특이발현과 특이공발현을 고려한 유의한 유전자 집단 탐색 = Identifying statistically significant gene sets based on differential expression and differential coexpression

국문 초록 (Abstract)

서로 상관있는 유전자들의 발현조절이 질병이나 종양의 발생에 영향을 미치기 때문에 단일유전자 분석 대신 공통의 생물학적 요소를 지닌 유전자 집단 분석이 각광을 받게 되었고 생물학적으로 좀더 설명하기 쉬운 결과를 얻게 되었다. 표현형에 따라 유의한 차이를 보이는 유전자 집단을 찾는 여러 방법들이 있지만, 대부분의 방법들이 집단에 속한 유전자들의 표현형에 따른 발현의 차이를 탐색하거나 유전자들 사이의 공발현 구조가 다른지 탐색하는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 특이발현과 특이공발현의 차이를 모두 고려하는 탐색방법을 제시하였고 p53이란 유전자 자료와 모의자료를 이용하여 제시한 방법의 성능을 알아 보았다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Gene set analysis utilizing biologic information is expected to produce more interpretable results because the occurrence of tumors (or diseases) is believed to be associated with the regulation of related genes. Many methods have been developed to identify statistically significant gene sets across different phenotypes; however, most focus exclusively on either the differential gene expression or the differential correlation structure in the gene set. This research provides a new method that simultaneously considers the differential expression of genes and differential coexpression with multiple genes in the gene set. Application of this NEW method is illustrated with real microarray data example, p53; subsequently, a simulation study compares its type I error rate and power with GSEA, SAMGS, GSCA and GSNCA.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이선호, "마이크로어레이 자료분석에서 모수적 방법을 이용한 유전자군의 유의성 검정" 한국통계학회 16 (16): 397-408, 2009

2 김병수, "cDNA 마이크로어레이에서 유전자간 상관 관계에 대한 보고" 한국통계학회 22 (22): 617-626, 2009

3 Goeman, J., "Testing association of a pathway with survival using gene expression data" 21 : 1950-1957, 2005

4 Choi, Y., "Statistical methods for gene set co-expression analysis" 25 : 2780-2786, 2009

5 Tusher, V. G., "Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response" 98 : 5116-5121, 2001

6 Newton, M. A., "Random set methods identify distinct aspects of the enrichment signal in gene-set analysis" 1 : 85-106, 2007

7 Mootha, V. K., "PGC-1-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes" 34 : 267-273, 2003

8 Kim, S. Y., "PAGE: parametric analysis of gene set enrichment" 6 : 1471-2105, 2005

9 Khatri, P., "Onto-Tools: an ensemble of web-accessible, ontology-based tools for the functional design and interpretation of high-throughput gene expression experiments" 32 : 449-456, 2004

10 Efron, B., "On testing the significance of sets of genes" 1 : 107-129, 2007

11 Meyer, C., "Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra" Society for industrial and applied mathematics 2001

12 Dinu, I., "Improving gene set analysis of microarray data by SAM-GS" 8 : 242-, 2007

13 Draghici, S., "Global functional profiling of gene expression" 81 : 98-104, 2003

14 Rahmatallah, Y., "Gene sets net correlations analysis (GSNCA): a multivariate differential coexpression test for gene sets" 30 : 360-368, 2014

15 Subramanian, A., "Gene set enrichment analysis:A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles" 102 : 15545-15550, 2005

16 Maciejewski, H., "Gene set analysis methods: statistical models and methodological differences" 15 : 504-518, 2014

17 Jung, S., "EDDY: a novel statistical gene set test method to detect differential genetic dependencies" 42 : e60-, 2014

18 Klebanov, L., "Diverse correlation structures in gene expression data and their utility in improving statistical inference" 1 : 538-559, 2007

19 Tesson, B. M., "DiffCoEx: a simple and sensitive method to find differentially coexpressed gene modules" 11 : 497-, 2010

20 Qui, X., "Correlation between gene expression levels and limitations of the empirical Bayes methodology for finding differentially expressed genes" 4 : 2005

21 Ma, H., "COSINE: condition-specific sub-network identification using a global optimization method" 27 : 1290-1298, 2011

22 Lai, Y., "A statistical method for identifying differential gene-gene coexpression patterns" 20 : 3146-3155, 2004

23 Goeman, J., "A global test for groups of genes:testing association with a clinical outcome" 20 : 93-99, 2004