Introduction of the Saiban-in System and Reformation of Criminal Procedure in Japan = Introduction of the Saiban-in System and Reformation of Criminal Procedure in Japan

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In 2004, Japan enacted a statute (the Saiban-in Act) to introduce a system of lay participation in criminal trials. In the new system, six people selected randomly from among the citizens in each case would serve as Saiban-in (lay assessor) and, in collaboration with three professional judges, engage themselves in deciding both guilt and sentence in the trials involving capital and other serious offenses.1) After five years of preparation, the Saiban-in Act came into force on May 21, 2009. In the four years and eight months since the first Sainban-in trial was held in August that year, 6,530 defendants were tried by the mixed panel courts, in which 36,837 citizens served as Saiban-in and 12,597 as supplementary Saiban-in.2) The introduction of this new system, which almost necessarily accompanied several important revisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP), has already led to not only dramatic changes in the management and manner of criminal trials but also significant developments in judicial precedents. It also seems to have been changing the attitudes of criminal justice professionals and even the public views on criminal law and justice in the long run. In the following parts, I will give a brief survey on the backgrounds of the introduction of the Saiban-in system and the ongoing reform which it has brought about in the Japanese criminal procedure.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Takesaki, Hironobu, "Words for New Year" SAIBANSHO JIHO (1545) : 1 ~, 2012

2 MARUTA, TAKASHI, "Thinking about a Jury Trial" 1990

3 Tsuji, Hiroyuki, "The Saiban-in Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure" 2005

4 The Justice System Reform Council, "The Points at Issue in the Justice System Reform" 1999

5 MITANI, TAICHIRO, "The Jury System as a Political Institution" 2013

6 ( Inouye Masahito ), "The Course of Things up to the Introduction of the Saiban-in System and Its Outlines" JURIST (1279) : 74 ~, 2004

7 Hirano, Ryuichi, "Talking about the Citizens’ Participation in the Justice System" HO NO SHIHAI 87 : 38 ~, 1992

8 General Secretariat of the Supreme Court of Japan, "Survey on Public Awareness concerning the Operation of the Saiban-in System" 2013

9 Council on Legislation, "Special Division on the Criminal Justice System in New Era" Basic Designs for a New Criminal Justice System Conformable to the Contemporary Situation 29, 2013

10 General Secretariat of the Supreme Court of Japan, "Seido-Shiko kara Heisei 25 Nen 12 Gatsu-matsu (Enforcement Situation of the Saiban-in System until the end of December 2013" 2013

11 Jissi Jokyo, "Secretariat of the Justice System Reform Council, The Jury Trials Formerly Enforced in Japan)" Material, 2000

12 Toshitani, Nobuyoshi, "SENGO KAIKAKU Vol. 4" University of Tokyo Institute of Social Sciences, 1975

13 Doi, Masakazu, "Ruling System in Transformation : 241 ~" 2007

14 SAEKI, CHIHIRO, "Resurrection of Jury Trials" 1996

15 General Secretariat of the Supreme Court of Japan, "Report of the Survey on Public Awareness concerning the Saiban-in System" 2008

16 General Secretariat of the Supreme Court of Japan, "Report of the Examination on the Enforcement Situation of Saiban-in Trials" 2012

17 The Justice System Reform Council, "Recommendations of the Justice System Reform Council: For a Justice System to Support Japan in the 21st Century" 2001

18 ( Inouye Masahito ), "Proposals to Improve Criminal Trial Proceedings" SHIHO-KENSHUSHO RONSHU 85 : 93 ~, 1991

19 Japan Federation of Bar Associations, "Proposals for the Purpose of Realizing a Jury System" 2000

20 Okahara, Masao, "On “the Act concerning the Suspension of the Jury Act”" HOSOKAI ZASSI 21 (4) : 16 ~, 1943

21 Council on Legislation, "On How the Sentencing Deliberation in Saiban-in Trials Should Be" 2012

22 KANEKO, HAJIME, "New Constitution and the Justice System" 1948

23 Jury, "Mixed Panel Court or Professional Judges (2) From the Viewpoint of a Mixed Panel Court System Supporter" KEIHO ZASSI 39 (1) : 30 ~, 1999

24 Jury, "Mixed Panel Court or Professional Judges (1) From the Viewpoint of a Jury System Supporter" KEIHO ZASSI 39 (1) : 18 ~, 1999

25 Tatsuoka, Sukeaki, "How the Appellate Review on the Saiban-in Trial Court’s Judgment Should Be" RONKYU JURIST (2) : 77 ~, 2012

26 MATSUO, KOYA, "Horizon of Criminal Law Jurisprudence" 2006

27 Hirano, Ryuichi, "Essays in Celebration for the 70th Anniversary of the Birth of Justice Shigemitsu Dando, Vol. 4 : 407 ~" 1985

28 Okubo, Taro, "Criticizm Against the Saiban-in System: a Sequel" HANREI JIHO (1172) : 3 ~, 2002

29 NISHINO, KIICHI, "Criticism Against the Saiban-in System" 2008

30 MATSUO, KOYA, "Criminal Trials and Citizens’ Participation" HOSO JIHO 60 (9) : 2673 ~, 2008

31 Kojo, Toshimaro, "Constitutionality of the Saiban-in System" GENDAI KEIJI-HO 6 (5) : 24 ~, 2004

32 KYOKAI, HOGAKU, "Commentaries on the Constitution of Japan" 1953

33 ( Inouye Masahito ), "Commentaries on the Chairperson’s Tentative Draft “the Outlines of a Thinkable Saiban-in System" 2003

34 Tsuji, Hiroyuki, "Commentaries on the Act for Revising Several Parts of the Code of Criminal Procedure" HOSO JIHO 57 (8) : 2299 ~, 2005

35 ( Inouye Masahito ), "Collected Legislative Materials of the Criminal Procedure Laws" Code of Criminal Procedure of 1948 2, 2007

36 AOKI, EIGORO, "BAISHIN SAIBAN" Jury Trial, 1981

37 Ministry of Justice Deliberation Committee on the Saiban-in System, "A Summary Report" 2013

38 Aoyagi, Fumio, "A Study on the Jury System and the Mixed Panel Court System" JOCHI HOGAKU RONSHU 4 (1) : 27 ~, 1960

39 Hirano, Ryuichi, "A Proposal for the Adoption of a Mixed Panel Court System" JURIST (1189) : 50 ~, 2000