RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      윤리학의 학적 성격 -알베르투스의 전기- 『윤리학 주해』(Super Ethica)의 서문 분석- = On Albert’s View on Ethics as a Scientific Discipline Shown in the Prolog of His Super Ethica

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108580302

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It was not until the complete translation of the Nicomachean Ethics by Robert Grosseteste that the Latin world became acquainted with Aristotle’s ethics, and it was Albert the Great who became a pioneer in the development of ethics in the Medieval A...

      It was not until the complete translation of the Nicomachean Ethics by Robert Grosseteste that the Latin world became acquainted with Aristotle’s ethics, and it was Albert the Great who became a pioneer in the development of ethics in the Medieval Ages with his commentary on Ethics. Albert’s interpretation of Aristotle’s theories of moral happiness and contemplative happiness unifies them, and this reading is the basis for establishing the autonomy of Aristotelian ethics as science. Having demonstrated that scientific knowledge of human moral behavior is possible, Albert goes on to identify the scientific character of ethics by situating it within three formal categories. First, the subject-matter of ethics are human behavior and happiness, which Albert distinguishes as the final intention of ethics and common subject, respectively, and establishes a unity of subject-matter by establishing an order between them. Second, ethics is divided into political science and economics according to the kind of good, yet Albert believes that these two disciplines actually form a single ethical system because they have a relation of principle or cause and effects to ethics. Third, ethics is bound to define its purpose and research method within the dichotomy of “ethica docens” and “ethica utens”, but Albert harmonizes moral practice and ethics by understanding these two as corresponding to the relationship between the subject-matters of ethical study, that is, the relationship between the final intention and the common subject. Authorizing Aristotelian ethics as an independent science, Albert opens up a possibility of discussing virtue, ethics in general, and happiness in a Christian-theological context. This paper analyzes Albert’s views on the disciplinary form of ethics by examining the preface to his First Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics (Super Ethica).

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼