RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Application of Ductile Fracture Criteria for the FLD Prediction of Steel Sheets

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99593652

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper applies ductile fracture criteria for the formability prediction of various types of steel sheets to evaluate the accuracy of ductile fracture criteria on the prediction of forming limit diagrams (FLDs). The ductile fracture criteria studied in this paper include the Cockcroft criterion (1968), the Brozzo criterion (1972), the Oh criterion (1979), the Oyane-Sato criterion (1980), the Clift criterion (1990) and the Ko-Huh criterion (2007). The material properties and the experimental FLDs of 24 kinds of steel sheets are collected from researchers. Hosford79 yield function with normal anisotropy is utilized to model the yield surfaces of these steel sheets. The Hollomon equation is employed to describe the strain hardening behaviors. The material constants in the ductile fracture criteria are evaluated with the limited strains in the uniaxial tension state for Cockcroft criterion, Brozzo criterion, Oh criterion, Clift criterion and Ko-Huh criterion while the limit strains in both the uniaxial tension and plane strain tension conditions are used for the material constant evaluation in Oyane-Sato criterion. The FLDs are predicted with these ductile fracture criteria with linear strain paths. The predicted FLDs are compared with experimental data. The results show that the FLDs predicted from Oyane-Sato and Ko-Huh ductile fracture criteria match the experimental data well for the LHS FLDs while other ductile fracture criteria overestimate the limited strain in plane strain tension conditions. For the right hand side FLDs, all these ductile fracture criteria do not perform well compared with experimental FLDs.
      번역하기

      This paper applies ductile fracture criteria for the formability prediction of various types of steel sheets to evaluate the accuracy of ductile fracture criteria on the prediction of forming limit diagrams (FLDs). The ductile fracture criteria studie...

      This paper applies ductile fracture criteria for the formability prediction of various types of steel sheets to evaluate the accuracy of ductile fracture criteria on the prediction of forming limit diagrams (FLDs). The ductile fracture criteria studied in this paper include the Cockcroft criterion (1968), the Brozzo criterion (1972), the Oh criterion (1979), the Oyane-Sato criterion (1980), the Clift criterion (1990) and the Ko-Huh criterion (2007). The material properties and the experimental FLDs of 24 kinds of steel sheets are collected from researchers. Hosford79 yield function with normal anisotropy is utilized to model the yield surfaces of these steel sheets. The Hollomon equation is employed to describe the strain hardening behaviors. The material constants in the ductile fracture criteria are evaluated with the limited strains in the uniaxial tension state for Cockcroft criterion, Brozzo criterion, Oh criterion, Clift criterion and Ko-Huh criterion while the limit strains in both the uniaxial tension and plane strain tension conditions are used for the material constant evaluation in Oyane-Sato criterion. The FLDs are predicted with these ductile fracture criteria with linear strain paths. The predicted FLDs are compared with experimental data. The results show that the FLDs predicted from Oyane-Sato and Ko-Huh ductile fracture criteria match the experimental data well for the LHS FLDs while other ductile fracture criteria overestimate the limited strain in plane strain tension conditions. For the right hand side FLDs, all these ductile fracture criteria do not perform well compared with experimental FLDs.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. INTRODUCTION
      • 2. THEORITICAL BASIS
      • 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
      • 4. CONSLUSIONS
      • Abstract
      • 1. INTRODUCTION
      • 2. THEORITICAL BASIS
      • 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
      • 4. CONSLUSIONS
      • REFERENCES
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼