RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      머신러닝 기법을 활용한 유황별 LOADEST 모형의 적정 회귀식 선정 연구: 낙동강 수계를 중심으로 = Study of Selection of Regression Equation for Flow-conditions using Machine-learning Method: Focusing on Nakdonggang Waterbody

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103367292

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study is to determine the coefficients of regression equations and to select the optimal regression equation in the LOADEST model after classifying the whole study period into 5 flow conditions for 16 watersheds located in the Nakdonggang waterbo...

      This study is to determine the coefficients of regression equations and to select the optimal regression equation in the LOADEST model after classifying the whole study period into 5 flow conditions for 16 watersheds located in the Nakdonggang waterbody. The optimized coefficients of regression equations were derived using the gradient descent method as a learning method in Tensorflow which is the engine of machine-learning method. In South Korea, the variability of streamflow is relatively high, and rainfall is concentrated in summer that can significantly affect the characteristic analysis of pollutant loads. Thus, unlike the previous application of the LOADEST model (adjusting whole study period), the study period was classified into 5 flow conditions to estimate the optimized coefficients and regression equations in the LOADEST model. As shown in the results, the equation #9 which has 7 coefficients related to flow and seasonal characteristics was selected for each flow condition in the study watersheds. When compared the simulated load (SS) to observed load, the simulation showed a similar pattern to the observation for the high flow condition due to the flow parameters related to precipitation directly. On the other hand, although the simulated load showed a similar pattern to observation in several watersheds, most of study watersheds showed large differences for the low flow conditions. This is because the pollutant load during low flow conditions might be significantly affected by baseflow or point-source pollutant load. Thus, based on the results of this study, it can be found that to estimate the continuous pollutant load properly the regression equations need to be determined with proper coefficients based on various flow conditions in watersheds. Furthermore, the machine-learning method can be useful to estimate the coefficients of regression equations in the LOADEST model.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박윤식, "한강수계에서의 부유사 예측을 위한 LOADEST 모형의 회귀식의 평가" 한국농공학회 57 (57): 37-45, 2015

      2 김상단, "유역모형 구축을 위한 8일간격 유량측정자료의 일유량 확장 가능성" 한국물환경학회 23 (23): 64-71, 2007

      3 이재운, "낙동강수계 권역별 비점오염원 오염도 평가" 한국환경영향평가학회 23 (23): 393-405, 2014

      4 Ramanarayanan, T. S., "Using APEX to identify alternative practices for animal waste management" 97-2209, 1997

      5 Park, Y. S., "Use of pollutant load regression models with various sampling frequencies for annual load estimation" 6 : 1685-1697, 2014

      6 Runkel, R. L., "U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods Book 4" 69-, 2004

      7 Ministry of Environment, "Total Maximum Daily Loads Handbook" Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Environment (ME) 1-69, 2004

      8 Oh, J., "The role of retrospective weather forecasts in developing daily forecasts of nutrient loadings over the Southeast US" 10 : 15625-15657, 2013

      9 National Institute of Environment Research, "The Study on the Optimum Assessment Methods for Achievement of Target Water Quality and Estimation of Allocation Loads Using a Dynamic Model" National Institute of Environment Research 1-31, 2013

      10 Jha, B., "Rating Curve Estimation of Surface Water Quality Data Using LOADEST" 4 : 849-856, 2013

      1 박윤식, "한강수계에서의 부유사 예측을 위한 LOADEST 모형의 회귀식의 평가" 한국농공학회 57 (57): 37-45, 2015

      2 김상단, "유역모형 구축을 위한 8일간격 유량측정자료의 일유량 확장 가능성" 한국물환경학회 23 (23): 64-71, 2007

      3 이재운, "낙동강수계 권역별 비점오염원 오염도 평가" 한국환경영향평가학회 23 (23): 393-405, 2014

      4 Ramanarayanan, T. S., "Using APEX to identify alternative practices for animal waste management" 97-2209, 1997

      5 Park, Y. S., "Use of pollutant load regression models with various sampling frequencies for annual load estimation" 6 : 1685-1697, 2014

      6 Runkel, R. L., "U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods Book 4" 69-, 2004

      7 Ministry of Environment, "Total Maximum Daily Loads Handbook" Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Environment (ME) 1-69, 2004

      8 Oh, J., "The role of retrospective weather forecasts in developing daily forecasts of nutrient loadings over the Southeast US" 10 : 15625-15657, 2013

      9 National Institute of Environment Research, "The Study on the Optimum Assessment Methods for Achievement of Target Water Quality and Estimation of Allocation Loads Using a Dynamic Model" National Institute of Environment Research 1-31, 2013

      10 Jha, B., "Rating Curve Estimation of Surface Water Quality Data Using LOADEST" 4 : 849-856, 2013

      11 Marcin Andrychowicz, "Learning to learn by gradient descent" 2016

      12 Dean, J., "Large scale distributed deep networks" 1232-1240, 2012

      13 Arnold, J. G., "Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment – Part 1:Model development" 34 (34): 73-89, 1998

      14 Haith, D. A., "GWLF, generalized watershed loading functions, version 2.0, user’s manual" Dept. of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, Cornell University 1992

      15 Shin, M. H., "Estimation of LOADEST Model application for NPS pollutants from agricultural watershed" 2008

      16 Kang, H. W., "Enhancement of SWAT Auto-calibration using K-means Clustering Algorithm" 197-198, 2010

      17 USEPA, "Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources (BASINS) v. 3.0 User’s Manual" U. S. Environment Protection Agency 2001

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2015-12-02 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-06-07 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국농공학회지 -> 한국농공학회논문집 KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.53 0.53 0.45
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.41 0.41 0.525 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼