II급 부정 교합자의 Activator 치료 후 골격 및 안모 변화에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Skeletal and Profile Change after Using the Activator in Class II Malocclusion

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

To establish the diagnosis and treatment plan for skeletal Class II malocclusion, patient's skeletal morphology, prognosis as well as the treatment effect is one of the important factor to consider. Therefore, the present study classified analyzed the difference between initial(T1) and after use of activator(T2), and after finish of direct multi-bonding system treatment(T3) for Class II malocclusion during growth period according to the treatment result(effective body length) and morphology of vertical skeletal type. The experimental group was classified into two groups(1 group, 2 group) according to the effective body length change between before and after use of activator, showed good treatment effect of activator for patient with small mandible and large differential between maxilla and mandible, and short anterior facial height. And the difference between 1 and 2 group in the experimental group before treatment(T1) disappeared in the finished treatment(T3). But in contrast, the initial difference of T1 stage between a and b group in the control group did not disappear in the finished treatment(T3). In short, experimental group's treatment effect was much better than contrast group and the treatment effect was maintained and got stable results at comparison experimental group with contrast group. Through this study, we can find activator's treatment effect and stable retention of that in growing Class II malocclusion patients. By estimate of activator treatment effect through these results, we can establish the correct diagnosis and treatment plan for adolescent Class II malocclusion estimate of activator treatment effect and lead the ideal facial growth pattern.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Pfeiffer, J.P., "philosophy of combined orthopedic-orthodontic treatment" 81 (81): 185-201, 1982

2 Kingsley, N.W., "Treatise on oral deformitietes as a branch of mechanical surgery" Appleton &Lange 1880

3 Craig, C.E., "The skeletal patterns characteristic of Class I and Class II, division I malocclusion in normal lateralis" 21 (21): 44-56, 1951

4 Forsberg, C.M., "Skeletal and soft tissue response toactivator treatment" 3 (3): 247-253, 1981

5 Vargervik, K., "Response to activator treatment inClass II malocclusions" 88 (88): 242-251, 1985

6 Willams, R., "Proffit : Out comes in a 2-phase randomized clinicaltrial of early class II treatment" 125 : 657-667, 2004

7 Perillo, L., "Permanance of skeletal changes after function regulator(FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusiveClass II malocclusions" 109 (109): 132-139, 1996

8 Perillo, L., "Permanance of skeletal changes after function regulator(FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusive Class II malocclusions" 109 (109): 132-139, 1996

9 Bishara, S.E., "Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion" 113 (113): 661-673, 1998

10 McNamara, J.A. Jr., "Long-term mandibular adaptation to protrusive function: an experimental study in Macaca mulatta" 92 (92): 98-108, 1987

11 Andresen, V., "Funktionskieferothopädie: die grundlagen des 'norwegischen systems'" H. Meusser 1939

12 Bjork, A., "Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallicimplants" 13 (13): 9-34, 1955

13 You, Z.H., "Dentoalveolar changes related to mandibular forward growth in untreated Class II persons" 120 (120): 598-607, 2001

14 Rothstein, T., "Dental and facial skeletal characterics andgrowth of females and males with Class II Division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14(revisited). Part II. Anteroposterior and vertical circumpubertal growth" 120 (120): 542-555, 2001

15 McNamara, J.A. Jr., "Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age" 51 : 177-202, 1981

16 King, G.J., "Comparison of peer assessment rating(PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions" 123 : 489-496, 2003

17 Andresen, V., "Beitrag zur retention" 3 : 121-, 1910

18 Pancherz, H., "Acephalometric analysis of skeletal and dentalchanges contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment" 85 (85): 125-134, 1984

19 Buschang, P.H., "A polynomial approach to craniofacial growth: description and comparison ofadolescent males with normal occlusion and those with untreated Class II malscclusion" 90 : 437-442, 1986

20 Bierbaek, L., "A laminagraphic study of the alterations of the temporomandibular joint following activatortreatment" 6 : 157-, 1984

21 Riesmeijer, Prahl Andersen, "A comparison of craniofacial Class I and Class II growth patterns" 125 : 463-471, 2004

22 Gianelly, A.A., "A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise, andFrankel appliance" 86 (86): 269-276, 1984