Usability Evaluation Scale for Product of Intelligent Homecare based on Retail Consumer

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The number intelligent homecare products are focused on the development of technology, resulting in a lack of realistic environments or requirements for consumers. The purpose of this paper is to define the consumer and context for intelligent homecare products and to develop a usability evaluation scale. Research design, data and methodology: For this study, first, consumer and contexts related to intelligent homecare products were analyzed through literature review. Second, the primary usability evaluation factors were derived for intelligent homecare products by collecting the factors related to usability evaluation and conducting in-depth interviews with experts. Third, the second usability evaluation factors were derived through survey and statistical analysis based on the derived usability evaluation factors. Results: As a result, users of intelligent homecare products were classified as primary users and secondary consumers and six related contexts. The usability evaluation scale was established with four factors – Functionality, Error, Convenience, and Emotion – and 13 items. Conclusions: This study can be the basis for developing and distributing products that meet the consumer environment and requirements related to intelligent homecare products that will contribute to securing the competitiveness of companies and developing the technology and service value of related industries.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 양회창, "전통시장 선택 속성이 관계품질에 미치는 영향 : 소비감정의 조절효과와 소비자 가치의 매개효과" 한국유통과학회 10 (10): 25-34, 2012

2 조인숙, "유비쿼터스 관광정보 서비스 속성에 대한 지각이 사용자 만족 및 행동의도에 미치는 영향 - 모바일 서비스를 중심으로 -" 대한경영학회 23 (23): 2149-2172, 2010

3 Sung-Ho Cho, "모바일 관광 앱 서비스특성이 지각된 가치, 만족 및 행동의도에 미치는 영향" 한국유통과학회 10 (10): 45-52, 2019

4 Escalas, J. E., "Understanding the effects of process-focused versus outcome-focused thought in response to advertising" 31 (31): 274-285, 2004

5 Ni, Q., "The Elderly’s Independent Living in Smart Homes : A Characterization of Activities and Sensing Infrastructure Survey to Facilitate Services Development" 15 (15): 11312-11362, 2015

6 Parasuraman, A., "Technology Readiness Index(TRI)a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies" 2 (2): 307-320, 2000

7 Fassnacht, M., "Quality of Electronic Services : Conceptualizing and Testing a Hierarchical Model" 9 (9): 19-37, 2006

8 진범석, "QFD를 이용한 식기세척기의 감성기반 사용성 평가 연구" 대한인간공학회 26 (26): 101-109, 2007

9 Sundaravadivel, P., "Everything You Wanted to Know about Smart Health Care : Evaluating the Different Technologies and Components of the Internet of Things for Better Health" 7 (7): 18-28, 2018

10 Han, S. H., "Evaluation of product usability : development and validation of usability dimensions and design elements based on empirical models" 26 (26): 477-488, 2000

11 Won-Jun Lee, "Evaluating Perceived Smartness of Product from Consumer’s Point of View: The Concept and Measurement" 한국유통과학회 6 (6): 149-158, 2019

12 Rauschenberger, M., "Efficient Measurement of the User Experience of Interactive Products" 2 (2): 39-45, 2013

13 Andre, T. S., "Determining the effectiveness of the usability problem inspector : a theory-based model and tool for finding usability problems" 45 (45): 455-482, 2003

14 Martins, A. I., "Definition and Validaton of the ICF – Usability Scale" 67 (67): 132-139, 2015

15 Mohammadi, M., "Deep Learning for IoT Big Data and Streaming Analytics" 20 (20): 2923-2960, 2018

16 Day, A. K., "Context-Aware Computing: The Cyber Desk Project" 51-54, 1998

17 Brown, P. J., "Context-Aware Applications : From the Laboratory to the Marketplace" 4 (4): 58-64, 1997

18 Greenberg, P., "CRM at the Speed of Light" Lycos Press 2001

19 Moreno, L. V., "Ambient Assisted Living and Enhanced Living Environments" 2016

20 Kwahk, J., "A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products" 33 (33): 419-431, 2002

21 Gomes, L., "A Residential House Comparative Case Study Using Market Available Smart Plugs and EnAPlugs with Shared Knowledge" 12 (12): 1647-1662, 2019

22 Dey, D. S., "A Conceptual Framework and a Toolkit for Supporting the Rapid Prototyping of Context-Aware Applications" 16 (16): 97-166, 2001