RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Testing Cost Inefficiency under Free Entry in the Real Estate Brokerage Industry

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103181569

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this article we provide an empirical framework to study entry and cost inefficiency in the real estate brokerage industry. Building upon recent empirical work on games of incomplete information, we develop an equilibrium model that incorporates uni...

      In this article we provide an empirical framework to study entry and cost inefficiency in the real estate brokerage industry. Building upon recent empirical work on games of incomplete information, we develop an equilibrium model that incorporates unique features of this industry. Using individual-level data on entry and revenues, we estimate our entry model to recover the cost function. Based on estimated costs, we directly test for cost inefficiency due to free entry and find evidence for a loss of economies of scale and wasteful non-price competition. We further use the estimated model to evaluate welfare implications of prohibiting rebates on commissions. We find that rebate bans are welfare-reducing, not only because they discourage price competition, but also because they encourage excessive entry. In particular, removing these rebate bans would decrease the equilibrium number of realtors by 7.2% and reduce total variable costs by 4.1%.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1 Introduction
      • 2 Theory of Cost Inefficiency Under Free Entry
      • 3 EmpiricaⅠ Framework
      • 4 Data
      • 5 Results
      • 1 Introduction
      • 2 Theory of Cost Inefficiency Under Free Entry
      • 3 EmpiricaⅠ Framework
      • 4 Data
      • 5 Results
      • 6
      • Conclusion
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼