조선 후기 『본초강목』의 전래와 그 활용 : 『본초정화』, 『본초부방편람』을 중심으로 = The Introduction of Compendium of Materia Medica(本草綱目) and Praxis in the Late Joseon Dynasty

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Sakae Miki said Classified Emergency Materia Medica(證類本草) had been the dominant standard of herbology throughout Joseon Dynasty, and that Compendium of Materia Medica(本草綱目) had only been accepted so lately that a few books used herbological result of it in the late Joseon Dynasty.
But according to Visiting Old Beijing Diary (燕行日錄) written by Munjoong Seo(徐文重) in 1690, Compendium of Materia Medica(本草綱目) was in fact introduced before the year 1712, the year Miki Sakae argued to be the year Compendium of Materia Medica was accepted to Joseon officially. Now, we can assume that the introducing year of Compendium of Materia Medica was faster than Miki Sakae’s opinion by the following reasons; the effort of Joseon government and intellectuals to buy new books of Ming (明) & Ching(淸); the publishing year of the book for living in countryside (山林經濟) regarded as the first citing literature of Compendium of Materia Medica. And the True Records of the Joseon Dynasty (朝鮮王朝實錄) and many collections written by intellectuals in the 18th century show that the herbological knowledge from Compendium of Materia Medica had already spread to the corners of Joseon Dynasty. Thus we can make the following assumption: Classified Emergency Materia Medica and Compendium of Materia Medica had coexisted in the late Joseon Dynasty.
Sakae Miki suggested 6 examples which used Compendium of Materia Medica in the late Joseon Dynasty. I reviewed two of them in this paper, Essentials of Materia Medica(本草精華) & Handbook of Prescriptions from Materia Medica(本草附方便覽). Essentials of Materia Medica quoted Compendium of Materia Medica briefly focusing clinical use, and Handbook of Prescriptions from Materia Medica also re-compiled Compendium of Materia Medica to practical use according to the form of Treasured Mirror of Eastern Medicine (東醫寶鑑). It means that the results of Compendium of Materia Medica have been used positively, based on the herbology of materia medica from countryside(鄕藥).
From this point of view, the hyphothesis there weren’t any herbological progress after accepting Compendium of Materia Medica in the late Joseon Dynasty by Sakae Miki can be denied.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 머리말
• 2. 선행 연구 및 연구의 한계
• 3. 『본초강목』의 간행과 조선 유입
• 4. 『본초정화』에서 보이는 『본초강목』의 영향
• 5. 『본초부방편람』에서 보이는 『본초강목』의 영향
• 6. 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 王剑, "李时珍学术硏究" 中医古籍出版社 1996

2 "후한서(後漢書)"

3 이선아, "황도연의 方藥合編에 관한 연구" 11 (11): 2001

4 "한의신문"

5 황도연, "한국과학기술사자료대계 의약학편 27, In 證脈方藥合編" 여강출판사 1992

6 황도연, "한국과학기술사자료대계 의약학편 25, In 醫宗損益" 여강출판사 1994

7 황도연, "한국과학기술사자료대계 의약학편 22, In 本草附方便覽" 여강출판사 1988

8 傅芳, "중국과학기술사" 일중사 2003

9 김영진, "조선 후기 중국사행과 서책문화, In 연행의 사회사" 경기문화재단 2005

10 오재근, "조선 의서 수재 藥性歌에 대한 연구" 대전대 2010

11 원재연, "연행의 사회사" 경기문화재단 2005

12 이시필, "소문사설, 조선의 실용지식 연구노트" 휴머니스트 2011

13 "논어(論語)"

14 林春荣, "穆希雍医学全书" 中国中医药出版社 1999

15 부유섭, "燕行錄을 통해 본 康雍 年間 中國 書籍 유입에 대하여" 우리한문학회 22 : 269-306, 2010

16 钱超尘, "李时珍硏究集成" 中医古籍出版社 2003

17 潘吉星, "本草纲目之东被及西渐, In 李时珍硏究集成" 中医古籍出版社 2003

18 李时珍, "本草纲目" 人民卫生出版社 1982

19 宮下三郞, "本草綱目の藥物分類, In 明淸時代の科學技術史" 京都大學人文科學硏究所 1970

20 안상우, "本草精華의 가치와 본초학적 성취, In DIGITAL 本草精華해설" 한국한의학연구원 2005

21 이덕호, "本草精華 草部 향약명에 관한 연구" 11 (11): 2005

22 권영배, "本草精華 人部에 대한 고찰" 11 (11): 2005

23 岡西爲人, "本草槪說" 創元社 1983

24 山田慶兒, "本草と夢と鍊金術と" 朝日新聞社 1997

25 三木榮, "朝鮮醫書誌" 學術圖書刊行會 1973

26 三木榮, "朝鮮醫學史及疾病史" 自家出版 1962

27 藪內淸, "明淸時代の科學技術史" 京都大學人文科學硏究所 1970

28 남산당편집국, "對譯 證脈方藥合編" 남산당 1983

29 山田慶兒, "中国医学の起源" 岩波書店 1999

30 오재근, "『本草綱目』이 『廣濟秘笈』에 미친 영향 분석 -｢鄕藥單方治驗｣을 중심으로" 대한한의학원전학회 22 (22): 337-346, 2009

31 宋翠莲, "「本草纲目」的出版和编译槪况, In 李时珍学术硏究" 中医古籍出版社 1996

32 National Institute of Korean History, "The Annals of the Choson Dynasty (Chosun wangjo sillok)"

33 Institute for the Translation of Korean Classics, "NaengJaeJip"

34 Institute for the Translation of Korean Classics, "JukSeoGwanIlgi"

35 안상우, "DIGITAL 本草精華해설" 한국한의학연구원 2005

36 염정섭, "18세기 후반 正祖代 勸農策과 水利 진흥책" 규장각한국학연구원 (29) : 179-215, 2002