계몽기 연극개량론과 단재 신채호

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Articles below illustrate relevant facts about the theater reformation that took place in the early modern Korea.
A. Hwangsung Shinmoon, 1909.4.18 ? “Kyunggo Yulsah Kwanja(警告律社觀者)”
B. Hwangsung Shinmoon, 1909.4.30 ? “Sochik Yiha Yi Hyupryulsah Habul Hyukpah(詔勅已下而協律社何不革罷)”
C. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1908.7.8 ? “Keunkeum Kukmoon Soseol Jeoja Ui Juyi(近今國文小說著者의 注意)”
D. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1908.7.12 ? “Keukgyae Gaelyangnon(劇界改良論)”
E. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1908.11.8 ? “Yeonkeukgyae Ji Yi Yin-jik(演劇界之李人稙)”
F. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1909.11.9∼12.4 ? “Cheonheedangsihwa(天喜堂詩話)”
G. Daehan Maeil Shinbo, 1909.12.2 - “Soseolga Ui Chuse(小說家의 趨勢)”
The comment on theater reform is comprised of articles A and B and also constitutes theory proposed in C. Both C and D can be further explained through F, and F also has its influences on G in certain ways. The relationships between the seven written pieces of Danjae Shin Chae-ho can be illustrated as seen below:
1<SUP>st</SUP>: Details on a specific genre(A→B, D→E, C→G, “Non Hakkyoyong Gah(論學校用歌)”→F)
2<SUP>nd</SUP>: Concentration on a different genre(A?B+C→D, C+“Non Hakkyoyong Gah”+D→F, F→G)
Articles A and B, D and E, and C and G are parallel to each other in some aspects. Although it was not thus clearly indicated in the articles, “Non Hakkyoyong Gah” can be viewed as the basis of “Cheonheedangsihwa.” The importance of the link between the two articles is seen in works C and D. Both of these articles explain the reasons for such literary reformation that occurred in early modern literature of Korea.
In article A, the author gives a brief introduction to the readers and tries to persuade them to agree with his ideas on reformations in early modern Korea. The second article, B, consists of cynical criticism on producers: Kim Yong-jae, Choi Sang-don, and Goh Hee-joon. Article D displays the author’s generalized view on theater reform in Korea, while E is more specified and is able to give an outline of the whole process. Article D, in great detail, disproves writer Yi In-jik, therefore it proves to be a negative comment. C is a piece of work done on generalized perception on literary reform, and G is an overall summarization that is aimed towards “Hangangsun(漢江船).” Also, “Non Hakkyoyong Gah” mentioned earlier is included in the work “Cheonheedangsihwa.” As explained above, Danjae’s work on reformation in early modern Korea (C-literature, D,E- theater arts, F-poetry) covering different genres of art shows that his work is a broad observation of artistic movement in Korea. The articles also allow the readers to see the steady progress in which the literary reformation took place. A and B focus on reformation of theater arts, while C puts its emphasis on literary works and presents lyrics revision of “Non Hakkyoyong Gah.” Also, articles D and E continue to illustrate the progression in theater arts and through article F on poetry, the advanced development of liberal arts can be witnessed. The structure in which Danjae has followed while completing his work allows the readers to thoroughly observe each step of reformation that took place in early modern Korea. Danjae Shin Chae-ho’s work displayed his view on theater reform in early modern Korea. Through the writing style that was used by him in his articles, it was also possible to see that he had taken an active part in Hwangsung Shinmoon. Also, his plan for improvement in theater reform as well as for progression in Korean liberal arts allowed the readers to integrate all his articles to better understand the reformation directly.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 들어가는 말
• 2. 글의 내적 논리와 단재 사상
• 3. 연극개량론 형성의 전후
• 4. 마무리
• 참고문헌
• [Abstract]

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김주현, "신채호의 자료 발굴 및 원전확정 연구- <<대한매일신보>>를 중심으로" 한국현대문학회 (20) : 113-146, 2006

2 이상우, "근대계몽기의 연극개량론과 서사문학에 나타난 국민국가 인식" 민족어문학회 0 (0): 415-452, 2006

3 김주현, "국문 창제 요의설(了義說)을 통한 [천희당시화]의 저자 규명" 한국어문학회 (87) : 481-518, 2005

4 박정규, "국내에서의 신채호 연보와 쓴 글에 대한 고찰 in : 단재신채호연구의 재조명" 단재문화예술추진위원회 2006

5 권오만, "개화기시가연구" 새문사 1989

6 우수진, "개화기 연극개량의 국민화를 위한 감화기제 연구" 한국극예술학회 19 : 41-71, 2004

7 김재석, "개화기 연극 개량론의 성격" 경북대학교 인문과학연구소 37-58, 2001

8 김주현, "『황성신문』 논설과 단재 신채호" 한국어문학회 (101) : 359-391, 2008

9 임형택, "“담총”의 사상과 그 작자 in : 신채호의 사상과 민족독립운동" 형설출판사 1986

10 김주현, "[천희당시화]의 저자 확정 문제" 우리말글학회 33 : 271-306, 2005

11 강현조, "<귀의성> 판본 연구" 한국현대소설학회 (35) : 89-104, 2007