chan, Steve, "China, the US and the Power-transition Theory" Routledge 2008

      40 Roy, Denny, "China's Reaction to American Predominance" 34 (34): 2003

      41 O’Rourke, Ronald, "China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities - Background and Issues for Congress" Congressional Research Service 2013

      42 Alagappa, Muthiah, "Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational Influences" Stanford University Press 1998

      43 Zhao, Quansheng, "America’s Response to the Rise of China and Sino-US Relations" 13 (13): 2005

      44 Walt, Stephen M., "American Primacy: Its Prospects and Pitfalls: Prominence of United States in Economic, International Affairs" 2002

      45 Pew Research Global Attitudes Project, "American Exceptionalism Subsides: The American-Western European Values Gap"

      46 Pew Research Global Attitudes Project, "American Character Gets Mixed Reviews: U.S. Image Up Slightly, But Still Negative"

      47 Kohut, Andrew, "America Against the World: How We Are Different and Why We Are Disliked" Henry Holt and Company 2006

      48 Zakaria, Fareed, "A ‘Hedge’ Strategy Toward China"

      49 Guo Xiaoqin, "A New-Type Sino-U.S. Great Power Relationship, Its Prospects (中美新型大国关系的构建路径放眼世界)" 2012

      50 Buzan, Barry, "A Leader without Followers the United States in World Politics After Bush" 5 : 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.47 0.47 0.4
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.37 0.39 0.574 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼