RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      김수영과 월트 휘트먼 비교연구 = Comparative Study between Kim Su-young and Walt Whitman

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102956750

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper aims to find out the relationship between Kim Su-young and Walt Whitman on literature, which has been strongly hypothesized. Despite of some reliable clues, there have been no specific attempts to make this clear because their works seem to be different distinctly each other. As Whitman was an extroverted poet who glorified rich scenery of nature in America and sang love and freedom, Kim Su-young wrote poems which reflected everyday honestly, filled with sorrow and solitude. Kim Su-young, however, had constantly empathized and practiced `freedom` and `corporeity` from earlier works and an inquiry into the universality of `love`, which exactly showed an influence of Whitman to him. Some evidences show that Kim Su-young sought to absorb the authors he read. And Whitman was also possibly absorbed into Kim Su-young`s works, modified with the times and conditions in his unique way. This paper plans to examine influence of Whitman and modified aspect to Kim Su-young`s works as read works of Kim Su-young and Walt Whitman together. For that, this paper reads Kim Su-young through Whitman`s thought. Firstly, I payed attention to emphasis on establishment of the first person narrative-that is a saint persona and on corporeity. Each point seems like loose clothing so it looks like every answers possible though, it is worth underlying both first person narrative(a saint persona) and corporeity which were the unique aspect of Whitman present in Kim Su-young`s work at the same time. Secondly, I attempt to reveal apparent similarity and distinction. Comparing with Walt Whitman`s work which mainly expressed admiration to the nature and love-thy-neighbour actively, Kim Su-young`s works focused on the modern problems like solitude and sorrow. However, the way of expressing `love`, which is the main theme and is presented horizontal imagery, is apparently similar to each other. Catalog technic is a unique style of Whitman, and it is not simply for a rhythm or rhetorical effect but for an embodiment of `love`. In case of Kim Su-young`s late works, `Sarang-eh Byen-ju-gok`(Love Variation), `Pul-eh Young-sang` (Image of Grass), `Geo-dae-han Puri`(Great root), also show an identical technic and theme. This paper has limitations to look deeper the influential relationship between Kim Su-young and Walt Whitman empirically. But the influential relationship from Whitman to Kim Su-young would come up in the conclusion.
      번역하기

      This paper aims to find out the relationship between Kim Su-young and Walt Whitman on literature, which has been strongly hypothesized. Despite of some reliable clues, there have been no specific attempts to make this clear because their works seem to...

      This paper aims to find out the relationship between Kim Su-young and Walt Whitman on literature, which has been strongly hypothesized. Despite of some reliable clues, there have been no specific attempts to make this clear because their works seem to be different distinctly each other. As Whitman was an extroverted poet who glorified rich scenery of nature in America and sang love and freedom, Kim Su-young wrote poems which reflected everyday honestly, filled with sorrow and solitude. Kim Su-young, however, had constantly empathized and practiced `freedom` and `corporeity` from earlier works and an inquiry into the universality of `love`, which exactly showed an influence of Whitman to him. Some evidences show that Kim Su-young sought to absorb the authors he read. And Whitman was also possibly absorbed into Kim Su-young`s works, modified with the times and conditions in his unique way. This paper plans to examine influence of Whitman and modified aspect to Kim Su-young`s works as read works of Kim Su-young and Walt Whitman together. For that, this paper reads Kim Su-young through Whitman`s thought. Firstly, I payed attention to emphasis on establishment of the first person narrative-that is a saint persona and on corporeity. Each point seems like loose clothing so it looks like every answers possible though, it is worth underlying both first person narrative(a saint persona) and corporeity which were the unique aspect of Whitman present in Kim Su-young`s work at the same time. Secondly, I attempt to reveal apparent similarity and distinction. Comparing with Walt Whitman`s work which mainly expressed admiration to the nature and love-thy-neighbour actively, Kim Su-young`s works focused on the modern problems like solitude and sorrow. However, the way of expressing `love`, which is the main theme and is presented horizontal imagery, is apparently similar to each other. Catalog technic is a unique style of Whitman, and it is not simply for a rhythm or rhetorical effect but for an embodiment of `love`. In case of Kim Su-young`s late works, `Sarang-eh Byen-ju-gok`(Love Variation), `Pul-eh Young-sang` (Image of Grass), `Geo-dae-han Puri`(Great root), also show an identical technic and theme. This paper has limitations to look deeper the influential relationship between Kim Su-young and Walt Whitman empirically. But the influential relationship from Whitman to Kim Su-young would come up in the conclusion.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김현승, "金洙暎의 詩的 位置, In 김수영의 문학" 민음사 1983

      2 이광운, "휘트먼의 시적 상상력" 정림사 2007

      3 홍기돈, "현대의 순교와 부호라하는 사랑-김수영 문학에 대하여" (여름) : 2004

      4 김용권, "한국문학에 끼친 미국의 영향과 그 연구" 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소 10 (10): 1967

      5 월트 휘트먼, "풀잎" 혜원 1987

      6 황준걸, "일본 논어 해석학" 성균관대 출판부 2011

      7 랄프 왈도 에머슨, "위인이란 무엇인가/자기신념의 철학" 동서문화사 2010

      8 월트 휘트먼, "월트 휘트먼" 이담 2012

      9 정과리, "왜 김수영인가?" (188) : 2005

      10 랄프 왈도 에머슨, "에머슨 수상록" 청아출판사 1985

      1 김현승, "金洙暎의 詩的 位置, In 김수영의 문학" 민음사 1983

      2 이광운, "휘트먼의 시적 상상력" 정림사 2007

      3 홍기돈, "현대의 순교와 부호라하는 사랑-김수영 문학에 대하여" (여름) : 2004

      4 김용권, "한국문학에 끼친 미국의 영향과 그 연구" 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소 10 (10): 1967

      5 월트 휘트먼, "풀잎" 혜원 1987

      6 황준걸, "일본 논어 해석학" 성균관대 출판부 2011

      7 랄프 왈도 에머슨, "위인이란 무엇인가/자기신념의 철학" 동서문화사 2010

      8 월트 휘트먼, "월트 휘트먼" 이담 2012

      9 정과리, "왜 김수영인가?" (188) : 2005

      10 랄프 왈도 에머슨, "에머슨 수상록" 청아출판사 1985

      11 김명인, "살아있는 김수영" 2005

      12 이승훈, "모더니즘의 비판적 수용" 작가 2002

      13 유종호, "다채로운 레파토리-洙暎, In 김수영의 문학" 민음사 1983

      14 월트 휘트먼, "나 자신의 노래" 지식을만드는지식 2010

      15 조현일, "김수영의 모더니티관과 파르티잔 리뷰, In 살아있는 김수영" 창비 2005

      16 허윤회, "김수영 지우기" 상허학회 14 : 103-132, 2005

      17 김수영, "김수영 전집 1, 2" 민음사 2005

      18 장석원, "김수영 시의 수사학" 청동거울 2005

      19 배개화, "김수영 시에 나타난 양가적 의식" 우리말글학회 36 : 263-296, 2006

      20 신형철, "김수영 시에 나타난 '사랑'과 '죽음'의 의미 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2002

      21 박주현, "김수영 문학에 나타난 내면적 자유 연구: 죽음과 사랑을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2003

      22 박지영, "김수영 문학과 ‘번역’" 민족문학사학회 (39) : 200-228, 2009

      23 황동규, "良心과 自由, 그리고 사랑, In 김수영의 문학" 민음사 1983

      24 랄프 왈도 에머슨, "文化․ 政治․ 藝術: R.W. 에머슨 論全集" 中央文化 社 1956

      25 조연정, "‘번역체험’이 김수영 시론에 미친 영향 - ‘침묵’을 번역하는 시작 태도와 관련하여" 한국학연구소 (38) : 459-490, 2011

      26 John Townsend Trowbridge, "Reminiscences of Walt Whitman"

      27 Walt Whitman, "Notebooks and Unpublished Prose Manuscripts 1" New York University Press 1994

      28 Walt Whitman, "Francis Murphy, In The Complete Poems" Penguin Books 2004

      29 조규택, "19세기 미국 초절주의 시" 신영어영문학회 11 : 1998

      30 박연희, "1950-60년대 냉전문화의 번역과 ‘김수영’" 국제비교한국학회 20 (20): 101-139, 2012

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-13 학술지등록 한글명 : 국제어문
      외국어명 : Korean Language and Literature in International Context
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.7 0.7 0.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.81 0.76 1.32 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼