형법 제3조의 문제점과 해결방안 = The Problems and Solutions of Article 3 of the Criminal Act

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Article 3 of the Criminal Act provides that, "This Act shall apply to all Korean nationals who commit crimes outside the territory of the Republic of Korea," even though their crimes are not applied to the Criminal Act of the countries. However, the attitude of the current Act is inappropriate because policies and institutions of each country havebeen changed similarly through increasing co-relationships due to globalization. Also, the attitude of extending the territory to a host country is hard to defend against criticisms that protecting nationalism does not follow generation changes, though it is enough to keep protective values if each country has them traditionally. In addition, its provision is inappropriate to the constitutional ideology and rule under which a country should provide maximum fundamental rights for citizens while limiting them to the minimum if necessary. Therefore, Article 3 of the Criminal Act, "Crimes by Koreans outside Korea," should be revised because of the absolute personal principle. Direction for revision consists of the legislative method of the dual criminality punishment and positive system. By means of accepting the positive system, it is reasonablethat specific acts which are kept should be regulated by law somewhere outside of a host country. It is natural only if there is a social consensus on what kinds of crimes are enacted and legislated. As a result, the applicable scope of the Article 3 of the Criminal Act should be decreased. It is more rational that the solution is an analogical application with respect to the exceptive clause of Article 6 of the Criminal Act. Article 6 of the Criminal Act, "Foreign Crimes against Republic of Korea and Korean National outside Korea," provides that, "This Act shall apply to aliens who commit crimes, other than those specified in the preceding Article, against the Republic of Korea or her nationals outside the territory ofthe Republic of Korea provided.That this shall not apply in case where such acts under Act in effect at the time of the act do not constitute a crime, or the prosecution thereof or the execution of the punishment thereof or is remitted." Thus, it does not violate the principle of legality (nulla poena sine lege), if the exceptive clause of Article 6 of the Criminal Act is applied analogically thereof and gives actors a beneficial status, the applicable direction allows the decrease of unconstitutionality of the absolute personal principle which is related to "Crimes by Koreans outside Korea" in case that such acts do not constitute a crime, or the prosecution, or the execution of the punishment under the Act of the territory. Under this method, it is reasonable to apply to Article 3 of the Criminal Act toward providing actors with a beneficial status in the circumstance when it is not reformed.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말
• Ⅱ. 형법 제3조 속인주의의 타당성
• Ⅲ. 문제점
• Ⅳ. 현행 형사법내에서 해결방안
• Ⅴ. 입법적 해결방안
• Ⅵ. 맺는말
• [참고문헌]
• [Abstract]

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 유기천, "형법학(형법강의)" 일조각 1978

2 배종대, "형법총론(제9개정판)" 홍문사 2009

3 진계호, "형법총론(제8판)" 대왕사 2007

4 박상기, "형법총론(제8판)" 박영사 2009

5 이재상, "형법총론(제7판)" 박영사 2011

6 정성근, "형법총론(제5판)" 삼지원 2011

7 김성천, "형법총론(제4판)" 삼양애드 2008

8 이형국, "형법총론(제4판)" 법문사 2007

9 정영일, "형법총론(제3판)" 박영사 2010

10 임웅, "형법총론(제3정판 보정)" 법문사 2011

11 성낙현, "형법총론(제2판)" 동방문화사 2011

12 오영근, "형법총론(제2판)" 박영사 2010

13 김성돈, "형법총론(제2판)" 성균관대학교 출판부 2009

14 손동권, "형법총론(제2개정판)" 율곡출판사 2005

15 김일수, "형법총론(제11판)" 박영사 2007

16 신동운, "형법총론 제4판" 법문사 2009

17 이정원, "형법총론" 법지사 1999

18 김성규, "형법의 장소적 적용범위에 관한 규정의 내용과 한계" 한국형사법학회 (18) : 181-210, 2002

19 박상기, "형법각론(제8판)" 박영사 2011

20 김일수, "형법각론(제7판)" 박영사 2007

21 이재상, "형법각론(제7판)" 박영사 2010

22 이정원, "형법각론(제3판)" 법지사 2003

23 임웅, "형법각론(제3정판 보정)" 법문사 2011

24 김성돈, "형법각론(제2판)" 성균관대학교 출판부 2009

25 정성근, "형법각론(제2판)" 삼지원 2006

26 김성천, "형법각론(제2판)" 동현출판사 2006

27 손동권, "형법각론(제2개정판)" 율곡출판사 2007

28 이형국, "형법각론" 법문사 2007

29 오영근, "형법각론" 박영사 2005

30 전지연, "형법 제3조의 적극적 속인주의의 문제점과 해결방안" 법학연구원 19 (19): 107-129, 2009

31 김일수, "한국형법Ⅰ(총론상), In 개정판" 박영사 1996

32 김성규, "적극적 속인주의에 관한 형법 제3조의 문제점과 그 해결방안" 한국비교형사법학회 9 (9): 1-24, 2007

33 김성돈, "속인주의와 형법제3조의 재음미" 법학연구소 17 (17): 347-370, 2005

34 김성규, "소극적 속인주의에 대한 제한으로서의 쌍방가벌성의 요건 - 그 문제점과 대안*" 법학연구소 21 (21): 27-45, 2009

35 김재윤, "새로운 형법총론" 율곡출판사 2011

36 박병도, "국내법원에서 국제범죄의 소추와 처벌" 중앙법학회 8 (8): 357-386, 2006

37 林武永, "賭博罪에 있어서 內國人의 國外犯 處罰에 對한 妥當性 檢討" 한국법학원 72 : 245-256, 2003