RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      영국 공공기록물 선별체계의 역사적 흐름과 의미 = Historical Transition in the Public Records Selection System and Its Meaning in Britain

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103026797

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It is well known that about 3% of public records is generally selected to hold a historical value, and transferred to archives. This archival selection process forms an inextricable connection with the interpretation of history. With the research on t...

      It is well known that about 3% of public records is generally selected to hold a historical value, and transferred to archives. This archival selection process forms an inextricable connection with the interpretation of history. With the research on transitions in the public records selection system in Britain, this paper aims to approach the relation between archival science and history from a new viewpoint.
      It was the responsibility of public bodies to identify those records of historical value. Though the archivists would play key roles in selecting archives over time, administrators had the advantage of having been familiar with the content and context of records. With Sir H. Jenkinson’s spirited defense, archives was regarded as legal evidence of what happened in the past. And after the Grigg system, archives selected by administrators were transferred to the archives for the historical research.
      With the new appraisal system of electronic records era, departments should aim to appraise record value through the functional analysis as early as possible, even before record creation. The operational process of embedding appraisal also needs involvement from other stake-holders and the public. On the other hand, unfamiliar terminology and professionalism of electronic records management can function also in negative way to disturb the participation of them. Historians need to take part in archival appraisal process in conscious and organised way, which could be another field of activism for history education.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 들어가며
      • 2. 19세기의 보존기록 선별 체계
      • 3. 젠킨슨의 기록 생산자 선별론
      • 4. 그리그 시스템과 새로운 변화
      • 5. 맺음말
      • 1. 들어가며
      • 2. 19세기의 보존기록 선별 체계
      • 3. 젠킨슨의 기록 생산자 선별론
      • 4. 그리그 시스템과 새로운 변화
      • 5. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 오항녕, "역사교육의 또 다른 지평, ‘아카이브’" 역사교육연구회 (101) : 297-327, 2007

      2 Cook, Terry., "‘We Are What We Keep: We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future" 32 (32): 2011

      3 Stamp, A. E., "The Public Record Office and the Historical Student: A Retrospect" 11 : 1928

      4 Levine, Philippa., "The Public Record Office and Its Staff, 1838-1886" 101 (101): 1986

      5 Michael, R., "The King’s Library of Manuscripts: The State Paper Office as Archive and Library" 48 (48): 2013

      6 Beckham, E. Jessie., "The British Historical Manuscripts Commission" 7 (7): 1944

      7 Honer E., "Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation" 11 : 2001

      8 Leahy, E. J., "Reduction of Public Records" 3 (3): 1940

      9 Rasmussen, C. Hans, "Records Management and the Decline of the English Archival Establishment, 1949–1956" 45 (45): 2010

      10 Wilson, Duncan, "Public Records: The Wilson Report and the White Paper" 25 (25): 1982

      1 오항녕, "역사교육의 또 다른 지평, ‘아카이브’" 역사교육연구회 (101) : 297-327, 2007

      2 Cook, Terry., "‘We Are What We Keep: We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future" 32 (32): 2011

      3 Stamp, A. E., "The Public Record Office and the Historical Student: A Retrospect" 11 : 1928

      4 Levine, Philippa., "The Public Record Office and Its Staff, 1838-1886" 101 (101): 1986

      5 Michael, R., "The King’s Library of Manuscripts: The State Paper Office as Archive and Library" 48 (48): 2013

      6 Beckham, E. Jessie., "The British Historical Manuscripts Commission" 7 (7): 1944

      7 Honer E., "Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation" 11 : 2001

      8 Leahy, E. J., "Reduction of Public Records" 3 (3): 1940

      9 Rasmussen, C. Hans, "Records Management and the Decline of the English Archival Establishment, 1949–1956" 45 (45): 2010

      10 Wilson, Duncan, "Public Records: The Wilson Report and the White Paper" 25 (25): 1982

      11 Nicholas, H. G., "Public Records: The Historian, the National Interest and Official Policy" 20 (20): 1964

      12 Schellenberg, T. R., "Modern Archives" The University of Chicago Press 1956

      13 Kolsrud, Ole., "Evolution of Basic Appraisal Principles" 55 (55): 1992

      14 Shepherd, E., "Archives and Archivists in 20th Century England" Ashgate 2009

      15 Jenkinson, H., "A Manual of Archive Administration: Including the Problem of War Archives and Archive Making" The Clarendon Press 1922

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1 1 0.94
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.94 0.96 1.598 0.59
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼