중국 데이터 요소 정책에 따른 개인정보 보호법의 입법 동향 = Legislative Trends in the Personal Information Protection Act according to China s Data Element Policy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There is a certain conflict and contradiction between the flow of data and the protection of personal information, which mainly reflects the trade-off between the efficiency of data sharing and the protection of personal information. The protection of personal rights, such as personal privacy and personal information, depends on the institutional design aspect. If you encourage the sharing of data, it may affect the protection of personal information, and, on the contrary, protect personal information and data rights excessively and strictly restricting the flow of the data will hinder economic development. Globally, how to properly coordinate and handle the relationship between the two is a common challenge facing legal systems in many countries. In general, the EU places more emphasis on privacy, and US law is paying more attention to the use of personal information to strengthen its dominance in the data industry. However, the general trend of the two legal systems in the process of driving the digital economy is that they are more concerned with the protection of privacy rights. In most cases, the privacy-exchange behavior for efficiency helps promote the development of digital transactions because individuals can approve their use of data, allowing data-driven companies to collect, store and use personal information. However, the continued leakage of personal information from data-driven companies reflects the seriousness of the problem. Therefore, in order to promote the flow of information data, personal information must be protected. The digital factor policy presents new development concepts and requirements to promote digital transactions and enhance privacy. The development of data transactions must find a balance between the two. Only when this balance is achieved, the companies can properly conduct business activities using normally collected data, and also protects users personal information from being leaked and protects their rights when their legitimate rights are violated. This balance must be realized concretely by self-training of the state and corporations and individual participation. The “quantum balance” legislative model based on the legislative direction for “multiple co-development” has a clear institutional advantage, which allows for the integration of existing laws and the comprehensive protection of personal privacy according to China s national situation.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가며 Ⅱ. 데이터 거래에서의 프라이버시 문제 Ⅲ. 데이터 거래에서의 개인정보 보호에 대한 입법적 대응 Ⅳ. 데이터 거래의 촉진 및 프라이버시 보호의 균형적 경로 Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한국조사연구학회, "빅 데이터 활용 통계생산방법론 연구용역 결과보고서" 2016

2 김성천, "미국캘리포니아주 소비자프라이버시법의 주요내용과 시사점" 한국소지바원 (93) : 2018

3 王立志, "隐私权之定义是否可能" 上海社会科学院法学研究所 (8) : 2015

4 刘维, "跨境数据流动监管措施在GATS下的合规性分析" 湖北省社会科学界联合会 (3) : 2018

5 张彤, "论民法典编纂视角下的个人信息保护立法" 中共中央党校 (2) : 2020

6 戴龙, "论数字贸易背景下的个人隐私权保护" 吉林大学 (1) : 2020

7 田野, "论敏感个人信息的法律保护" 河南省社会科学界联合会 (07) : 2019

8 程啸, "论大数据时代的个人数据权利" 中国社会科学院 (3) : 2018

9 王利明, "论个人信息权的法律保护"以个人信息权与隐私权的界分为中心" 西南政法大学 2013

10 E.博登海默, "法理学-法律哲学与法律方法" 中国政法大学出版社 1999

11 沈春耀, "民法典编纂迈出第二步分编草案六编1034条提请审议"

12 程啸, "民法典编纂视野下的个人信息保护" 中国社会科学院法学研究所 (4) : 2019

13 金晶, "欧盟<一般数据保护条例>：演进, 要点与疑义" 中国社会科学院欧洲研究所 (4) : 2018

14 解正山, "数据驱动时代的数据隐私保护"从个人控制到数据控制者信义义务" 中南财经政法大学 (2) : 2020

15 王利明, "数据共享与个人信息保护" 西南政法大学 2019

16 张新宝, "我国个人信息保护法立法主要矛盾研讨" 中国社会科学院法学研究所 2018

17 徐明, "大数据时代的隐私危机及其侵权法应对" 中国社会科学院法学研究所 (1) : 2017

18 涂子沛, "大数据" 广西师范大学出版社 56-, 2012

19 孙宪忠, "关于尽快制定我国《个人信息保护法》的建议, 中国法律评论"

20 孙宪忠, "关于尽快制定我国<个人信息保护法>的建议"

21 李建国, "关于《中华人民共和国民法总则（草案）》的说明"

22 张新宝, "从隐私到个人信息：利益再衡量的理论与制度安排" 中国政法大学 (3) : 2015

23 张礼洪, "人格权的民法保护及其理论的历史发展-兼议我国的立法模式选择" (4) : 2018

24 杨立新, "人格权法" 法律出版社 2011

25 李彦宏, "中国用户很多时候愿意用隐私来换便捷服务"

26 何渊, "中国数据立法, 该参考欧盟模式还是美国模式?"

27 赵旭东, "中华人民共和国电子商务法释义与原理" 中国法制出版社 2018

28 龙卫球, "中华人民共和国民法总则释义与适用指导" 中国法制出版社 2017

29 王利明, "中华人民共和国民法总则详解 （上）" 中国法制出版社 2017

30 谢远扬, "个人信息的私法保护" 中国法制出版社 2016

31 叶名怡, "个人信息的侵权法保护" 中国社会科学院法学研究所 (4) : 2018

32 高富平, "个人信息保护 : 从个人控制到社会控制" 中国社科院法学研究所 (3) : 2018

33 Paul M. Schwartz, "Transatlantic Data Privacy Law" 106 (106): 2017

34 "Regulation(EU) 2018/1807 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on a Framework of the Free Flow of Non-Personal Data in the European Union"

35 European Commission, "Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data" 2012

36 Emilio Longoria, "Invisible, but Not Transparent：An Analysis of the Date Privacy Issues that could be Implicated by the Widespread Use of Connected Vehicles" 28 : 2017

37 Daniel J. Solove, "Introduction：Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma" 126 : 2013

38 Paul M. Schwartz, "Internet Privacy and the State" 32 (32): 2000

39 "General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR)"

40 "GDPR：Google and Facebook face up to $9.3B in fines on first day of new privacy law"

41 USITC, "Digital Trade in the U.S. and Global Economies, Part 1" USITC Publication 2013

42 Executive Office of the President, "Designing a Digital Future：Federally Funded Research and Development in Networking and Information Technology" 2010

43 "CCPA - Civil Code 캘리포니아 주법"

44 Joseph W. Jerome, "Buying and Selling Privacy Big Data’s Different Burdens and Benefits" 66 (66): 2013

45 Hogan Lovells, "Asia Pacific Data Protection and Cyber Security Guide"

46 Pierluigi Perri, "Ancient Worries and Modern Fears：Different Roots and Common Effects of U.S. and E.U. Privacy Regulation" 49 : 2017

47 "AB-874 California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018"

48 "AB-1335 Building Homes and Jobs Act"

49 叶金强, "<民法总则>"民事权利章"的得与失" (3) : 2017