Introducing design for selective laser melting in aerospace industry

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The selective laser melting (SLM) process has created new possibilities for the manufacture of new lightweight jet engine components with lattice structures replacing solid sections. Hopes are to reduce the density of the component and thereby saving weight. To introduce the new manufacturing process, the components need to be redesigned and verified to comply with an array of requirements concerning, for example, strength, aerodynamics, and manufacturing. To find out how a capability of designing and evaluating components for the SLM process can be built into an organization, an interview investigation has been conducted at an aerospace company finding the state of practice in technology and product development. The impact of introducing SLM is thereafter estimated. The result is that introducing a novel manufacturing process will primarily influence the methods used to predict product lifecycle performance. An important finding is that it is currently difficult to include a topology optimization step in the multiobjective design evaluation environment used at the company due to which the complexity would increase significantly.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Brackett, D., "Topology optimization for additive manufacturing, In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium-An Additive Manufacturing Conference" 2011 : 348-362, 2011

2 Wang, X., "Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review" 83 : 127-141, 2016

3 Booth, J. W., "The design for additive manufacturing worksheet" 139 (139): 1-9, 2017

4 Panesar, A., "Strategies for functionally graded lattice structures derived using topology optimisation for additive manufacturing" 19 : 81-94, 2018

5 Rosen, D. W., "Research supporting principles for design for additive manufacturing: This paper provides a comprehensive review on current design principles and strategies for AM" 9 (9): 225-232, 2014

6 Almefelt, L., "Requirements management in practice : Findings from an empirical study in the automotive industry" 17 (17): 113-134, 2006

7 Li, D., "Optimal design and modeling of gyroid-based functionally graded cellular structures for additive manufacturing" 104 : 87-99, 2018

8 Xiling Yao, "Multidisciplinary design optimization to identify additive manufacturing resources in customized product development" 한국CDE학회 4 (4): 131-142, 2017

9 Verbart, A., "Level set based topology optimizationwith stress constraints and consistent sensitivity analysis" 1-15, 2012

10 Takezawa, A., "Isotropic Ti–6Al–4V lattice via topology optimization and electron-beam melting" 22 : 634-642, 2018

11 Stolt, R., "Introducing welding manufacturability in a multidisciplinary platform for the evaluation of conceptual aircraft engine components" 10 (10): 107-123, 2017

12 Stolt, R., "Integrating additive manufacturing in the design of aerospace components" IOS Press 145-154, 2018

13 Stolt, R., "How to challenge fluctuating requirements: Results from three companies" Transdisciplinary Engineering:Crossing Boundaries, IOS Press 1061-1070, 2016

14 Challis, V. J., "High specific strength and stiffness structures produced using selective laser melting" 63 : 783-788, 2014

15 Pabolu, V. K. R., "Flexible manufacturability analysis applied to the welding process to increase sustainability in engineer to order businesses" 10 (10): 271-294, 2017

16 Sercombe, T. B., "Failure modes in high strength and stiffness to weight scaffolds produced by selective laser melting" 67 : 501-508, 2015

17 Cheng, L., "Efficient design optimization of variable-density cellular structures for additive manufacturing : Theory and experimental validation" 23 (23): 660-677, 2017

18 Klahn, C., "Design strategies for the process of additive manufacturing" 36 : 230-235, 2015

19 Stolt, R., "Design for inspection –evaluating the inspectability of aerospace components in the early stages of design" 11 : 1193-1199, 2017

20 Stolt, R., "Design for inspection : Evaluating the inspectability of aerospace components in the early stages of design" 1193-1199, 2017

21 Thompson, M. K., "Design for additive manufacturing : Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints" 65 (65): 737-760, 2016

22 Arisoy, E. B., "Design and topology optimization of lattice structures using deformable implicit surfaces for additive manufacturing" 1-11, 2015

23 Liu, J., "Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing" 57 (57): 2457-2483, 2018

24 Leutenecker-Twelsiek, B., "Considering part orientation in design for additive manufacturing" 50 : 408-413, 2016

25 Xia, L., "Bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization on advanced structures and materials: A comprehensive review" 25 (25): 437-478, 2018

26 Heikkinen, T., "Automated Producibility Assessment Enabling Set-Based Concurrent Engineering" IOS Press 2016

27 Hjertberg, T., "A tool for obtaining transparency and traceability in heterogeneous design automation environments" 15 (15): 1-13, 2018

28 Rosen, D. W., "A review of synthesis methods for additive manufacturing" 11 (11): 305-317, 2016

29 Wang, M. Y., "A level set method for structural topology optimization" 192 (192): 227-246, 2003

30 Suzuki, K., "A homogenization method for shape and topology optimization" 93 (93): 291-318, 1991

31 Diegel, O., "A Practical Guide to Design for Additive Manufacturing" Springer 2019

32 Hallgren, S., "(Re) Design for additive manufacturing" 50 : 246-251, 2016