Similar Operative Outcomes between the da Vinci Xi® and da Vinci Si® Systems in Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The robotic system for surgery was introduced to gastric cancer surgery in the early 2000s to overcome the shortcomings of laparoscopic surgery. The more recently introduced da Vinci Xi® system offers benefits allowing four-quadrant access, greater range of motion, and easier docking through an overhead boom rotation with laser targeting. We aimed to identify whether the Xi® system provides actual advantages over the Si® system in gastrectomy for gastric cancer by comparing the operative outcomes.
Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent robotic gastrectomy as treatment for gastric cancer from March 2016 to March 2017. Patients' demographic data, perioperative information, and operative and pathological outcomes were collected and analyzed.
Results: A total of 109 patients were included in the Xi® group and 179 in the Si® group.
Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. The mean operative time was 229.9 minutes in the Xi® group and 223.7 minutes in the Si® group. The mean estimated blood loss was 72.7 mL in the Xi® group and 62.1 mL in the Si® group. No patient in the Xi® group was converted to open or laparoscopy, while 3 patients in the Si® group were converted, 2 to open surgery and 1 to laparoscopy, this difference was not statistically significant. Bowel function was resumed 3 days after surgery, while soft diet was initiated 4 days after surgery.
Conclusions: We found no difference in surgical outcomes after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer between the da Vinci Xi® and da Vinci Si® procedures.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Morelli L, "Use of the new da Vinci Xi® during robotic rectal resection for cancer: a pilot matched-case comparison with the da Vinci Si®" 13 : e1728-, 2017

2 Kim DH, "The settings, pros and cons of the new surgical robot da Vinci Xi system for transoral robotic surgery (TORS): a comparison with the popular da Vinci Si system" 26 : 391-396, 2016

3 Goonewardene SS, "The da Vinci Xi and robotic radical prostatectomy-an evolution in learning and technique" 11 : 111-113, 2017

4 Cho M, "Similar hematologic and nutritional outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer" 2018

5 Lee S, "Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial" 31 : 4002-4009, 2017

6 Song J, "Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases" 23 : 1204-1211, 2009

7 Shen W, "Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of short-term surgical outcomes" 30 : 574-580, 2016

8 Lim SH, "Robotic surgery for gastric tumor: current status and new approaches" 1 : 28-, 2016

9 Woo Y, "Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers" 146 : 1086-1092, 2011

10 Kim YM, "Robotic D2 lymph node dissection during distal subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: toward procedural standardization" 23 : 2409-2410, 2016

11 Morelli L, "Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si" 32 : 589-600, 2018

12 Song J, "Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures" 249 : 927-932, 2009

13 Seo WJ, "Reduced-port totally robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a modified technique using Single-Site® and two additional ports" 32 : 3713-3719, 2018

14 Kim HI, "Rapid and safe learning of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: multidimensional analysis in a comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy" 40 : 1346-1354, 2014

15 Protyniak B, "Multiquadrant robotic colorectal surgery: the da Vinci Xi vs Si comparison" 12 : 67-74, 2018

16 Kim HI, "Multicenter prospective comparative study of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma" 263 : 103-109, 2016

17 Yang K, "Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction by intracorporeal anastomosis with linear staplers" 222 : e39-e45, 2016

18 Ozben V, "Is da Vinci Xi better than da Vinci Si in robotic rectal cancer surgery? Comparison of the 2 generations of da Vinci systems" 26 : 417-423, 2016

19 Patel MN, "Does transition from the da Vinci Si to Xi robotic platform impact single-docking technique for robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy?" 116 : 990-994, 2015

20 Abdel Raheem A, "Da Vinci Xi and Si platforms have equivalent perioperative outcomes during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: preliminary experience" 11 : 53-61, 2017

21 Dindo D, "Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey" 240 : 205-213, 2004