직무자율성과 급진적/점진적 창의성간의 관계: 팀 몰입의 조절효과에 관한 다수준 연구 = The Effects of Job Autonomy on Radical Creativity and Incremental Creativity: A Multilevel Study on the Moderating Effect of Team Commitment

국문 초록 (Abstract)

경영환경이 점차 불확실해지고 경쟁이 치열해 지면서, 조직 내 급진적 아이디어의 개발이 점차 강조되고 있다. 이에 단일한 창의성 개념에서 벗어나 급진적 창의성(radical creativity)과 점진적 창의성(incremental creativity)을 구분하여 연구할 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 개인의 직무자율성이 급진적 창의성, 점진적 창의성에 어떤 영향을 미치는지, 또한 팀수준에서의 팀몰입 정도가 그들의 관계를 어떻게 조절하는지를 살펴보고자 하였다. 연구를 위해 다양한 업종과 부서로부터 설문자료를 수집하였다. 먼저 확인적 요인분석 결과, 직무자율성, 급진적 창의성, 점진적 창의성이 서로 구별되는 개념임을 확인하였다. 개별 구성원들은 팀에 소속되어 있는 존재이므로, 위계적 선형모형(HLM: Hierarchical Linear Modeling)을 통해 개인수준과 팀수준 변수를 동시에 고려하는 다수준(multilevel) 분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과, 직무자율성은 급진적 창의성과 점진적 창의성 모두와 긍정적인 관계가 있었다. 팀수준의 팀몰입 정도는 직무자율성과 급진적 창의성간의 관계를 유의미하게 조절하는 효과가 있었다. 반면에 가설과는 달리, 팀몰입 정도가 직무자율성과 점진적 창의성간의 관계를 조절효과는 지지되지 않았다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 시사점, 한계와 향후 연구방향을 제시하였다. 본 연구를 통해, 팀 내에서 개인의 급진적 창의성이 잘 발휘되기 위해서는 직무자율성을 부여하는 노력을 더욱 장려할 필요가 있으며, 특히 팀 전체의 팀몰입 정도를 높일 필요가 있음을 알 수 있었다. 향후 급진적/점진적 창의성과 관련된 다양한 연구들이 진행되기를 기대한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As business environment becomes more uncertain and competitive, the development of radical ideas in organization becomes more emphasized, and the necessity of studying on creativity by differentiating between radical creativity and incremental creativity beyond a broad and unitary construct has been proposed. The purpose of this paper was to examine the effects of job autonomy on radical creativity and incremental creativity at individual level, and the moderating effect of team commitment at team-level to those relationship. For this study, survey- based data were collected from various industries and teams in Korea. At first, performing confirmatory factor analyses, we checked for construct independence and discriminant validity of job autonomy, radical creativity, and incremental creativity. Then, we performed multilevel analyses using HLM (Hierarchical Linear Model) considering individual level and team level simultaneously because each individual was nested in a team. The results showed that job autonomy was positively related to radical creativity and incremental creativity. In addition, team commitment at team-level significantly moderated the relationship between job autonomy and radical creativity. On the contrary to hypotheses, the moderating effects of team commitment on the relationship between job autonomy and incremental creativity was not supported. Finally, we discussed the implications and limitations of this study, and future research direction. Through the study results, we were able to ensure that job autonomy is to be more provided to facilitate individual radical creativity in team, and specifically team commitment is to be more promoted at team-level. We expect that various studies on radical/incremental creativity will be progressed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이덕로, "직무특성이 개인창의성에 미치는 영향: 선행적 행동의 매개효과를 중심으로" 한국경영학회 37 (37): 443-475, 2008

2 조윤형, "직무특성과 정서노동이 직무몰입과 혁신성향에 미치는 영향: 사회적 지원의 조절효과" 한국인사관리학회 35 (35): 1-37, 2011

3 김해룡, "직무자율성이 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 셀프리더십의 매개효과를 중심으로" 한국인사관리학회 35 (35): 199-229, 2011

4 고득영, "직무자율성과 혁신행동 간의 관계: 직무만족의 매개효과와 성격과 조직혁신풍토의 조절효과" 한국산업및조직심리학회 25 (25): 215-238, 2012

5 유봉호, "자기효능감과 자율성이 창업성공 가능성에 미치는 영향: 내재적 동기와 위험감수성의 매개역할을 중심으로" 한국중소기업학회 37 (37): 87-105, 2015

6 한봉주, "위계적 선형모형(HLM)을 이용한 조직의 조직문화가 구성원의 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향 분석: 분석수준별 접근방법의 비교를 중심으로" 한국인사관리학회 36 (36): 169-199, 2012

7 이준호, "연구개발팀의 다양성과 응집성이 팀 창의성에 미치는 영향: 창의적 역할모델로서 리더기능의 조절효과" 한국인사관리학회 35 (35): 171-197, 2011

8 유동희, "업무 신속성과 직무 성과 및 조직시민행동 간 관계: 협력적 팀 풍토의 조절효과를 중심으로" 한국중소기업학회 38 (38): 1-23, 2016

9 송상호, "기술혁신의 특성과 기업환경, 내부능력, 전략간의 상황론적 연구" 19 : 179-210, 1995

10 Tushman, M. L., "Winning through innovation" Harvard Business School Press 1997

11 Wang, A., "When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy" 31 (31): 106-121, 2010

12 Leonard, D., "When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Groups" Harvard Business School Press 1999

13 Shalley, C. E., "What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity" 15 (15): 33-53, 2004

14 Unsworth, K., "Unpacking creativity" 26 (26): 289-297, 2001

15 Woodman, R. W., "Toward a theory of organizational creativity" 18 (18): 293-321, 1993

16 Smith, K. G., "Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication" 39 (39): 412-438, 1994

17 Levinthal, D., "The myopia of learning" 14 (14): 95-112, 1993

18 Gupta, A. K., "The interplay between exploration and exploitation" 49 (49): 693-706, 2006

19 Christensen, C. M., "The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail" Harvard Business School Press 1998

20 Christensen, C. M., "The innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth" Harvard Business School Press 2003

21 Shalley, C. E., "The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?" 30 (30): 933-958, 2004

22 Bishop, J. W., "The differential effects of team commitment and organizational commitment on job performance and intention to quit" 1997

23 Dewar, R. D., "The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis" 32 (32): 1422-1433, 1986

24 Amabile, T. M., "The Social Psychology of Creativity" Springer-Verlag 1983

25 Kostopoulos, K. C., "Team Exploratory and Exploitative Learning: Psychological Safety, Task Conflict, and Team Performance" 36 (36): 385-415, 2011

26 Bishop, J. W., "Support, commitment, and employee outcomes in a team environment" 26 (26): 1113-1132, 2000

27 Gagne, M., "Self-determination theory and work motivation" 26 (26): 331-362, 2005

28 Deci, E. L., "Self-determination in a work organization" 74 (74): 580-590, 1989

29 Amabile, T. M., "Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 10" JAI Press 123-167, 1988

30 Grant, A. M., "Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.28" 3-34, 2008

31 Gilson, L. L., "Radical and Incremental Creativity: Antecedents and Processes" 5 (5): 21-28, 2011

32 Edmondson, A. C., "Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams" 44 (44): 350-383, 1999

33 Becker, T. E., "Profiles of commitment: An empirical test" 14 (14): 177-190, 1993

34 Porter, L. W., "Organizational commitment, job Satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians" 59 (59): 603-609, 1974

35 Podsakoff, P. M., "Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research" 26 (26): 513-563, 2000

36 De Lara, P. Z. M., "Organizational anomie as moderator of the relationship between an unfavorable attitudinal environment and citizenship behavior(OCB)-empirical study among university administration and services personnel" 36 (36): 843-846, 2007

37 Ettlie, J. E., "Organizational Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical vs Incremental Innovation" 30 (30): 682-695, 1984

38 Bandura, A., "Negative self-efficacy and Goal Effects Revisite" 88 (88): 87-99, 2003

39 Bliese, P. D., "Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations" Jossey-Bass 349-381, 2000

40 Snijders, T., "Multilevel Analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling" Sage Publications 1999

41 Ford, B., "Managing engineers effectively" 37 : 49-52, 1987

42 Van der Vegt, G. S., "Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification" 48 (48): 532-547, 2005

43 Eisenberger, R., "Learned industriousness" 99 (99): 248-267, 1992

44 West, M. A., "Leadership clarity and team innovation in health care" 14 (14): 393-410, 2003

45 Wrzesniewski, A., "Job Crafting and cultivating positive meaning and identity in work" 1 : 281-302, 2013

46 Kreft, I., "Introducing Multilevel Modeling" Sage Publications 1998

47 West, M. A., "Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies" Wiley 1990

48 King, N., "Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies" Wiley 81-100, 1990

49 Nord, W. R., "Implementing routine and radical innovations" Lexington Books 1987

50 Carmeli, A., "Highquality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations" 30 (30): 709-729, 2009

51 Bryk, A. S., "Hierarchical linear models" Sage 1992

52 Janis, I., "Groupthink" Houghton Mifflin 1982

53 Chan, D., "Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different level of analysis: A typology of composition model" 83 (83): 234-246, 1998

54 Parker, S. K., "From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy" 49 (49): 447-469, 2000

55 Zhou, J., "Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects of creative performance" 83 (83): 261-276, 1998

56 Madjar, N., "Factors for Radical Creativity, Incremental Creativity, and Routine, Noncreative Performance" 96 (96): 730-743, 2011

57 Benner, M. J., "Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited" 28 (28): 238-256, 2003

58 March, J. G., "Exploitation and exploration in organizational learning" 2 (2): 71-87, 1991

59 James, L. R., "Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias" 69 (69): 85-98, 1984

60 Oldham, G. R., "Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work" 39 (39): 607-634, 1996

61 Bishop, J. W., "Employee commitment and work team productivity" 11 : 107-111, 1997

62 Cronin, M. A., "Dynamics in Groups: Are We There Yet?" 5 (5): 571-612, 2011

63 Markides, C., "Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory" 23 (23): 19-25, 2006

64 Hackman, J. R., "Development of the job diagnostic survey" 60 (60): 159-170, 1975

65 Mumford, M. D., "Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation" 103 (103): 27-43, 1988

66 Amabile, T. M., "Creativity in context" Westview Press 1996

67 Wrzesniewski, A., "Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work" 26 (26): 179-201, 2001

68 Ziebro, M., "Connecting the dots: Network development, information flow, and creativity in groups" 12 : 135-162, 2009

69 Hofmann, D. A., "An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models" 23 (23): 723-744, 1997

70 Bishop, J. W., "An Examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment" 85 (85): 439-450, 2000

71 Rhoades, L., "Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support" 86 (86): 825-836, 2001

72 Vandenberghe, C., "Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes" 64 (64): 47-71, 2004

73 Sternberg, R. J., "A propulsion model of types of creative contributions" 3 (3): 83-100, 1999

74 Organ, D. W., "A metaanalytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior" 48 (48): 775-802, 1995

75 Hirst, G., "A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity" 52 (52): 280-293, 2009